Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Otherwise said, the GOP filibustered a bill to stop the sequester which would have had 52 votes for Mass Feb 2013 #1
Well, is that it, then? This should be fun. TwilightGardener Feb 2013 #2
Only in America do you lose with a 51-49 vote. GodlessBiker Feb 2013 #3
Democratic Senators only get 3/5ths of a vote. tridim Feb 2013 #4
LOL! GodlessBiker Feb 2013 #5
House wouldn't pass this bill modrepub Feb 2013 #13
If Reid had followed through with his idea of changing the filibuster this wouldn't be happening. dorksied Feb 2013 #6
Harry's let more than 1 chance to level the playing field pass him by ... Myrina Feb 2013 #7
Agreed. We need someone who has a backbone. dorksied Feb 2013 #8
Reid's tenure as Senate Majority Leader must end now. Euphoria Mar 2013 #18
Well...minority rules. Webster Green Feb 2013 #9
Nope, majority ruled! Majority money, that is. nt valerief Feb 2013 #11
Once again thanks a lot Harry for going w/a handshake agreement w/McConnell .... Botany Feb 2013 #10
Too bad the Democrats lost in 2012, and lost again in 2008, blkmusclmachine Feb 2013 #12
So? What's that have to do with the vote in the Senate. Cha Feb 2013 #15
We need to get the word to Harry Reid! mpcamb Mar 2013 #19
But what are these alternatives compared to the sequester? Lasher Feb 2013 #14
All it takes is a one line bill to end the madness...nt and-justice-for-all Feb 2013 #16
These 3 Senators vote with the Republicans more often than not octoberlib Feb 2013 #17
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Breaking: Senate Rejects ...»Reply #2