Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Teddy Roosevelt was right. [View all]TrollBuster9090
(5,954 posts)17. Teddy was also a self-proclaimed progressive.
Remember, prior to the Southern Strategy of 1968 the Republican party was the party of rational thought and good governance, and the Democratic party was the home of demagoguery and the KKK. Lincoln was a liberal for his time, and so were the Founding Fathers.
Teddy Roosevelt was a champion of workers rights, the 40 hour work week etc., and tried to break up the big trusts that were strangling the country during the Gilded Age. He eventually left the GOP and formed the Progressive Party which was, essentially, dedicated to all the things the Democratic Party of today claims to be dedicated to.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That's a new one to me. I have never heard anything about taxation being a cause.
ieoeja
Jun 2012
#44
Yep. From 1860 to 1960 the GOP was the liberal/progressive party. It was all downhill after that.
TrollBuster9090
Jun 2012
#22
Unfortunately, the people who could pass such a law are on the corporate payroll.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2012
#3
Corporations giving politicians money is simple theft. That money belongs to the shareholders.
SDjack
Jun 2012
#6
Or at the very least, shareholders should be able to VOTE on whether their company gives money to
TrollBuster9090
Jun 2012
#27
You don't think the shareholders benefit from the political influence gained? nt
NCTraveler
Jun 2012
#55
he would not be acceptable to the tea party, can't be called a republican any more.
hollysmom
Jun 2012
#12
The Supreme Court today counter their own ruling from last year in Citizens United.
underpants
Jun 2012
#38