Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Mark Emmert rips NCAA unionization [View all]LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)32. So you would believe it is best to continue....
Treating STUDENT-ATHLETES like Indentured Servants. The school weeps all the profit while the STUDENT-ATHLETE is just "happy" to have a partial or full scholarship, which can only be maintained by meeting various conditions (such as practicing their sport up to 9 months a year).
Sorry, but this in my opinion is ridiculous.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I have no real objection to the players getting compensation but if they do then shouldnt all
cstanleytech
Apr 2014
#40
If it's a purely commercial enterprise, why associate it with educational institutions at all? nt
delrem
Apr 2014
#4
"It would blow up everything about the collegiate model of athletics." < With any luck. n/t
jtuck004
Apr 2014
#18
Here's something I havent seen anyone mention: If they're employees, then scholarships are taxable,
7962
Apr 2014
#19
But this ruling could change the status of your scholarship if the IRS wants to do it.
7962
Apr 2014
#31
A lot of folks think the same. But players can also GET A DEGREE. Most arent going pro anyway.
7962
Apr 2014
#43
But once they are considered employees, the scholarship could be considered payment, couldnt it?
7962
Apr 2014
#49
I just went to Northwestern's website to lookup the cost of tution, etc and
WhoWoodaKnew
Apr 2014
#42