Latest Breaking News

Omaha Steve

(99,896 posts)

65. It has been used in LBN before by me

Reply to Brother Joe Observes (Reply #63)

Mon May 23, 2016, 12:15 AM

May 2016

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014974916

And others: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141428802

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141436574

How many do you need?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

124 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump Beats Clinton for First Time in Average of Recent Polls [View all] Omaha Steve May 2016 OP

Seem like a sure thing. Just ask President McCain and President Romney. nt onehandle May 2016 #1

I hope your confidence is well placed. NutmegYankee May 2016 #19

I dont buy the poll either, but your analogy is disgusting 7962 May 2016 #36

Don't expect an apology. NutmegYankee May 2016 #84

I didnt really expect one. 7962 May 2016 #86

Odd, you weren't here then. Kingofalldems May 2016 #88

Sure, here ya go sparky! 7962 May 2016 #93

Looks like half a dozen people who aren't here anymore. Kingofalldems May 2016 #97

Well, it WAS a dozen yrs ago. Even today I see some go missing 7962 May 2016 #99

A lot of innocent Iraqis were "rounded up" and murdered. So maybe its true. liberalnarb May 2016 #106

Totally different topic than being discussed here, as you know. 7962 May 2016 #108

Regardless, liberalnarb May 2016 #109

And Hillary in 08. Dustlawyer May 2016 #26

Comparing Hillary to Obama. Calista241 May 2016 #30

lets just win the primary, Kokonoe May 2016 #64

yeah cheating is so easy PatrynXX May 2016 #72

That's the key Hillarians are ignoring. HooptieWagon May 2016 #102

Horse Shit BigDemVoter May 2016 #120

Good luck with that plan. HooptieWagon May 2016 #121

Both of those candidates were behind in the polls at this point. They lost. tabasco May 2016 #101

Maybe you haven't noticed but Hillary and Obama are two different people. liberalnarb May 2016 #107

If only someone could have predicted this. n/t Jester Messiah May 2016 #2

Shocking, isn't it? derpderpderp May 2016 #5

and so it begins AgerolanAmerican May 2016 #3

Thanks for the reminder! Person 2713 May 2016 #31

You can come over here to South Korea and I'll help you get set up teaching davidpdx May 2016 #82

So, they think that Trump isn't qualified, but they prefer him over Hillary.... virtualobserver May 2016 #4

and yet rtracey May 2016 #13

Sanders is losing because, unlike these polls... thesquanderer May 2016 #15

Bull shit. Dems elect Dems snd a Republicans elect Republicans. wisteria May 2016 #58

No BS. The question was how Sanders could be losing, with the poll numbers in the OP. thesquanderer May 2016 #62

The problem is that independents like Bernie.....and they don't like Hillary...... virtualobserver May 2016 #16

And independents don't cast protest votes. Calista241 May 2016 #33

I don't believe the "Sanders is losing" mantra for a minute AgerolanAmerican May 2016 #23

So because your guy isn't winning the elections are full of fraud? Chicago1980 May 2016 #28

Other way around AgerolanAmerican May 2016 #38

No lancer78 May 2016 #76

No he wouldn't. Democrats don't vote for him. wisteria May 2016 #60

THAT is some premium grade bullshit. Bye! nt stillwaiting May 2016 #100

Primary voters do not determine the winner of a general election. Ikonoklast May 2016 #35

the teevee gnewz WANTS it this way. less werk. pansypoo53219 May 2016 #40

He Is Winning SouthernDemLinda May 2016 #69

This formula is only going to get you so far, and then... Miles Archer May 2016 #92

I suspect this is largely due to the bump he got when Cruz dropped out and that it will fade once cstanleytech May 2016 #73

your theory doesn't explain why Bernie kicks Trump's ass virtualobserver May 2016 #79

Kinda says it all, doesn't it? Bernie is the only one who can save us... InAbLuEsTaTe May 2016 #80

Different "theys". Igel May 2016 #98

"but that's only because Sanders!" MisterP May 2016 #6

South Park was right. Giant Douche v. Turd Sandwich Feeling the Bern May 2016 #7

We've been telling them this ALL ALONG retrowire May 2016 #10

I think this is..... Delver Rootnose May 2016 #46

Fuck. nt retrowire May 2016 #8

Your giddyness is showing. Eventhough it will be short lived. nt William769 May 2016 #9

Your apathy is showing. And that's dangerous in this era. nt retrowire May 2016 #11

Doesn't mean I'm not voting, but a Giant Douche v. a Turd Sandwich is not much of a choice Feeling the Bern May 2016 #12

