Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)iLawyer: What Happens When Computers Replace Attorneys? [View all]
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/06/ilawyer-what-happens-when-computers-replace-attorneys/258688/In the end, after you've stripped away their six-figure degrees, their state bar memberships, and their proclivity for capitalizing Odd Words, lawyers are just another breed of knowledge worker. They're paid to research, analyze, write, and argue -- not unlike an academic, a journalist, or an accountant. So when software comes along that's smarter or more efficient at those tasks than a human with a JD, it spells trouble.
That's one of the issues the Wall Street Journal raised yesterday in an article on the ways computer algorithms are slowly replacing human eyes when it comes to handling certain pieces of large, high-stakes litigation. It focuses on a topic that is near and dear to the legal industry (and pretty much nobody else) known as discovery, which is the process where attorneys sort through troves of documents to find pieces of evidence that might be related to a lawsuit. While it might seem like a niche topic, what's going on in the field has big implications for people who earn their living dealing with information.
The discovery process is all about cognition, the ability of people to look at endless bails of info and separate the wheat from the chaff. For many years, it was also extremely profitable for law firms, which billed hundreds of dollars an hour for associates to glance at thousands upon thousands (if not millions) of documents, and note whether they might have some passing relevance to the case at hand. Those days are pretty much dead, gone thanks to cost-conscious clients and legal temp agencies which rent out attorneys for as little as $25-an-hour to do the grunt work. Some firms are still struggling to replace the profits they've lost as a result.
And now comes the rise of the machines -- or, more precisely, the search engines. For a while now, attorneys have employed manual keyword searches to sort through the gigabytes of information involved in these case. But as the journal reports, more firms are beginning to use a technology known as "predictive coding," which essentially automates the process at one-tenth the cost. Recently, a magistrate judge in a major Virginia employment discrimination suit ruled that the defense could use predictive coding to sort through their own data, despite objections by the plaintiffs who worried it might not pick up all the relevant documents (Probably left unspoken here: plaintiffs in lawsuits also like to drive up the costs for defendants, in the hopes that it will encourage them to settle).
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
30 replies, 3437 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
30 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Please touch the screen to begin. Are you innocent or guilty? Do you prefer execution or jail?"
HopeHoops
Jun 2012
#1
Jordan Weissmann is wrong. This is a sales pitch for the latest, super-duper software
AnotherMcIntosh
Jun 2012
#2
Hey, look at all the jobs that are being created! This is driving unemployment down and wages up!
Zalatix
Jun 2012
#3
Like the article said, the doc review process is already the low end of the practice of law
stevenleser
Jun 2012
#4
Lawyers are just another group living in denial about technology and this economy.
former9thward
Jun 2012
#9
We were talking about technology in the legal profession, not your coveted plastic utensil industry
Sen. Walter Sobchak
Jun 2012
#16
Do you actually read and comprehend before you spit out a pithy reply?
Sen. Walter Sobchak
Jun 2012
#18
The first time legal research was outsourced to India meant this was an inevitability imho
riderinthestorm
Jun 2012
#20
Well, gee as someone who is planning on law school, this is slightly troubling.
white_wolf
Jun 2012
#23
Why not go with the training in Old School methodolgy you plan on pursuing...
GReedDiamond
Jun 2012
#25
I'm actually pretty good with computers already, so learning about these wouldn't be too hard.
white_wolf
Jun 2012
#27
You'll still need the right person in the courtroom at the right time, though.
knitter4democracy
Jun 2012
#29