Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Jimbo101

(776 posts)
Wed Jan 11, 2017, 02:21 PM Jan 2017

REINS Act - The Most Dangerous Bill You've Never Heard of Just Passed the House [View all]

http://www.truth-out.org/buzzflash/commentary/the-most-dangerous-bill-you-ve-never-heard-of-just-passed-the-house

Last, week, under the cover of a media bliss-out except among Koch funded right-wing channels, the House of Representatives passed a bill which would effectively repeal future standard setting under every important environmental, public health, consumer protection, labor standards, occupational safety and civil rights law on the books.

The bill, called the REINS Act, requires that any future major regulation adopted by an Executive Agency—say a new toxic chemical standard required by the recently enacted Chemical Safety Act, or a new consumer protection rule about some innovative but untested kind of food additive—must be approved by a specific resolution in each House of Congress within 70 days to take effect.

As one example, the REINS Act would totally neuter the new Chemical Safety Act, just passed by the Republican Congress last year. The act requires U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to review and set standards for 10 widely abused chemicals in the next six months alone. The act passed only because in exchange, states gave up much of their power to protect their citizens from toxic chemicals; without that incentive, the Tea Party will certainly act to prevent EPA from restricting the use of these chemicals. But the states only agreed to give up in exchange for the promise that EPA would act. But the REINS act neuters this promise. Even if the House Republican caucus was willing in theory to consider such rules, there is simply no way Congress could add 10-40 new pieces of legislation to its work load in the chemical safety area alone. In fact, the House also just passed legislation to allow it to REPEAL all of President Obama's regulatory acts in the last eight months of his term in office with one vote. Why? Because House members said there was not time for individual votes on each rule—exactly the requirement they just established for new rules.

Worse, Congress totally lacks the technical competence to review these kinds of complex rules. Do we really want members of Congress deciding whether a chemical can safely be used in food packaging? Or the proper procedures for approving new drugs as safe and effective? Or setting the allowable safety standard for heavy metals in drinking water?
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Good God. n/t MBS Jan 2017 #1
Do you find it as odd as I do that Doreen Jan 2017 #2
Thinning The Herd....n t global1 Jan 2017 #3
Yes, thinning to make way for their family. Jacob Boehme Jan 2017 #13
Yes, today's Republicans are a murderous party. GliderGuider Jan 2017 #9
Are they trying to kill us? I think so. SammyWinstonJack Jan 2017 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author Pacifist Patriot Jan 2017 #18
Republicans must be Westworld's androids. Girard442 Jan 2017 #4
In their gated enclaves, all will be safe. Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2017 #6
they will be safe elmac Jan 2017 #10
Don't they always? Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2017 #26
Wow Achilleaze Jan 2017 #5
but hillary had (but actually didnt) had an email in the wrong place Ohioblue22 Jan 2017 #7
knr cry baby Jan 2017 #8
oh yay...now we can have a Love Canal in every neighborhood. lovely. nt Javaman Jan 2017 #11
K & R Scurrilous Jan 2017 #12
Will it pass the Senate? Liberalynn Jan 2017 #14
This should pretty easy to Filibuster in the Senate. Waaay too extreme Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2017 #20
One article that I have read since did say Dems would most likely Liberalynn Jan 2017 #25
this goes beyond greed Locrian Jan 2017 #15
The Rains of Castamere Act? tclambert Jan 2017 #17
I would think all of this would be an unconstitutional power grab by Congress stopwastingmymoney Jan 2017 #19
The question is where does the line between enforcement end and reinvention begin? Amishman Jan 2017 #24
Delaying by 70 days is easy. Sounds like a reasonable amount of time, but lindysalsagal Jan 2017 #21
well rtracey Jan 2017 #22
How many Democrats voted for it? hibbing Jan 2017 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»REINS Act - The Most Dang...