Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Behind the Aegis

(53,956 posts)

25. OK...Gotcha!

Reply to Electric Monk (Reply #24)

Thu May 10, 2012, 12:59 AM

May 2012

I thought you were claiming I was for child porn and I re-read both my examples, and for the life of me, couldn't understand how anyone could reach that conclusion. What I was commenting on was the "cache" issue and the "websites claiming the models are of legal age but aren't" issue and how they could be real problems to unsuspecting people.

On edit: I misread "they" as "you" in your first reply to me. That's what I get for trying to read multiple posts. My apologies.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Viewing Child Porn on the Web 'Legal' in New York State, Appeals Court Finds [View all] redqueen May 2012 OP

This strikes me as a law-hasn't-caught-up-with-technology situation. Skinner May 2012 #1

That's the tricky and scary part, too: arcane1 May 2012 #2

Yes, the last paragraph in the excerpt spells that out. redqueen May 2012 #3

Tech answers: 2ndAmForComputers May 2012 #15

... redqueen May 2012 #17

So, guilty for the stored folder.... if it was not an automatic cache folder. boppers May 2012 #28

So it's not just the title that was poorly written. redqueen May 2012 #29

Very much so. boppers May 2012 #31

He's from marist and O"Reillly is from marist wilt the stilt May 2012 #4

No. No, we can't. eggplant May 2012 #5

Sounds to me like they said you are not responsible for what's in your cache. bemildred May 2012 #6

that's my understanding as well Mosby May 2012 #7

Which actually makes sense. Behind the Aegis May 2012 #8

It does indeed... regnaD kciN May 2012 #9

Yup! The "Helen Lovejoys" of the world will be out in force. Behind the Aegis May 2012 #10

Something tells me there are things you think should NOT be allowed. Sarcasticus May 2012 #12

What? Behind the Aegis May 2012 #16

What? No. How? Sarcasticus May 2012 #18

What the hell are you talking about? Behind the Aegis May 2012 #19

Near as I can tell, they are arguing, badly, for kiddie porn (all of it) to be totally legal. Electric Monk May 2012 #20

How the fuck did you arrive at the erroneous conclusion?! Behind the Aegis May 2012 #21

From reading Sarcasticus's posts, #12 &#18. nt Electric Monk May 2012 #22

Like his posts, your's makes no goddamned sense. Behind the Aegis May 2012 #23

Reading comprehension fail. I'm saying that's what Sarcasticus was arguing for, badly. Electric Monk May 2012 #24

OK...Gotcha! Behind the Aegis May 2012 #25

You ARE wrong! Sarcasticus May 2012 #26

Now how could I jump to the conclusion your posts had something to do with child porn, in a thread Electric Monk May 2012 #30

Thanks. bemildred May 2012 #11

Here is the Actual Opinion happyslug May 2012 #13

what about cops, FBI, lawyers, judges who 'view' child porn Swagman May 2012 #14

Having coke in an evidence locker is not possession. boppers May 2012 #27