Latest Breaking News

pablo_marmol

(2,375 posts)

133. "Welcome to my ignore list."

Reply to vkkv (Reply #124)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 04:40 AM

Jan 2016

Translation: I can't deal with the content of your argument, so I'm taking my toy trucks and going home.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

156 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

President Obama Targets Gun Show Loophole in New Executive Actions [View all] Omaha Steve Jan 2016 OP

OMG HE IS GRABBING OUR GUNS Skittles Jan 2016 #1

Anything that can be done is better than what we have now. salib Jan 2016 #2

problems are Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #4

So there is no such thing as the "Gun show loophole"? salib Jan 2016 #11

there is no gun show loophole Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #14

So, from what you say salib Jan 2016 #19

you are indeed incorrect. Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #24

However, doesn't this change and broaden the group of people who salib Jan 2016 #30

it depends if he changes the definition of dealer Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #36

Private sales DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #83

Problem with your "argument" is that private sales can occur **ANYWHERE**. pablo_marmol Jan 2016 #90

thank you Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #96

Not arguring DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #103

Indeed they can Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #107

"You can accuse me of lying, that's fine. I don't care what you think." pablo_marmol Jan 2016 #127

Please proceed to flail and fail. pablo_marmol Jan 2016 #131

Not exactly Duckhunter, in some states, if background checks are not completed in THREE DAYS vkkv Jan 2016 #27

yes that is the option of the dealer Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #38

The three-day waiting time is the time the government has to return results of the check. Igel Jan 2016 #57

Roof's background check wasn't finished by the regulatory agency in the prescribed time... vkkv Jan 2016 #59

10 days worked real well Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #63

3 days worked fine in 1994 when the law was written? Travis_0004 Jan 2016 #82

That's the gun show loop hole DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #79

Nope. pablo_marmol Jan 2016 #91

this Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #98

Even some supporters of gun restriction are dumping your talking point. pablo_marmol Jan 2016 #129

People dislike the name because it's not a "loophole" and has nothing to do with gun shows Recursion Jan 2016 #84

Horseshit DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #89

Horseshit Recursion Jan 2016 #93

You claim to be a Marine DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #105

simply wrong in your description Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #108

Glad you've come around to agreeing with me Recursion Jan 2016 #109

that is horseshit Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #97

I don't have to link DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #104

it is also because I am correct Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #106

"Cause I don't give a shit what you think." pablo_marmol Jan 2016 #135

Yeah......too bad, so sad. The horseshit comes from you. pablo_marmol Jan 2016 #130

I never said it was a good name DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #141

"You guys like to dismiss any non-gun person over terminology." pablo_marmol Jan 2016 #144

Feel free to go check. DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #149

What the hell are you talking about? pablo_marmol Jan 2016 #150

truth matters and Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #153

If you are not a "dealer" because you only sell on occassion, you can still drape a confederate flag Hoyt Jan 2016 #28

nobody denies Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #39

You can set up a table at a gun show and sell to yahoos who can't pass a background check. Hoyt Jan 2016 #71

It's not as easy as that Hoyt, GGJohn Jan 2016 #73

GG, it is not illegal if you don't do it often enough to be deemed a dealer. I could go to a gun Hoyt Jan 2016 #76

Reading comprehension is your friend Hoyt. GGJohn Jan 2016 #77

Fact is, it is not illegal for anyone to do what I just said. It's actually pretty easy. Rent a Hoyt Jan 2016 #95

You obviously haven't been to too many gun shows Hoyt. eom. GGJohn Jan 2016 #99

Been to enough to know attendees are mostly white wingers with a lot of hatred. Hoyt Jan 2016 #111

. trillion Jan 2016 #122

I wish we could treat guns like cars Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #126

I'm for universal background checks with no loopholes. trillion Jan 2016 #145

I see you did not answer my question Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #148

not worried Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #3

But bad optics for the lancer78 Jan 2016 #80

Could be. pablo_marmol Jan 2016 #92

Pres Clinton cut the number of Dealer FFL's issued elmac Jan 2016 #5

online sales that cross state lines Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #7

I undersatand but a non licensee can purchase local from a yard sale, a friend, ect... elmac Jan 2016 #21

if that person ships out of state Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #25

Homeland Security will be replacing the F in ATF sooner than gun humpers think. onehandle Jan 2016 #6

To what, Alcohol, Tobacco and Forearms? vkkv Jan 2016 #8

bolt and pump action are Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #10

I see little reason for more than a five round magazine. vkkv Jan 2016 #17

why the AR Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #20

The AR platform is an exceptional hunting rifle, GGJohn Jan 2016 #22

I have a right to express my opinion and vote accordingly given the opportunity - vkkv Jan 2016 #33

My firearms are NOT for fighting the govt, that's just ludicrous. GGJohn Jan 2016 #37

my AR style rifles Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #41

"I have a right to express my opinion..........." pablo_marmol Jan 2016 #134

I'd say "high capacity" is more rounds than "standard capacity" jmowreader Jan 2016 #35

How so? mwrguy Jan 2016 #13

Really? GGJohn Jan 2016 #15

President Obama: NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #58

With snarky comments alone, I can see how one could get up to over 104 thousand posts vkkv Jan 2016 #9

so true, lol Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #12

Full fact sheet on the Executive Action here.... Kang Colby Jan 2016 #16

thanks Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #18

Not a moment too soon. forest444 Jan 2016 #23

too bad it will have almost no effect Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #26

