Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nauthiz

(44 posts)
7. Easy
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 08:31 PM
Feb 2013

Drones are operated remotely 24/7 by a group of people who constantly monitor whatever it is they're looking at. They just need to be refueled, you can have someone always at the helm watching. You actually have to have people in the helicopter.

Having someone in the helicopter and not thousands of miles away, from the standpoint of human psychology, is much different. Someone a thousand miles away has a much easier time pulling the trigger than someone right in the helicopter. These things are weapons and can be outfitted as such. Just because they say they won't be weaponized doesn't meant that won't change. I'm sure cops in helicopters carry weapons with them, so you'd probably make the argument that since cops in helicopters carry guns, it's fine that drones do the same thing.

The police can do their job just fine the way they have it now.

As far as trusting the police as an institution, I think that they pretty much go either way now. Ever since the first police beating has happened, there's no reason to give police this kind of power. At all.

Our stupid drug and immigration laws just need to be changed and you'd see much less need for police in general.

So if these drones arent armed exactly why were they a bad idea OP? cstanleytech Feb 2013 #1
Police Trust rsmith6621 Feb 2013 #2
How about instead you just toss a link up to a specific article you read? cstanleytech Feb 2013 #5
if you can't work teh google Great Cthulhu Feb 2013 #8
Oh I can work google just fine, what I cannot do is pretend to guess your viewpoint on cstanleytech Feb 2013 #9
Do your homework PSPS Feb 2013 #11
Thats "your" opinion and I can respect that but how do you know if that is the same reason cstanleytech Feb 2013 #13
Post removed Post removed Feb 2013 #17
No, I havent been busted for any of those reasons though judging by your reaction cstanleytech Feb 2013 #18
Don't bother to apologize. MIRT has removed the poster from our happy group. freshwest Feb 2013 #31
I wouldnt want them either nauthiz Feb 2013 #4
"comparing drones to helicopters, it's not the same thing." How do you figure that? cstanleytech Feb 2013 #6
Easy nauthiz Feb 2013 #7
Those reasons fail. cstanleytech Feb 2013 #10
Back at you nauthiz Feb 2013 #39
there are some comparisons, i'd hazard a guess farminator3000 Feb 2013 #23
The article posted by the OP states many of the reasons suffragette Feb 2013 #15
Thank you but my post wasnt asking cstanleytech Feb 2013 #16
The OP's answer to yo upthread is consistent with the reasons given in the articles suffragette Feb 2013 #19
You're wondering? Bullshit. You're challenging the OP's very normal idea that people don't want to ancianita Feb 2013 #21
No. I am asking whats the difference of unarmed drones vs manned helicopters. cstanleytech Feb 2013 #22
Heh heh. I and my nose really don't have a have to add to my own and others' adequate explanations. ancianita Feb 2013 #25
My apologies but do keep in mind please cstanleytech Feb 2013 #27
Yes. Of course. But satellites haven't also killed 4,700 people in the last four years, have they. ancianita Feb 2013 #28
Ah but these are unarmed drones not the armed ones. cstanleytech Feb 2013 #29
Why are you so obsessed with this matter? Ian Iam Feb 2013 #30
Sorry to bust your little conspiracy theory but nope. cstanleytech Feb 2013 #36
The price of freedom = eternal vigilance. Not worry. Not paranoia. Not fear. Vigilance. ancianita Feb 2013 #33
Pst, might wanna let Nasa in on that cstanleytech Feb 2013 #34
Maybe if the government hadn't used them the way they had... Ash_F Feb 2013 #32
You wont get any argument from me over that. cstanleytech Feb 2013 #35
NRA will be upset Katashi_itto Feb 2013 #3
With their newly-installed string of surveillance cameras, maybe they decided they weren't needed. PSPS Feb 2013 #12
Possible, more likely imo though its a PR issue do to the overuse of armed drones overseas. cstanleytech Feb 2013 #14
its PR, stock prices, and boys with toys. or girls with toys farminator3000 Feb 2013 #24
Do you know if Contego is among the vendors that SPD are returning their drones to? ancianita Feb 2013 #26
I forgot the right link in that previous post farminator3000 Feb 2013 #37
Thank you, much appreciated! ancianita Feb 2013 #38
K&R! Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #20
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»McGinn: SPD ending drone ...»Reply #7