Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

struggle4progress

(118,282 posts)

3. Be careful with that view of the scope of Federal law, or we may

Reply to bluestateguy (Reply #1)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 11:03 PM

Dec 2012

find ourselves back in that not-so-long-gone era in which some states claimed that the Federal Constitutional protection to freedom of speech was really only applicable on Federal property

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Feds still reviewing new (Washington) marijuana law, plan no action on eve of legalization [View all] Newsjock Dec 2012 OP

The feds have the right to ban it on federal property bluestateguy Dec 2012 #1

+++ 1,000 +++ n/t RKP5637 Dec 2012 #2

Be careful with that view of the scope of Federal law, or we may struggle4progress Dec 2012 #3

5 things about the law deanplc Feb 2013 #4