You may be right that it will take stronger action to get gunners to stop their perverse behavior. Hoyt Jan 2016 #31

LOLOLOLOLOL GGJohn Jan 2016 #32

Once again, excess in gun acquisition and gun promotion, as you have admitted to, is not helping Hoyt Jan 2016 #34

Once again Hoyt, you're lying, GGJohn Jan 2016 #40

FYI... petronius Jan 2016 #43

LOL, GGJohn Jan 2016 #44

cool Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #47

guess someone can't alert for 24 hours Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #45

Awww HOYT - did YOU send an ALERT for THAT ??? n/t, too risky... vkkv Jan 2016 #55

You MIGHT want to either edit or delete this post, GGJohn Jan 2016 #56

yep not worth it Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #64

Exactly right. Existing laws are ineffective. onehandle Jan 2016 #74

... GGJohn Jan 2016 #75

Reading this thread it appears crim son Jan 2016 #113

Then you need to improve your reading comprehension. eom. GGJohn Jan 2016 #117

Bold? GGJohn Jan 2016 #29

Politics, John, is the art of the possible. forest444 Jan 2016 #42

Don't get me wrong, GGJohn Jan 2016 #46

and are not the big bold moves Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #48

Yup, now just watch MDA, Brady Org., MAIG, VPC, etc GGJohn Jan 2016 #49

They wont. beevul Jan 2016 #110

No doubt about it. forest444 Jan 2016 #51

yep, why did he not do this Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #54

That's what I want to know! forest444 Jan 2016 #61

Well...keep in mind Kang Colby Jan 2016 #60

Sounds like a quiltwork of standards in dire need of not just updating, but nationalization forest444 Jan 2016 #70

Not exactly. Kang Colby Jan 2016 #72

So what we have is a case of excessive latitude and runaway CLEOs. forest444 Jan 2016 #78

Thank you for the kind words. Kang Colby Jan 2016 #81

FYI... Kang Colby Jan 2016 #100

Is the laughing emoticon really necessary? UncleTomsEvilBrother Jan 2016 #50

problem is Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #52

"Is the laughing emoticon really necessary?" GGJohn Jan 2016 #53

Good question. AngryOldDem Jan 2016 #94

numbers DustyJoe Jan 2016 #62

every incident I have seen is Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #66

don't worry Skittles Jan 2016 #67

Why are you here? vkkv Jan 2016 #85

Oh look, Only 100 thousand non-sensical posts and I CAN BE RIGHT THERE with YOU!! vkkv Jan 2016 #87

Don't YOU live in Texas Skittles? Surely, you MUST relate! vkkv Jan 2016 #88

So.. no actual change, just more enforcement of existing laws. X_Digger Jan 2016 #65

if you look Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #68

Yeah, I just finished reading the WH press release doublespeak. X_Digger Jan 2016 #69

You read it wrong - it is a change._________n/t vkkv Jan 2016 #86

Feel free to actually point to the section in the above press release that is a real change. X_Digger Jan 2016 #101

Here you go! This is right up your alley:: Fox News digest vkkv Jan 2016 #120

Nope. Anyone 'in the business of' is ALREADY required to have a FFL. Try again. n/t X_Digger Jan 2016 #121

"In the business"..... Welcome to my ignore list. vkkv Jan 2016 #124

For those who refuse to put their heads in the sand (unlike dear vkkv here) X_Digger Jan 2016 #125

"Welcome to my ignore list." pablo_marmol Jan 2016 #133

Still waiting. n/t X_Digger Jan 2016 #119

I bet this works just as well as his presidential order to close gitmo. nt Javaman Jan 2016 #102

Good timing Mr President workinclasszero Jan 2016 #112

Great! Duppers Jan 2016 #114

I am so glad I am not so afraid Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #115

Oh you haven't met DU trolls yet? Some people you just gotta hide or they hijack whole threads and trillion Jan 2016 #132

I see lots of posts and people Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #139

should have been done long ago but better late than never wordpix Jan 2016 #116

So how much will this decrease gun violence by? NobodyHere Jan 2016 #118

. trillion Jan 2016 #123

Democracynow.org has a good discussion on this today on their daily show. trillion Jan 2016 #128

The dead giveaway that the "gun show loophole" is pure culture war: pablo_marmol Jan 2016 #136

Actually, this law closes the internet loophole and a whole lot of guns are being sold on the trillion Jan 2016 #137

what Internet loophole? Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #140

No end to the ignorance is there, Duckhunter? pablo_marmol Jan 2016 #143

So, you don't know anything about this law and the internet. Got it. trillion Jan 2016 #146

"culture war" on what culture? trillion Jan 2016 #138

Gun owners --- and there's a LOT of them who don't like being equated with criminals....... pablo_marmol Jan 2016 #142

There is a war on the culture of gun owners? trillion Jan 2016 #147

"I would say there is a war on kids by who's actually dying over that war though." pablo_marmol Jan 2016 #151

Can you site this "Lying" you keep accusing dems of doing? trillion Jan 2016 #154

You meant to say 'cite', of course. pablo_marmol Jan 2016 #155

Here's a great example, recently posted, of what I'm talking about. pablo_marmol Jan 2016 #156

Post removed Post removed Jan 2016 #152