Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
24. "Runs the show at Goldman"
Wed Dec 25, 2013, 01:12 PM
Dec 2013

"Social investing" and "public and private partnership work" are weasely euphemisms. An outfit like Goldman Sachs doesn't do anything of the sort. It does some public relations to put the perfume on the dogshit, and engages in social engineering to shape society in its interests.

Isn't compartmentalization grand? Anyone who chooses to work at the firm responsible for running up oil and food prices and causing worldwide hunger in 2008 doesn't get excuses, even if she had nothing to do with those activities.

Goldman Sachs is a criminal organization deriving hyperprofit from actions of global piracy, plunder and effectively mass murder. No one person runs the show, various functions are undertaken in making possible the eventual bottom line. A key part of that is distracting from the criminality by engaging on the side in some ostensible charity to a few of the victims of capitalism. Blunting potential opposition by spreading a bit of money around, especially in New York. However, after Goldman's immense atrocity became so internationally prominent during the crisis, I would have respected someone willing to walk away from the perks of such a job by making her resignation as loud as possible. But then she wouldn't be considered for new jobs in management positions, would she now?

Goldman Sachs, of course, shouldn't exist. It should have been liquidated along with the other TBTFs in 2008. Instead they were rescued at an enormous expense to the public, so that they could emerge more powerful and more enabled to engage in mass crime than before. Did they throw some obols afterwards at the worthy poor? Was this lady one who got to put a smile on the affair?

New York City has hundreds of CEOs of housing and development groups that aren't Goldman Sachs to choose from. Your assertion that she's the only one for the job is ludicrous! Such an appointment is a signal to the ruling class and everyone else who doesn't have blinders on that it will be business as usual with at best the appearance of reform, just like Bratton -- just like the choice of Rahm Emanuel by Obama as his first appointment.

Tale of two cities. Where's the other one?

sounds like a horrible way to start his administration grasswire Dec 2013 #1
Why do you say that? PragmaticLiberal Dec 2013 #4
because of the signal it sends grasswire Dec 2013 #5
"Just the Goldman Sachs thing" JackRiddler Dec 2013 #7
Don't get me wrong Jack: Maybe Ms. Glen's a horrible woman and is only concerned about the 1%. PragmaticLiberal Dec 2013 #17
Why would he choose somebody from Goldman Sachs choie Dec 2013 #8
DeBlasio, apparently another rightie shill in progressive/Democratic clothing. Knew it. That's all blkmusclmachine Dec 2013 #10
Which other competent woman wanted the job? Nt TomClash Dec 2013 #15
Of course. JackRiddler Dec 2013 #20
Oh sure TomClash Dec 2013 #22
"Runs the show at Goldman" JackRiddler Dec 2013 #24
Yeah whatever TomClash Dec 2013 #25
Thank you for projecting your non-argument JackRiddler Dec 2013 #28
So then why don't you join the DeBlasio Administration? TomClash Dec 2013 #31
So there! Dismissed! Boo-yeah! JackRiddler Dec 2013 #32
I wasn't dismissing you TomClash Dec 2013 #33
For one that's what she did did before she worked a Goldman SpartanDem Dec 2013 #38
11-Dimensional rope-a-dupe. "Bi-partisanship." Best he could do. MUST. LOOK. FORWARD. blkmusclmachine Dec 2013 #12
Oh, yeah. There was also "Hope," "Change," and "WTF" ("Win The Future"). blkmusclmachine Dec 2013 #13
it may be that Ms. Glen is sincere, as sincere as it's possible for GS' folks to be zazen Dec 2013 #2
It takes a lot of hope NoOneMan Dec 2013 #3
Meet the new boss colbertforpresident Dec 2013 #6
+1. blkmusclmachine Dec 2013 #11
Keeping it in "The Family." blkmusclmachine Dec 2013 #9
It's not his first appointee TomClash Dec 2013 #14
The police commissioner he appointed supports Stop and Frisk. LeftyMom Dec 2013 #16
Not true - Bratton abandoned it long ago TomClash Dec 2013 #18
They're promising to "reform" Stop and Frisk, not to end it. LeftyMom Dec 2013 #19
Stop and frisk started as an academic theory TomClash Dec 2013 #23
Political appointees don't generally announce that they're breaking the law with their policies. LeftyMom Dec 2013 #34
Re-read your post TomClash Dec 2013 #35
Oh, this ought to be good. LeftyMom Dec 2013 #36
The reform is that they will follow the law TomClash Dec 2013 #37
"Ms. Glen said she did not think her co-workers at Goldman would object to paying higher taxes" adirondacker Dec 2013 #21
What? Was no one from the Blackstone Group interested? OnyxCollie Dec 2013 #26
No one else in New York knows housing and development. JackRiddler Dec 2013 #29
That's ok. He was a hippy once Penicilino Dec 2013 #27
Hippie. Anyway. Yeah. JackRiddler Dec 2013 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»De Blasio Taps a Goldman ...»Reply #24