Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Princess Turandot

(4,787 posts)

2. 3-0 decision, in the 5th Circuit no less...

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Fri Mar 22, 2024, 05:42 AM

Mar 22

The case was first heard in East Texas, which seems odd, since the major companies that brought the initial case are primarily located in the Carolinas. Tobacco isn't cultivated in Texas. A Trump judge, but these regs came out during Trump's administration.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

FDA's graphic warning labels for cigarettes are constitutional, US appeals court rules [View all] BumRushDaShow Mar 22 OP

We have had health warnings on packets here for ages. Aussie105 Mar 22 #1

I remember when that type of labeling was first being debated by CTP (a Center within FDA) BumRushDaShow Mar 22 #4

More images... more warnings. Oopsie Daisy Mar 22 #6

3-0 decision, in the 5th Circuit no less... Princess Turandot Mar 22 #2

Judge shopping maxsolomon Mar 22 #9

Geez. Shareholder primacy capitalism never, ever rests. PatrickforB Mar 22 #3

Excellent. Cigarette smoking should be banned anyway. Or tax-tax-tax them out of existence! Oopsie Daisy Mar 22 #5

We are still debating this? Miguelito Loveless Mar 22 #7

FDA pictures of proposed warning labels: (graphic) sl8 Mar 22 #8

WTF? Goddamned tobacco companies are still fighting that and for the right to CousinIT Mar 22 #10