Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: U.S. loses meat labeling case; trade war looms [View all]Response to cascadiance (Reply #40)
nenagh This message was self-deleted by its author.
Edit history
Cannot view edit history for self-deleted messages.
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Right, you are not allowed to know what you eat because that discriminates against the
bemildred
May 2015
#1
Perfect example of trade agreements being used as leverage to attack law and regulation.
pa28
May 2015
#3
Canada has published a hit list of potential U.S. targets, including wine, chocolate, ketchup and ce
bananas
May 2015
#57
Using the now upheld by tribunal legitimate complaints of Canada and Mexico meat processors about American point of
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#7
Canada will now be able to market it's own labels, like Alberta grain fed Prime beef.....if you can
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#29
It's illogical to point out nearly identical rules and tribunals are in the leaked parts of the TPP?
jeff47
May 2015
#31
It would be nice to know if the fish comes from a near-collapsed fishery too n/t
arcane1
May 2015
#27
Tilapia, no? A bottom feeder catfish type, farmed in Asia w/antibiotics thrown in. Yum.
appalachiablue
May 2015
#66
That must be why all the bayous and drainage ditches are infested with tilapia...
Sunlei
May 2015
#73
My fear is the country of origin labels for fruit/veggies will come under fire next
peacebird
May 2015
#46
I want to be able to discriminate based upon where my meat was born, raised, slaughtered, processed,
Ed Suspicious
May 2015
#12
I have stopped eating fish because it's impossible to track their origins. Will do the same if meat
Lodestar
May 2015
#42
Our food production is regulated under FDA and USDA rules. These organizations are at least
Ed Suspicious
May 2015
#24
I don't necessarily. Country of origin labels allow me to decide. Do you have a problem
Ed Suspicious
May 2015
#37
Here we go. Now we're not allowed to know where the meat we are eating came from?
onecaliberal
May 2015
#33
yup. There is a guy upthread who seems to hold a very strong opinion that this is the way it should
Ed Suspicious
May 2015
#38
A big issue with this decision is U.S. and Canada policy on mad cow "diets" of cattle...
cascadiance
May 2015
#40
it is the feed problem. That 2004 article was very well written. It even touched on chronic wasting
Sunlei
May 2015
#74
The only point to labeling is to highlight, which is another means to discourage purchase.
randome
May 2015
#47
True enough; we do indeed need more oversight, but I'd still prefer to be the decision maker
Lodestar
May 2015
#49
The point of MAD Trade Agreements is to enable corporations to make more profit
appalachiablue
May 2015
#68
Not to discourage purchase. If Italy puts out a premium beef product, they should be
Ed Suspicious
May 2015
#59
So far as I know, nothing prevents a company from calling attention to their own products.
randome
May 2015
#62
Folks should maybe try a Canadian news source for THEIR perspective on this, because there
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#80
If a country does not meet our safety standards -applied uniformly to all signatories-
randome
May 2015
#65
Part of the problem, if we are going to create these huge global trade sectors, is that there are
Lodestar
May 2015
#50