Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

sheshe2

(83,793 posts)
Wed Feb 8, 2017, 09:38 PM Feb 2017

Rule Used to Silence Warren Was Created to Protect Delicate Feelings of Senates Foremost Lynching A [View all]

Rule Used to Silence Warren Was Created to Protect Delicate Feelings of Senate’s Foremost Lynching Advocate


An incident in the 1850s inspired consideration about adopting a rule to curb such excesses, but the Senate finally did so only after an ugly episode during a debate in 1902. South Carolina's "Pitchfork Ben" Tillman accused his South Carolina colleague, John McLaurin, of selling his vote for federal patronage. McLaurin called Tillman a malicious liar. Tillman lunged at him, striking him above the left eye. McLaurin hit Tillman back with an upper-cut to the nose. They were separated by other senators, and the brawl caused consternation throughout political Washington. Senator George Hoar of Massachusetts seized the occasion to propose a rule he long had had in mind: "No senator in debate shall, directly or indirectly or by any form of words impute to another senator or to other senators any conduct or motive unworthy or unbecoming a senator." Once adopted, senators had the means of instantly quieting raucous or abusive debates.



The rule was created, in other words, to protect senators like Ben Tillman from hearing mean things that would make them so mad they had to punch someone. And Ben Tillman, as it happens, is perhaps the most notorious proponent of racial terrorism in the history of the United States. Here are just a few of the things Tillman said during his horrific political career:

"[We] agreed on on the policy of terrorizing the Negroes at the first opportunity by letting them provoke trouble and then having the whites demonstrate their superiority by killing as many of them as was justifiable." (Tillman boasted during the same speech that his pistol had been used to execute seven black men in 1876. Source.)
•"Lynch law is all we have left." (Source.)
"The action of President Roosevelt in entertaining that nigger will necessitate our killing a thousand niggers in the South before they learn their place again." (In reference to Booker T. Washington's visit to the White House. Source.)
"We of the South have never recognized the right of the Negro to govern white men, and we never will. We have never believed him to be the equal of the white man, and we will not submit to his gratifying his lust on our wives and daughters without lynching him. I would to God the last one of them was in Africa and that none of them had ever been brought to our shores." (That one was on the floor of the Senate itself. Source.)


Indeed, is it not obvious that we must protect the integrity of Rule 19 to ensure that the Senate continues to be a safe space for Ben Tillman's successors?
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/02/08/elizabeth_warren_rule_19_and_white_supremacist_ben_tillman.html


_______________________________________

This. THIS is the arcane law Mitch dredged up to silence Warren. THIS! Anyone feel sick now. I do.
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I just don't understand how this rule applies to this situation since the Senator in question is the TrekLuver Feb 2017 #1
You are being logical. There is nothing logical about this. Amaryllis Feb 2017 #18
I was surprised that no Dem Senators raised this point--it was also my first thought. flor-de-jasmim Feb 2017 #26
Then how apropos that it was used this time ... dchill Feb 2017 #2
There's a whole lot of dog-whistles going off right now! yallerdawg Feb 2017 #3
Seems appropriate. Squinch Feb 2017 #4
Snowflakes then. Snowflakes now. GoCubsGo Feb 2017 #5
If pro is the opposite of con, what's the opposite of progress? Initech Feb 2017 #6
Why do White racists always allude to Black men banging White Blue_true Feb 2017 #7
Well. sheshe2 Feb 2017 #8
psycho-sexual heaven05 Feb 2017 #24
They're afraid the child will become the next Barack Obama crazycatlady Feb 2017 #9
Senators up for confirmation MUST be criticized in the Senate. Law trumps Senate rules. So Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2017 #10
Link is wrong thesquanderer Feb 2017 #11
Fixed. sheshe2 Feb 2017 #14
Is the link wrong? I get an EPA article. Richard D Feb 2017 #12
Correct link Richard D Feb 2017 #13
Fixed sheshe2 Feb 2017 #15
Wow. Thx, Slate - Glad someone dug into this arcanity. Beartracks Feb 2017 #16
"Selling his vote for federal patronage." raging moderate Feb 2017 #17
Ironically enough, he's also responsible for the first campaign finance law Calista241 Feb 2017 #19
K&R betsuni Feb 2017 #20
Thanks for posting this. Could be useful during a Warren campaign. brush Feb 2017 #21
Speaking of Tillman, Clemson and Winthrop Univ. both have a Tillman Hall. raccoon Feb 2017 #22
yep and not surprised heaven05 Feb 2017 #23
Yes. sheshe2 Feb 2017 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rule Used to Silence Warr...