Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

branford

(4,462 posts)
45. What would his resignation accomplish?
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:42 PM
Feb 2016

It would not change the law, and it would be quite easy to find someone to replace him.

Moreover, the law currently allows some discretion on where to permit guns on campus. If you've followed the story, you know that the president of the university tried to implement the law too allow for the minimum area of the campus to allow guns and still be compliant with the statute. If the president resigned, it's quite probable his replacement would be chosen to ensure even more areas of the campus allowed firearms. Similarly, such a political act could also backfire spectacularly, and the legislature could decide to simply mandate that guns be allowed in all locations on campus.

If you do not favor guns on campus, the president of the university should be lauded as an ally who's actually balancing his beliefs about campus safety with complying with the duly passed law.

Moreover, the only students that will be permitted to carry firearms are those who are already 21 and possess a CCL. This very small sliver of the student body hardly presents a true demonstrable threat, particularly since many other universities already allow guns on campus and they are not running red with blood, no less from this demographic group.

This means more dead students. Guaranteed. nt valerief Feb 2016 #1
Guaranteed how? TeddyR Feb 2016 #2
It didn't happen in other states that passed similar laws. hack89 Feb 2016 #4
If so, then why hasn't it happened at the many other colleges in other states GGJohn Feb 2016 #31
A good question which will remain unanswered by the antigun 'Colonists' in this thread friendly_iconoclast Feb 2016 #44
That question has been asked (and dodged) for at least five years at DU: friendly_iconoclast Feb 2016 #50
As a Texan and a Longhorn alum and donor rjsquirrel Feb 2016 #3
How do guns on campus TeddyR Feb 2016 #7
Guns on campus rjsquirrel Feb 2016 #13
Isn't this a state law that he has to comply with? Calista241 Feb 2016 #35
And now you're on rjsquirrel Feb 2016 #14
a great way to rebut am argument Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #26
Thank you on behalf of human beings. The world needs people who won't look the other way. n/t Judi Lynn Feb 2016 #21
It seems you are punishing the wrong party here. NutmegYankee Feb 2016 #24
Not at all rjsquirrel Feb 2016 #25
"It's Mexico with shittier food and meaner people." Wow. beevul Feb 2016 #33
Wow indeed sarisataka Feb 2016 #39
So is racism in Texas sarisataka Feb 2016 #40
It's a toxic mix houston16revival Feb 2016 #5
you do know you have to be 21 Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #27
And this makes all carriers houston16revival Feb 2016 #30
No more than a drivers license... beevul Feb 2016 #34
There is no room for ambiguity in your mind houston16revival Feb 2016 #36
Bull. beevul Feb 2016 #41
And please note the 8-1-2016 effective date of this guns-on-campus ruling. Paladin Feb 2016 #6
Thanks for pointing out the significance of the effective date. It's important. n/t Judi Lynn Feb 2016 #22
you also remember it was civilians Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #28
Does anyone that opposes this change TeddyR Feb 2016 #8
I'm a college teacher and I don't want any fucking guns in my classroom. 6000eliot Feb 2016 #16
Can't imagine the added problems. It will be hell for ordinary students. School's not the place. Judi Lynn Feb 2016 #19
how would you know? Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #29
I know they aren't allowed now. 6000eliot Feb 2016 #32
What about a student who is carrying illegally? hack89 Feb 2016 #38
I'm not going to have this stupid gun-nut non-argument. 6000eliot Feb 2016 #51
You are into security theater. I get it hack89 Feb 2016 #52
Expect to get blocked. 6000eliot Feb 2016 #55
Enjoy your perfect world. Nt hack89 Feb 2016 #56
Your loss, not his. Feel free to block me or not as you see fit. friendly_iconoclast Feb 2016 #61
I cannot even imagine... ananda Feb 2016 #9
Would a law stop a real crazy willing to carry a gun illegally? hack89 Feb 2016 #15
Thanks for your post. Right-wingers do lack discipline, lack wisdom, lack clarity. Judi Lynn Feb 2016 #20
I know. ananda Feb 2016 #46
Another victory for the gun masturbators. navarth Feb 2016 #10
University of Texas reluctantly to allow guns in classrooms Judi Lynn Feb 2016 #11
Hmm. davidthegnome Feb 2016 #12
Shit. n/t Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #17
Save the drama. 21 year old college students have been able to own guns for Kang Colby Feb 2016 #18
gun humping cowards have won Skittles Feb 2016 #23
Oh, there's certainly paranoia- and it's coming from the firearms-averse friendly_iconoclast Feb 2016 #43
The pro-gun militancy movement has been fueled by raw paranoia for decades. Paladin Feb 2016 #48
There has been an evidence-free moral panic about the subject of the OP *for years* friendly_iconoclast Feb 2016 #49
I was in Austin on 8-1-1966. I had friends who lost family to Charles Whitman. Paladin Feb 2016 #53
you forget about the civilians with weapons that help Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #54
"By the way, it was a bolt-action rifle........" pablo_marmol Feb 2016 #59
Factose intolerance is part and parcel of modern gun control advocacy friendly_iconoclast Feb 2016 #63
What additional law would have prevented Whitman from killing all of those people? pablo_marmol Feb 2016 #57
This message was self-deleted by its author friendly_iconoclast Feb 2016 #60
I predicted obfuscating replies like yours *years* ago. From the link that you didn't read: friendly_iconoclast Feb 2016 #62
MoFo november3rd Feb 2016 #37
What would his resignation accomplish? branford Feb 2016 #45
Do people really fear an armed staff and faculty? ManiacJoe Feb 2016 #42
There's a history of moral panic-mongering about the subject at DU: friendly_iconoclast Feb 2016 #47
Foaming, irrational poutrage collides with the facts -- and the facts triumph. pablo_marmol Feb 2016 #58
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»University of Texas head ...»Reply #45