Clinton isn't evil. Chicago1980 May 2016 #29

She's inviting Bushco into the party Hydra May 2016 #41

So the enabler of evil now? Chicago1980 May 2016 #47

Oh, enabling evil by her is not new Hydra May 2016 #57

On FULL display in this video. bvar22 May 2016 #110

No shit! nt sheshe2 May 2016 #21

It will be interesting to see what happens when we have only one candidate. Tal Vez May 2016 #14

ugh.. Ash_F May 2016 #17

K&R silvershadow May 2016 #18

clinton sanders 2016 captainarizona May 2016 #20

Or she can pick Warren. Chicago1980 May 2016 #32

Never happen. All eyes must be on HER 7962 May 2016 #39

Enlighten me. Chicago1980 May 2016 #43

She will only pick someone who checks boxes & doesnt take away attention. 7962 May 2016 #87

Warren is not interested. libdem4life May 2016 #116

#6, an there's that too!! 7962 May 2016 #117

Reagan Bush the father ...didn't seem to hurt them to get together Person 2713 May 2016 #44

No. wisteria May 2016 #61

A more appealing nominee would be trouncing this unqualified lummox. BlueStater May 2016 #22

While true, the same can be said for him Reter May 2016 #49

Bernie Sanders beats Kasich, too. It isn't the landslide win that he has against Trump, though. (nt) w4rma May 2016 #89

Bunk. It will be a landslide for Hillary. Darb May 2016 #24

You're delusional, Darb. She's costing us the Presidency and all the down ticket races. (nt) w4rma May 2016 #90

Uh, no, she isn't costing us those things in any way. Darb May 2016 #124

Glad I'm not a down-ticket Dem candidate in 2016. Bodych May 2016 #25

So what if she was on a board of directors of Wal-Mart. Chicago1980 May 2016 #34

They were virulently anti-Union then. Hillary said nothing then. Ikonoklast May 2016 #37

Maybe the workers should do something about that then... Chicago1980 May 2016 #51

Hard to organize when Walmart is a well known union buster. Omaha Steve May 2016 #91

+1 nt laundry_queen May 2016 #122

Open your eyes Bodych May 2016 #42

I don't care if she made money from speeches. Chicago1980 May 2016 #50

You seem very blind to me. Bodych May 2016 #56

Awwww.... ReRe May 2016 #53

Dead man walking FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #27

Sorry, but did you not recently lock a thread in "LBN" because it was about a poll? George II May 2016 #45

I locked a poll in LBN? Omaha Steve May 2016 #48

You also locked at least two other posts okasha May 2016 #114

And opened one up Omaha Steve May 2016 #115

President Dukakis always says GE polls in May are double plus good. nt BootinUp May 2016 #52

A single GE poll in May means nothing angrychair May 2016 #94

All polls in May are done IN MAY BootinUp May 2016 #95

That is because Reoublicans are excepting Trump as their nominee wisteria May 2016 #54

Maybe the biggest thing is that both are viewed unfavorably by 57% of people. That is news. She has thereismore May 2016 #55

People Allergic To Clinton's and Bushes billhicks76 May 2016 #59

Telesur? Brother Joe Observes May 2016 #63

It has been used in LBN before by me Omaha Steve May 2016 #65

I had never heard of it before Brother Joe Observes May 2016 #68

None taken Omaha Steve May 2016 #70

Thanks to Sanders Gman May 2016 #66

The 2008 Democratic Primary Was Far Nastier Than 2016’s Omaha Steve May 2016 #67

Giving people a voice in the primaries seems like a decent thing to do at this stage. PoliticalMalcontent May 2016 #71

If independents want a say Gman May 2016 #74

It's interesting. A lot of folks did try to join the party this year. PoliticalMalcontent May 2016 #77

People have been consistenly recognizing both the positive and negative with Secretary Clinton Babel_17 May 2016 #75

When Bernie throws his support to hillary gwheezie May 2016 #78

Then you obviously know nothing about his supporters. Dawgs May 2016 #118

I am getting pissed. the blacks got a wonerdfultop notch FIRST black president. i have to pansypoo53219 May 2016 #81

Well put pansypoo davidpdx May 2016 #83

Please people factor in the voting machines! Stevepol May 2016 #85

I vacillate RussBLib May 2016 #112

Telesur to spin my polls? No thx uhnope May 2016 #96

It has been used before Omaha Steve May 2016 #103

but it shouldn't be uhnope May 2016 #111

Do you see anything in the story you feel is incorrect? Omaha Steve May 2016 #123

Again! Helen Borg May 2016 #104

A strong Democratic candidate would be leading 70 to 30, with just the usual diehard tabasco May 2016 #105

meaningless this far out MosheFeingold May 2016 #113

Doesn't mean diarrhea in a dishwasher. . . BigDemVoter May 2016 #119