Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Coventina

(27,224 posts)
Mon Sep 12, 2016, 05:51 PM Sep 2016

Obama to Veto Bill Allowing 9/11 Lawsuits Against Saudi Arabia [View all]

Source: New York Times

WASHINGTON — The White House said on Monday that President Obama would veto legislation approved by Congress that would allow the families of victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks to sue Saudi Arabia for any role in the plot, escalating a bipartisan dispute with lawmakers over the measure.

Josh Earnest, the White House press secretary, said Mr. Obama “does intend to veto this legislation,” and would work to persuade lawmakers in both parties to change course. If he cannot, the measure could lead to the first veto override of his presidency, as the legislation drew the backing of lopsided majorities in both the House and Senate.

“The president feels quite strongly about this,” Mr. Earnest said of the legislation, which Mr. Obama has said could dangerously undermine the United States’ interests globally, opening the country to a raft of lawsuits by private citizens overseas.

“The concept of sovereign immunity is one that protects the United States as much as any other country in the world,” Mr. Earnest said, referring to the rationale behind a 1976 law that gives other countries broad immunity from American lawsuits. “It’s not hard to imagine other countries using this law as an excuse to haul U.S. diplomats or U.S. service members, or even U.S. companies, into courts around the world.”

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/13/us/politics/obama-veto-saudi-arabia-9-11.html?_r=0



Disappointing....
44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Please don't do this, Mr. President. forest444 Sep 2016 #1
And when citizens of foreign countries atreides1 Sep 2016 #14
And when Trump wins thanks to this misguided veto, with GOP majorities in the House and Senate, forest444 Sep 2016 #20
I thought you were being sarcastic YankmeCrankme Sep 2016 #21
Well said. Because besides being wrong, this veto is just pointless. forest444 Sep 2016 #28
If the lobbyists wanted the bill to fail, it wouldn't have passed overwhelmingly democrattotheend Sep 2016 #33
Wait - think about this for a moment - listen - asiliveandbreathe Sep 2016 #2
I agree metroins Sep 2016 #4
I just hope it is veto proof - reading the asiliveandbreathe Sep 2016 #6
The selectivity of Globalization right there. cprise Sep 2016 #16
It's all about understanding the impact of such a law underthematrix Sep 2016 #3
He needs to understand the impact of 2 747's into the sides of buildings, funded and manned by Sauds grahamhgreen Sep 2016 #10
Just because some involved were citizens of that nation does not mean the nation is at fault. cstanleytech Sep 2016 #15
Well, that's what a suit will determine YankmeCrankme Sep 2016 #23
No, this law would let the people sue the Saudi government regardless and thats why it needs to be cstanleytech Sep 2016 #30
Ambassador Bandar was the point man for all JonLP24 Sep 2016 #36
He does. However he's takes the long view on how it would impact Americans underthematrix Sep 2016 #17
This administration has unintended us into 8 more years in Iraq. We know Iraq was innocent in 9-11, grahamhgreen Sep 2016 #40
Talk to the white GOP President who got us into this mess underthematrix Sep 2016 #41
Ok vadermike Sep 2016 #5
Oh, now don't say that - we have laws on the books asiliveandbreathe Sep 2016 #9
My life is literally on the line underthematrix Sep 2016 #18
Obama will not have to answer for this... Jason1961 Sep 2016 #7
How can Congress decree such lawsuits? treestar Sep 2016 #8
There is no marble falls Sep 2016 #37
Murder as a criminal charge treestar Sep 2016 #38
"Such lawsuits" would enable them to grab Saudi assets held in American banks (to answer treestar) ColemanMaskell Sep 2016 #42
they'd be civil and there is always a statute of limitations treestar Sep 2016 #44
There is no way he. deathrind Sep 2016 #11
Asinine, embarrassing bill. It should have never been sent to the Presidents' desk. Auggie Sep 2016 #12
Yet Obama has no problem with lawsuits against Iran for the same thing Jake Stern Sep 2016 #13
Except the Iranian government was providing aid back then and thus is culpable but in this case cstanleytech Sep 2016 #19
Then let the families have their day in court Jake Stern Sep 2016 #31
So your expecting Saudi Arabia to prove it had nothing to do with it? Its not up to them to prove cstanleytech Sep 2016 #32
Innocent until proven guilty is for criminal cases. Preponderance of evidence for civil cases. ColemanMaskell Sep 2016 #43
yep stupidicus Sep 2016 #24
A moronic, grandstanding bill alcibiades_mystery Sep 2016 #22
I totally agree. The President is almost always several moves ahead when it comes to complicated truthisfreedom Sep 2016 #26
well, that's what being a rogue state with a history of war crimes should result in stupidicus Sep 2016 #25
The Republicans want this? forgotmylogin Sep 2016 #27
I would think so Bradical79 Sep 2016 #35
A sensible veto of not so sensible legislation. n/t Little Tich Sep 2016 #29
It makes sense as President of the U.S. Bradical79 Sep 2016 #34
Well, Obama probably knows more than we do how exposed the US would be William Seger Sep 2016 #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama to Veto Bill Allowi...