Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(1,668 posts)

17. No it wasn't

Mon Jul 11, 2016, 12:08 PM

Jul 2016

You are reading that into the post. You are accusing someone of a personal attack where there was none.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

29 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Pressure grows on Clinton aides to lose security clearances [View all] DonViejo Jul 2016 OP

They are goners, IMO... Helen Borg Jul 2016 #1

yes, the mighty all powerful Chuck Grassley (R-Liar)! will make it so emulatorloo Jul 2016 #9

Chuck Grassley, for one. Wilms Jul 2016 #3

Well, that settles it then. The Iowa idiot's word is MIGHTY... Surya Gayatri Jul 2016 #6

^^^AMEN to this!^^^ Surya Gayatri Jul 2016 #7

The hill should change it's name to the h.a.g. Ohioblue22 Jul 2016 #4

State has picked up its investigation into the matter following morningfog Jul 2016 #5

The security clearance issue is a real problem. seabeckind Jul 2016 #8

FBI director says Clinton did not lie, break law in email handling. emulatorloo Jul 2016 #11

Not a matter of legality. seabeckind Jul 2016 #13

I did not smear you, unclear why you felt the need to smear me emulatorloo Jul 2016 #14

That wasn't a smear. seabeckind Jul 2016 #15

Thinly veiled implication was that I am ignorant and unprincipled emulatorloo Jul 2016 #16

No it wasn't fbc Jul 2016 #17

Nothing they posted read like it was a smear directed at you in any form. cstanleytech Jul 2016 #18

No GummyBearz Jul 2016 #19

Thanks. There was no smear intended. seabeckind Jul 2016 #23

Not A Scab crosinski Jul 2016 #20

Whether the marking was in error or not doesn't enter into it. seabeckind Jul 2016 #21

Specific Allegations crosinski Jul 2016 #24

I have no intention of discussing specifics seabeckind Jul 2016 #25

Ok, but maybe we have misunderstood each other. crosinski Jul 2016 #26

I took off the reference. seabeckind Jul 2016 #27

It depends on who decides. crosinski Jul 2016 #28

Had to go get my blood sludge tested. seabeckind Jul 2016 #29

Yep. Lying lies and the liars who tell them emulatorloo Jul 2016 #12

Ignore Republican drama & distractions Sunlei Jul 2016 #22