Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
46. I noted the level of contact he has with on-scene photographers too.
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 10:50 AM
Jul 2014

More there than meets the eye for sure, but the info looks good.

I hadn't seen the still of the launch trail before, and the video of the BUK scurrying away was fortuitous. Cell-phone cameras have been a global game-changer.

That's as close as you'll get to hearing the capability. joshcryer Jul 2014 #1
Well, it's a small theater and we'd be watching more closely... DRoseDARs Jul 2014 #5
It is possible that the separatists were too drunk and untrainable to operate the thing. amandabeech Jul 2014 #49
Russians appear to have done similar and you dismissed that last Saturday dipsydoodle Jul 2014 #14
They also claimed the plane was being tailed by an Su-25. joshcryer Jul 2014 #15
I didn't claim that. dipsydoodle Jul 2014 #16
You didn't see their Powell-esque insane speculative crap? joshcryer Jul 2014 #18
Must've missed that report completely. dipsydoodle Jul 2014 #21
This is true, and again social media is figuring it out: joshcryer Jul 2014 #22
That's one section only dipsydoodle Jul 2014 #23
Check out that Reddit thread. joshcryer Jul 2014 #24
Let's see the evidence Paolo123 Jul 2014 #2
They probably don't want to divulge murielm99 Jul 2014 #3
Well then Paolo123 Jul 2014 #4
because it fits the facts that have been confirmed geek tragedy Jul 2014 #6
I agree with you overall quakerboy Jul 2014 #9
That might be a legitimate argument Bartlet Jul 2014 #11
I think you are reading more into what I wrote than what I said quakerboy Jul 2014 #50
Except shooting down a Russian plane geek tragedy Jul 2014 #28
If they had radar, and they had to in order to track a target... Tom Rinaldo Jul 2014 #29
Whatever billhicks76 Jul 2014 #12
I had mussels last night at dinner. longship Jul 2014 #27
No Point To Spellcheck Edit Now billhicks76 Jul 2014 #30
Well, who do you trust? longship Jul 2014 #35
"Neo-Nazi Ukrainians" is straight-up Kremlin geek tragedy Jul 2014 #31
Wow So Sarcastic billhicks76 Jul 2014 #32
In order to buy your theory that the Ukrainians geek tragedy Jul 2014 #34
You're Hilarious billhicks76 Jul 2014 #37
We have satellites, but they aren't so powerful that they monitor geek tragedy Jul 2014 #39
And By The Way billhicks76 Jul 2014 #36
That Was No Accident, Sir The Magistrate Jul 2014 #47
Preponderance of evidence. murielm99 Jul 2014 #7
I'm not siding with anyone. Paolo123 Jul 2014 #25
Because the Rebels Bartlet Jul 2014 #10
What is wrong to asking to see the evidence that the US has? Paolo123 Jul 2014 #26
Sometimes you don't let your evidence out for examination. Igel Jul 2014 #40
Fine Paolo123 Jul 2014 #45
"In the case of the US it's reputation on being honest about foreign intelligence is precisely zero" tabasco Jul 2014 #51
Ah the old National Security ploy ... GeorgeGist Jul 2014 #48
I don't automatically believe defacto7 Jul 2014 #8
any agency, news source Niceguy1 Jul 2014 #13
Yes but if for example dipsydoodle Jul 2014 #17
IMO, that was before the internet. joshcryer Jul 2014 #20
It's telling that the US government is using social media to prove their case. joshcryer Jul 2014 #19
That blog is a remarkable piece of detective work. GliderGuider Jul 2014 #38
I verified his last dozen or so "geolocations." joshcryer Jul 2014 #41
I noted the level of contact he has with on-scene photographers too. GliderGuider Jul 2014 #46
Some people are scary smart. Igel Jul 2014 #42
I really like to think this guy is just that good. joshcryer Jul 2014 #44
i should f****ing hope so dembotoz Jul 2014 #33
Don't need to. Igel Jul 2014 #43
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US tracked missile that b...»Reply #46