Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Stricter State Gun Laws Tied To Fewer U.S. Teens With Firearms [View all]BarstowCowboy
(171 posts)130. I'm going to go start a gonfundme to get my neighborhood watch a stealth bomber n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
212 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Everybody has a gun and much more gun deaths or no gun deaths? Do you have to ask?
randys1
Sep 2015
#6
It wont be me, but if we were to enforce the 2nd your gun would be in a militia where it belongs
randys1
Sep 2015
#9
My possession and ownership of all of my firearms is entirely consistent
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2015
#11
Yeah, let's see a kid try that with a 1000lb Liberty safe that's bolted to two walls and the floor
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2015
#58
The huge difference is that gun owners aren't FFL's and aren't running a business,
GGJohn
Sep 2015
#103
I'm not tolerant nor open minded towards those that want to curtail our civil rights,
GGJohn
Sep 2015
#134
I was responding to post #111 by sarisataka asking if I thought the police
BarstowCowboy
Sep 2015
#129
Don't be so quick to dismiss the dangers of military style assault weapons
BarstowCowboy
Sep 2015
#10
High capacity clip technology ended with the en-bloc 8 shot Garand rifle.
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2015
#12
Anti-gunners use loaded words to obscure the fact that rifles are rarely used in crime:
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#14
Whatever. I'm for gun control, and I have a considerable knowledge of firearms.
Paladin
Sep 2015
#16
What matter the design of a gun? It's the *use* that should concern all of us.
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#17
It matters when discussing legislative proposals for real issues in the real world.
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2015
#26
You don't need much more than a quill pen to exercise your right to free speech
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#27
You lot would get a lot farther if you ditched the constant sexual references
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#31
I hunt. But you're right. The 2nd amendment is not and never has been about hunting.
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2015
#39
When word processors and bubble jet printers start killing random passers by,
BarstowCowboy
Sep 2015
#107
You want to allow only firearms that were around when the 2A was first written?
GGJohn
Sep 2015
#108
Cool, I want a cannon-equipped warship like John Hancock owned and used!
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#124
I'm going to go start a gonfundme to get my neighborhood watch a stealth bomber n/t
BarstowCowboy
Sep 2015
#130
"I don't support the private ownership of weapons." A gradualist prohibitionist, eh?
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#184
He's openly and readily admitted he wishes to ban civilian ownership of firearms.
branford
Sep 2015
#191
The explicit gun banners are outnumbered by the dissembling ones...
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#193
While you're busy using trigger words why don't you explain the mass murder utility of a bayonet.
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2015
#23
"bipod and his M16 on full auto." That is if the M16a1 would rock a full mag with out jamming. n/t
oneshooter
Sep 2015
#195
The "a1"'s were known as troop killers. Unreliable and were issued with no cleaning gear.
oneshooter
Sep 2015
#202
He doesn't have to- *you* need to explain why these things need to be banned
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#35
Since you've admitted elsewhere that you're a gun prohibitionist...
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#185
Your concerns are not borne out by statistics-rifles are rarely used as murder weapons:
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#15
If rifles are more dangerous, why do murdering maniacs overwhelmingly choose
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2015
#24
It's a cultural and emotional thing with controllers. They believe certain things to be 'wrong'...
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#28
You gonna turn in your pistols, and encourage others, to save some kids? I bet not.
Hoyt
Sep 2015
#33
Actually, I do it to help keep controllers from driving the Democratic Party over a cliff
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#44
If you think 'watch your mouth' carries any weight on the internet, go ahead and block me now.
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2015
#49
And you can not debate with someone who has no idea what he is talking about.
oneshooter
Sep 2015
#183
Before I go there, can you tell me if the mounted bayonet catergory is covered?
BarstowCowboy
Sep 2015
#154
Gun fanciers do not care. Teen deaths, spousal abuse and intimidation with gunz, mass shootings, etc
Hoyt
Sep 2015
#32
people more offended about terms like "gun fancier" than by senseless gun slaughter
Skittles
Sep 2015
#52
Thats the reason I stopped posting in the RKBA forum. I can't deal with the controllers nonsense.
darkangel218
Sep 2015
#170
From the stocks they already have and from smugglers , just like the drugs brought here.
darkangel218
Sep 2015
#169
And how is that going to help someone who is not phisicaly strong to protect themselves??
darkangel218
Sep 2015
#78
Complaints about "gun culture" are often little more than a elitist euphemism
branford
Sep 2015
#119
I appreciate the complement and civility, and respect your candor about your positions.
branford
Sep 2015
#155