Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: SOME DOCTORS WON'T SEE PATIENTS WITH ANTI-VACCINE VIEWS [View all]christx30
(6,241 posts)79. The jury doesn't care if the posts are
accurate or not. It's does it violate the TOS? Personal attacks are the majority of the posts I've juried.
If someone posted something that said climate change is exclusively caused by Santa Claus feeding his elves, that post would survive. If someone called the poster an idiot, THAT post would be hidden.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
send them into the arms of quacks? maybe they can just start the pray away the sickness thing
msongs
Jan 2015
#2
Selectively ignoring inconvenient science is an unsustainable approach.
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2015
#37
Good. Babies won't be infected with measles or whooping cough when they visit that doctor's office.
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#10
Page 30: "...JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, with whom JUSTICE GINSBERG joins, dissenting."
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2015
#21
No, Kaiser Permante Chairman Bernard Tyson via CNBC. Watch the video here.
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2015
#35
Nuance, please. See IACC Transcript: "They are two different things and we call it all autism."
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2015
#60
That is not settled science no matter how many times you repeat yourself. (nt)
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2015
#71
Find me a single direct link to Natural News. ANS: DOES NOT EXIST. I don't read the site ever.
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2015
#52
AOA posts wouldn't survive the DU jury system if what you claim is true, but it's not. Sorry. (nt)
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2015
#55
It's science, not woo. Otherwise it would be hidden by the discerning juries on DU. (nt)
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2015
#72
It's hard to justify hiding unpopular material when it's clearly fact based science, and DU has not.
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2015
#78
In my experience on this topic, posts with scientific citations stay & op-eds are instantly canned.
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2015
#81
That's a malicious mischaracterization. I can count my total hidden posts on one hand. (nt)
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2015
#88
You want a food fight; I'm not interested. Get up to speed or don't, your prerogative.
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2015
#54
You're talking about people who believe their doctor wants to poison their child
jeff47
Jan 2015
#41
If they stopped seeing every patient who wouldn't follow their advice, they would go bankrupt.
livetohike
Jan 2015
#28
I'm all for taunting your T-cells with mashed bacteria husks, but they seem madder at
MisterP
Jan 2015
#67
Substantive pushback comment... "even pro-vaccine parents have a threshold of compliance."
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2015
#73