Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
33. it's not something that can be bought
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 07:46 AM
Jul 2012

The Europeans have generations of disciplined practice; dressage training is the foundation of all their riding and they understand that.

American 1%ers keep trying to shortcut by trying to buy their way into it. Unfortunately, they are the ones that continue to make certain the the US will never do well, by forcing out any serious competition at home, leaving opportunities only to those who are less gifted at riding and training than at being sycophants.

Romney and Ebeling are perfect examples. Ebeling is basically in the US because he couldn't cut it back at home in Germany. His former wife, Lisa Wilcox, is an American who preferred to stay in Germany to get the best training available. He preferred to stay in the US where he had a better chance of getting 1%ers to finance him. (Interestingly, she made the US team before he did. Although she didn't have a great showing, she also was set back because the major owner of the horse she was riding did not want him to go to the Olympics. He was an active, famous breeding stallion and the owner only reluctantly gave him a break from his other job, which left him less time to prepare and in less than peak condition for competition.)

That Ebeling settled a fraud suit out of court for allegedly drugging one of Romney's horses (Super Hit), a suit from which Ann Romney was dropped, just adds to the evidence that our teams continue to be sub-par, relying on drugging and fraud instead of generations of long term planning and hard work coupled with honest respect and love for the practice of dressage and the horses themselves.

There was a point decades ago when we could have built a good foundation for future dressage teams in this country. Those days are long gone.

You forgot Kalidurga Jul 2012 #1
+1 DUly noted! stlsaxman Jul 2012 #7
The doping case for the rMOney's is a far more effective attack than Ann's support of an Olympic riderinthestorm Jul 2012 #14
Also, Annie's not riding this hoss. It's like rich people with show dogs, they hire one of MADem Jul 2012 #22
+1. you nailed it. nt magical thyme Jul 2012 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author cthulu2016 Jul 2012 #2
Anne Boleyn did not, to my knowledge, have a "cake" moment KamaAina Jul 2012 #3
I was going to comment but you beat me to it. GoneOffShore Jul 2012 #5
It is said... cthulu2016 Jul 2012 #6
Unless the executioner told her that her beheading would be a piece of cake... MADem Jul 2012 #23
I don't think it will matter a whole lot treestar Jul 2012 #4
Corrected- thanks everyone! stlsaxman Jul 2012 #8
Photos, lots of photos... nenagh Jul 2012 #9
NBC Olympic coverage will paint it warm and fuzzy MS therapy for Mrs. Romney.... tokenlib Jul 2012 #10
As someone with Multiple Sclerosis........... rockinrobyn Jul 2012 #11
She is not riding this horse jberryhill Jul 2012 #12
She does ride though, daily. Supporting the sport of dressage and an Olympic pair is giving back riderinthestorm Jul 2012 #13
Giving back? jberryhill Jul 2012 #16
That's a small fraction of what it costs to own, train and compete an international level horse. riderinthestorm Jul 2012 #19
It would seem, though, that "we the people" are unwittingly and unwillingly sponsoring these horses- MADem Jul 2012 #21
agreed on all points except two magical thyme Jul 2012 #26
Her horse BUSINESS took the deductions that gave them the refund. riderinthestorm Jul 2012 #28
I am focusing on Ann and Mitt's gaming of the tax code--no "seem to" about it. MADem Jul 2012 #31
Its a business and unless you want ALL animal business to operate under a different tax code riderinthestorm Jul 2012 #32
"It's one thing to use a horse as a beast of burden, for the purposes of getting from point A to Poi magical thyme Jul 2012 #36
No, I don't "seem to think" that at all. I know if horses had their druthers and a ready supply of MADem Jul 2012 #38
your tone, word choice, what you respond to and what you choose to ignore says it all magical thyme Jul 2012 #40
Just stop doing that. Stop. Don't tell me about my "tone" when your read of it is all wrong. MADem Jul 2012 #41
I do not care whether you appreciate dressage or not,nor am I trying to bend you to my will magical thyme Jul 2012 #42
As a professional writer, you'd probably recognize "huffy" and "shirty" too. MADem Jul 2012 #43
Actually.. rockinrobyn Jul 2012 #44
I'll save my pity for the lives her husband has destroyed Marrah_G Jul 2012 #35
Ooooooo rockinrobyn Jul 2012 #45
If any of those people lived off destroying other people's lives, I would feel the same way. Marrah_G Jul 2012 #47
Rafalca won't come close to winning so the point is moot. And don't we support American athletes? riderinthestorm Jul 2012 #15
Who's the rider? aint_no_life_nowhere Jul 2012 #17
thank you. stlsaxman Jul 2012 #18
Jan Ebeling. There have been many slams about "Ann's horse" and this sport. riderinthestorm Jul 2012 #20
Me neither. And ain't it special to take bows as the sponsor when taxpayers are paying a MADem Jul 2012 #25
No one is slamming the horse--we're slamming an obscenely rich woman for nickle-and-diming the MADem Jul 2012 #24
See post #28. I'm not going to answer the same points over and over. nt riderinthestorm Jul 2012 #29
Huh? USA has one bronze in this event - in 1932 malaise Jul 2012 #30
it's not something that can be bought magical thyme Jul 2012 #33
Nice informative post malaise Jul 2012 #34
none of the above. I think the Romney's hope it will be seen favorably or at least not being CTyankee Jul 2012 #37
Why are you referring to this as "Her" Olympic bid? GoCubsGo Jul 2012 #39
How are the Romney's not the very elitists they tried to paint Kerry as in 2004? Initech Jul 2012 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Implications Of An Ann Ro...»Reply #33