Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
52. Let Me Guess...Another Clinton Group Member With Liberal In Their Name
Thu May 26, 2016, 11:03 AM
May 2016

Is that a requirement? People are pointing out all over DU that anyone with left, liberal or dem in their name posts most in the Clinton group. Just curious because I find their point of view to be the least liberal and most centrist on here.

Moving along, the truth rolls MrMickeysMom May 2016 #1
2nd cousin to the "Flying Fickle Finger of Fate"? n/t 24601 May 2016 #4
whatever, too late triron May 2016 #69
I see all you new posters like "LBN"... MrMickeysMom May 2016 #72
It sure isn't the 30% plus Sanders needs. still_one May 2016 #2
Patience... MrMickeysMom May 2016 #6
I live in California, and I was doing phone banking last weekend Those folks who have been still_one May 2016 #8
Yep! Many of those votes are already in the bank. LiberalFighter May 2016 #15
Let Me Guess...Another Clinton Group Member With Liberal In Their Name billhicks76 May 2016 #52
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service Orrex May 2016 #60
Wow. Cant Even Point Out Something I Caught billhicks76 May 2016 #80
Alerting Orrex May 2016 #81
Have A Somber Memorial Day billhicks76 May 2016 #90
Count me in the unabashed, unapologetic, flaming, bleeding-heart group. libdem4life May 2016 #88
Thank You billhicks76 May 2016 #91
It isn't the win a frontrunner going to the convention needs either Omaha Steve May 2016 #24
Sure it is. Darb May 2016 #26
IF she can't get a convincing win in BLUE CA Omaha Steve May 2016 #28
Uhhhhh, is this a primary, or the election? Darb May 2016 #32
the ole Boogy Man will get me If i vote for hillary? Cryptoad May 2016 #38
Not the Boogy Man! ffr May 2016 #53
I believe the quote is inchhigh May 2016 #27
It is early Omaha Steve May 2016 #29
I've been on DU since 2004 but inchhigh May 2016 #40
Sanders could win by 40% and it wouldn't be enough. The nominee will be determined.... George II May 2016 #49
Do you see how nicely you've set up your belief system? Orrex May 2016 #59
How specifically has Clinton "cheated"? Do YOU see how nicely you've set up YOUR belief system? George II May 2016 #61
Oh please. Orrex May 2016 #63
Oh, I thought you were being serious. Of course she hasn't cheated.... George II May 2016 #64
Wait--we're on the same page?!? Orrex May 2016 #65
How are you calculating that? Samantha May 2016 #68
Are you new to this whole thing? GulfCoast66 May 2016 #73
Kind of -- I have only been a political junkie for 50 years now Samantha May 2016 #74
If white voters favor Clinton by 6 points, and Hispanics by 9, then why is she only ahead by 2? pnwmom May 2016 #3
When I did phone banking for Hillary last weekend, in that event, a most of the folks I spoke with still_one May 2016 #7
Since the vast majority of Californians are white or Hispanic, it seems odd pnwmom May 2016 #9
Survey USA a couple of days ago had Hillary 57, Sanders 39. A couple more polls would be nice to still_one May 2016 #13
It's sometimes hard to tell by last name who is Hispanic. cannabis_flower May 2016 #23
I agree. Also, it is purely anectodel, since the peple I was calling may not be a valid reflection still_one May 2016 #55
But I just don't get the math of this one. The gap between the candidates is pnwmom May 2016 #34
agree. a few more polls will give a tread. Much better. riversedge May 2016 #42
I've been a democrat for 14 years now. ThinkCritically May 2016 #83
This poll has a MOE of 5.7, about as big a MOE as I've ever seen in a poll. George II May 2016 #50
Interesting. I wonder what their turnout model was? (nt) Recursion May 2016 #5
As Eddie Izzard says. Bad Dog May 2016 #10
Except Sanders needs 100%, anything less is a loss for Sanders. Thinkingabout May 2016 #11
As Hillary is being hauled away in a paddy wagon, the super delegates will be scratching their heads Pauldg47 May 2016 #75
This will happen shortly after the FEC charges Sanders with campaign fund fraud, interesting Thinkingabout May 2016 #76
