Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: 13-Year-Old With Replica Gun Shot By Baltimore Police Officers [View all]cstanleytech
(26,310 posts)61. I wouldnt object to them doing that but again you then run into the 2nd amendment issues
and thats assuming you could even get the Republicans who control Congress to pass such a law but even if they did it will be challenged in court and given the current makeup of SCOTUS I wouldnt be willing to wager any money on it surviving.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
107 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You mean did the officer have to have license? Yes and the same for a background check.
cstanleytech
Apr 2016
#49
The case will be decided years hence and may have little to do with the facts. Sorry, that happens.
mpcamb
Apr 2016
#66
The replicas look just as real...my point was more parents might want to keep real looking guns..
EX500rider
Apr 2016
#20
I've seen some of those replicas. They're virtually identical to real pistols.
Francis Booth
Apr 2016
#24
Hell no, that wasn't my meaning at all. They shouldn't use deadly force until it's clear it's
Francis Booth
Apr 2016
#30
I think the burden of risk should be on the police. They signed up for it when the put on the badge
Francis Booth
Apr 2016
#100
"I think the burden of risk should be on the police. They signed up for it"
Angel Martin
Apr 2016
#104
Police are unique. We give them guns. We give them body armor. We give them the power
Francis Booth
May 2016
#105
Assuming the article is accurate he still had the supposed "gun" in his hand thus
cstanleytech
Apr 2016
#51
Thank you. Apparently in the minds of some who weren't there, the cop should have intuitively
raccoon
Apr 2016
#87
Well its a good idea but you just know there will be some idiots who will spray paint them to make
cstanleytech
Apr 2016
#54
I wouldnt object to them doing that but again you then run into the 2nd amendment issues
cstanleytech
Apr 2016
#61
"I also hope he recovers and that an investigation into the shooting happens." Agree 100% there. nt
cstanleytech
Apr 2016
#55
Better to more accurately read the hour, and so advise ourselves and our children . . .
Journeyman
Apr 2016
#11
Thats only if the kid actually held onto it, if he did then my money is on the officer probably
cstanleytech
Apr 2016
#58
The harm is potential harm to others from a handgun after being given a lawful order to stop.
jtuck004
Apr 2016
#56
It's not logic, it's black-letter law. He was given an order to drop the weapon. He got shot for
jtuck004
Apr 2016
#89
"Has committed a felony involving the use or threat of deadly forc" The moment he refused to
jtuck004
Apr 2016
#98
A pretty good bet especially given that as of the 2010 census 63.7% of the population was.
cstanleytech
Apr 2016
#68