Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Stricter State Gun Laws Tied To Fewer U.S. Teens With Firearms [View all]branford
(4,462 posts)164. That hipster will probably poke his eye out or stab his foot.
However, the inevitable threads discussing it on DU would be most entertaining.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
212 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Everybody has a gun and much more gun deaths or no gun deaths? Do you have to ask?
randys1
Sep 2015
#6
It wont be me, but if we were to enforce the 2nd your gun would be in a militia where it belongs
randys1
Sep 2015
#9
My possession and ownership of all of my firearms is entirely consistent
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2015
#11
Yeah, let's see a kid try that with a 1000lb Liberty safe that's bolted to two walls and the floor
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2015
#58
The huge difference is that gun owners aren't FFL's and aren't running a business,
GGJohn
Sep 2015
#103
I'm not tolerant nor open minded towards those that want to curtail our civil rights,
GGJohn
Sep 2015
#134
I was responding to post #111 by sarisataka asking if I thought the police
BarstowCowboy
Sep 2015
#129
Don't be so quick to dismiss the dangers of military style assault weapons
BarstowCowboy
Sep 2015
#10
High capacity clip technology ended with the en-bloc 8 shot Garand rifle.
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2015
#12
Anti-gunners use loaded words to obscure the fact that rifles are rarely used in crime:
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#14
Whatever. I'm for gun control, and I have a considerable knowledge of firearms.
Paladin
Sep 2015
#16
What matter the design of a gun? It's the *use* that should concern all of us.
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#17
It matters when discussing legislative proposals for real issues in the real world.
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2015
#26
You don't need much more than a quill pen to exercise your right to free speech
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#27
You lot would get a lot farther if you ditched the constant sexual references
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#31
I hunt. But you're right. The 2nd amendment is not and never has been about hunting.
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2015
#39
When word processors and bubble jet printers start killing random passers by,
BarstowCowboy
Sep 2015
#107
You want to allow only firearms that were around when the 2A was first written?
GGJohn
Sep 2015
#108
Cool, I want a cannon-equipped warship like John Hancock owned and used!
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#124
I'm going to go start a gonfundme to get my neighborhood watch a stealth bomber n/t
BarstowCowboy
Sep 2015
#130
"I don't support the private ownership of weapons." A gradualist prohibitionist, eh?
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#184
He's openly and readily admitted he wishes to ban civilian ownership of firearms.
branford
Sep 2015
#191
The explicit gun banners are outnumbered by the dissembling ones...
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#193
While you're busy using trigger words why don't you explain the mass murder utility of a bayonet.
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2015
#23
"bipod and his M16 on full auto." That is if the M16a1 would rock a full mag with out jamming. n/t
oneshooter
Sep 2015
#195
The "a1"'s were known as troop killers. Unreliable and were issued with no cleaning gear.
oneshooter
Sep 2015
#202
He doesn't have to- *you* need to explain why these things need to be banned
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#35
Since you've admitted elsewhere that you're a gun prohibitionist...
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#185
Your concerns are not borne out by statistics-rifles are rarely used as murder weapons:
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#15
If rifles are more dangerous, why do murdering maniacs overwhelmingly choose
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2015
#24
It's a cultural and emotional thing with controllers. They believe certain things to be 'wrong'...
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#28
You gonna turn in your pistols, and encourage others, to save some kids? I bet not.
Hoyt
Sep 2015
#33
Actually, I do it to help keep controllers from driving the Democratic Party over a cliff
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#44
If you think 'watch your mouth' carries any weight on the internet, go ahead and block me now.
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2015
#49
And you can not debate with someone who has no idea what he is talking about.
oneshooter
Sep 2015
#183
Before I go there, can you tell me if the mounted bayonet catergory is covered?
BarstowCowboy
Sep 2015
#154
Gun fanciers do not care. Teen deaths, spousal abuse and intimidation with gunz, mass shootings, etc
Hoyt
Sep 2015
#32
people more offended about terms like "gun fancier" than by senseless gun slaughter
Skittles
Sep 2015
#52
Thats the reason I stopped posting in the RKBA forum. I can't deal with the controllers nonsense.
darkangel218
Sep 2015
#170
From the stocks they already have and from smugglers , just like the drugs brought here.
darkangel218
Sep 2015
#169
And how is that going to help someone who is not phisicaly strong to protect themselves??
darkangel218
Sep 2015
#78
Complaints about "gun culture" are often little more than a elitist euphemism
branford
Sep 2015
#119
I appreciate the complement and civility, and respect your candor about your positions.
branford
Sep 2015
#155