Ha....this would have been exposed big time monthes ago....I beg you to vote for the Bern!!!!! Pauldg47 May 2016 #77
It has been exposed, second letter listing donations which goes over the limit of $2700, guess some Thinkingabout May 2016 #78
It's all over the news. Pauldg47 May 2016 #82
Interesting that you care about that considering... ThinkCritically May 2016 #84
Yes, she has attended fund raisers for down ticket candidates, do you know how much Thinkingabout May 2016 #85
Call it, Skinner!!! Cooley Hurd May 2016 #12
If history is an indicator (with regard to polls in this election) Rafale May 2016 #14
The Hillary phone banks probably target voters who already have expressed a JDPriestly May 2016 #17
Thanks! Rafale May 2016 #18
I think it differs from county to county. JDPriestly May 2016 #20
Thank you for all the hard work you are doing Samantha May 2016 #87
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #92
This message was self-deleted by its author Turbineguy May 2016 #16
There are relatively few Republicans in California. JDPriestly May 2016 #21
No wonder she zentrum May 2016 #19
maybe but not at previous debates. Mary Mac May 2016 #22
You trust Brit Hume? Chris Wallace is questionable as well. Anything on Faux is anti Democratic redstateblues May 2016 #30
Brit Hume is the WORST! Zen Democrat May 2016 #67
IOW Sanders loses... brooklynite May 2016 #25
Well, the argument can be made ... Fantastic Anarchist May 2016 #36
But he can't... brooklynite May 2016 #45
It doesn't matter.. mountain grammy May 2016 #31
The numbers make no sense whatsoever: CrowCityDem May 2016 #33
Thank you! I asked this question above, but no one else seems to see the problem. pnwmom May 2016 #35
I didn't read every line of it, but I didn't see anything about that, no. CrowCityDem May 2016 #39
Hah,,,, Cryptoad May 2016 #37
I thought she was eighteen points up only a few days ago. Gene Debs May 2016 #41
It could be the news of the recent State Department findings against her. forest444 May 2016 #43
We shall see what happens YankeeBravo May 2016 #44
I'll be right beside you chwaliszewski May 2016 #47
The Truth in black & White: Clinton=1705 Sanders=1414 (SNOPES) askeptic May 2016 #46
+1 chwaliszewski May 2016 #48
Yea like Oregon? One poll had Hillary up by 15 when all the others were Thekaspervote May 2016 #51
A win in California would make their work much more difficult. pa28 May 2016 #54
I wonder why people are ignoring the poll that came out the SAME day that shows.... George II May 2016 #56
You can believe Public Policy Institute of Cal or Washington Times askeptic May 2016 #57
I let a reputable organization like Project538 do the methodology assessment, and they find... George II May 2016 #58
The polling sample... LenaBaby61 May 2016 #62
Wha? Bernie was behind 18 points just last week! Zen Democrat May 2016 #66
Horrendous Optics for Hillary merkins May 2016 #70
We Donated to Sanders Again Yesterday McKim May 2016 #71
I live in So Cal. and see no enthusiasm for LibDemAlways May 2016 #79
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow May 2016 #86
Keeping it kicked Amorka May 2016 #89
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #93
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #94
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #95
Kicking nt LiberalElite Jun 2016 #96
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #97
Just joined in the middle of the night? LiberalElite Jun 2016 #98
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #99
"Dead heat" Bubry Jun 2016 #100
After the AP told Bernie voters to stay home... Omaha Steve Jun 2016 #101
Dead heat? She us ahead by double digits.... apcalc Jun 2016 #102
The AP's call for Hillary Clinton ruined California's election party--and here’s why that matters Omaha Steve Jun 2016 #103
Or Hillary supporters stayed home because she already won-- That fake outrage works both ways snooper2 Jun 2016 #105
Looks like the cards fell differently Vogon_Glory Jun 2016 #104
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Poll: Clinton and Sanders...»Reply #52