Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Stealing of the 2000 Presidential Election: Ch 1, Part 2 – The 36-Day Battle to Recount the Vote [View all]joycejnr
(326 posts)45. A nifty little chart...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Stealing of the 2000 Presidential Election: Ch 1, Part 2 – The 36-Day Battle to Recount the Vote [View all]
Time for change
Jun 2012
OP
jsut started to read, but I remember going to sleep with Gore as pres, then waking up the next
robinlynne
Jun 2012
#2
Yes, they did call it for Gore first, and then they called it for Bush, and then they called it
Time for change
Jun 2012
#7
When Obama won, I was afraid to go to sleep. They switch presidents while you sleep.
robinlynne
Jun 2012
#27
the Party actively defends Registrars who dabble with Diebold, and I do mean literally.
robinlynne
Jun 2012
#28
Yes, the influence of money in politics and the restrictive voting laws are a terrible thing
Time for change
Jun 2012
#17
Thanks -- I will be covering the 2004 exit poll discrepancies from the official vote count
Time for change
Jun 2012
#36
Vanity Fair's article has a description of what went on before the SCOTUS made their decision.
Gregorian
Jun 2012
#15
It sounds like you're talking about the automatic machine recount, right?
Time for change
Jun 2012
#22
I'm pretty sure you're referring to the 680 technically illegal overseas ballots
Time for change
Jun 2012
#29