Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Man accused of exploiting Sen. Cochran's ill wife [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)80. Not unless the have internet in the jail. He's being held on 100K bond.
That means he's gotta come up with ten and security to walk out.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
93 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Wonder what is wrong with the person who hired him. What a disgusting thing to do.
LoisB
May 2014
#61
That was not a SCOTUS decision, was it? And the Seventh Circ. said nothing about being very ill
merrily
May 2014
#55
Well, we know where that's coming from... Breitbart or O'Keefe territory. n/t
freshwest
May 2014
#16
You are wrong as obviously you CAN "arrest people for taking private pictures of public figures"
uppityperson
May 2014
#20
It is OK and he will be prosecuted. You can't put a person's health in jeopardy because you want to.
Tikki
May 2014
#33
It's not the "about a politician" part that is a problem. What part of "the law" remains unclear
MADem
May 2014
#35
Of course, if there is a fire in the theater, you should shout "fire"; but, even if your boss is an
24601
May 2014
#82
"exploitation of a vulnerable adult" was what he was arrested for and if you notice, I said not
uppityperson
May 2014
#51
You need to think again. He exploited a vulnerable person and that's against the law.
MADem
May 2014
#50
A woman in a nursing home is a public figure, even though she's never sought office?
merrily
May 2014
#53
He seems like a real prize, that blogger--and his champion on this board is a cake-taker too....
MADem
May 2014
#37
First Amendment my ass - there are specific laws pertaining to photographers
groundloop
May 2014
#54
So all the First Amendment criers who thinks its okay to invade one's privacy in
Thinkingabout
May 2014
#63
That's truly a dispicable act. He'll be at church Sunday with the usual unctious smile.
marble falls
May 2014
#66