Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

patrice

(47,992 posts)
13. Wow. way to collaborate, not. But then perhaps you're only a pawn, not granted
Tue Feb 12, 2013, 04:41 PM
Feb 2013

the right/powers of freely evaluating and deciding independently - or - you're not a pawn and that actually is a free, independent, rational evaluation you just delivered, not just opinion, in which case I am told that you have a right to it, but that right does not require that I, or anyone else respect that which, apparently, is not capable of respecting differences on this and/or other matters and surely you wouldn't oppose reaping what you sow, unless you're claiming somekind of PRIVILEGE that I was allowed no choice in the divine act of deigning to bestow that on you. Therefore, the result of the - or - above is, hence, a stalemate of disrespect, which is what we have going on now without filibuster reform, in the status quo, so perhaps you'll pardon me if I observe that you are the same thing as that which you CLAIM oppose, which possibility places your squarely in the fascist class.

FOUR fingers!

Oh, big tough man Harry. Watch out for Dirty Harry!! AAO Feb 2013 #1
Post removed Post removed Feb 2013 #2
Are you saying that Senator Leahy is not his own man? He opposed it too. What might that mean?nt patrice Feb 2013 #3
It means that he's an idiot as far as I'm concerned. JMHO! AAO Feb 2013 #4
Lex parsimoniae pscot Feb 2013 #12
Wow. way to collaborate, not. But then perhaps you're only a pawn, not granted patrice Feb 2013 #13
I'll pardon you, but I still think you're full of it. AAO Feb 2013 #15
Which one of us is posting under their real name, the probabilities are that you are the one patrice Feb 2013 #18
Probably 99% post under a pseudonym. So you're the only principiled DUer? AAO Feb 2013 #19
Did I say I am the only principled DUer? & Because most/many people do something, does patrice Feb 2013 #21
patrice, it would be nice if you could give me one question at a time. (smiley face) AAO Feb 2013 #24
It means that new blood is needed in the Senate Ian Iam Feb 2013 #26
Thanx a lot Harry Botany Feb 2013 #5
Still trying to confirm this but I believe I heard the Cspan announcer say the Sen. Susan Collins Purveyor Feb 2013 #6
Lots of drama about nothing. When the vote comes, there will be 75 votes BlueStreak Feb 2013 #8
Major Garrett ✔ @MajorCBS - I am reliably informed Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine... Purveyor Feb 2013 #10
Reid: I Won’t Honor Holds On Hagel Nomination Flashmann Feb 2013 #7
Harry has a spine that... ReRe Feb 2013 #9
Too Little, too late Harry. Blue Idaho Feb 2013 #11
I though it read "Too Little, too Harry" - and that sounded right to me. AAO Feb 2013 #20
Sen. Harry Lawnchair makes another in a series of useless, soon to be discarded threats . . . Journeyman Feb 2013 #14
I'll bet you he honors holds on Richard Cordrey. n/t denverbill Feb 2013 #16
Why dont we believe you Harry? nm rhett o rick Feb 2013 #17
Armed Serices Committee? oberliner Feb 2013 #22
Good for Harry. Cha Feb 2013 #23
I don't believe any damned Third Doctor Feb 2013 #25
I'm sure if the republicans blow Harry will fall trublu992 Feb 2013 #27
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Reid: I Won’t Honor Holds...»Reply #13