Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Bowing To The CIA, The National Archives Won't Release 1,100 Secret Assassination Documents In 2013 [View all]
Last edited Sat Jun 16, 2012, 07:27 PM - Edit history (2)
Bowing to the CIA, the National Archives says it won't release 1,100 secret assassination documents in 2013Jim Garrison (Played By Kevin Costner): All these documents are yours. The people's property, you pay for it! But because the government considers you children who might be too disturbed or distressed to face this reality, or because you might possibly lynch those involved, you cannot see these documents for another seventy-five years. I'm in my early forties, so I'll have shuffled off this mortal coil by then, but I'm already telling my eight-year-old son to keep himself physically fit, so that one glorious September morning, in the year 2038, he can walk into the National Archives, and find out what the CIA and the FBI knew! They might even push it back then, hell it may become a generational affair, with questions passed down from father to son, mother to daughter, but someday, somewhere, somebody will find out the damn truth.
Link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0102138/quotes
****************************************************************
National Archives: No new JFK docs
Bowing to the CIA, the National Archives says it won't release 1,100 secret assassination documents in 2013
BY JEFFERSON MORLEY - Salon
THURSDAY, JUN 14, 2012 03:00 PM PDT
President and Mrs. Kennedy ride through Dallas moments before
Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963. (Credit: Reuters)
<snip>
Acquiescing to CIA demands for secrecy, the National Archives announced Wednesday that it will not release 1,171 top-secret Agency documents related to the assassination of President Kennedy in time for the 5oth anniversary of JFKs death in November 2013.
Is the government holding back crucial JFK documents, asked Russ Baker in a WhoWhatWhy piece that Salon published last month. The answer, unfortunately, is yes. In a letter released this week, Gary Stern, general counsel for the National Archives and Record Administration, said the Archives would not release the records as part of the Obama administrations ongoing declassification campaign. Stern cited CIA claims that substantial logistical requirements prevented their disclosure next year.
This is a deeply disappointing decision that deprives everyone of a fuller understanding of the JFK assassination, said Larry Sabato, a political scientist at the University of Virginia, who is writing a book about the impact of JFKs assassination on American politics. The 50th anniversary of that terrible event is the perfect opportunity to shed more light on the violent removal of a president. This adds to the widely held public suspicion that the government may still be hiding some key facts about President Kennedys murder.
The records, requested by the nonprofit Assassination Archives and Research Center (AARC), will remain secret until at least 2017, when the 1992 JFK Records Act mandates public release of all assassination files in the governments possession. (Full disclosure: AARC president Jim Lesar is my attorney in a Freedom of Information lawsuit seeking JFK records from the CIA.)
Among those seeking expedited disclosure were Notre Dame Law School professor G. Robert Blakey, who served as chief counsel for Congress JFK investigation in the late 1970s. In an email he accused the NARA of using bureaucratic jargon to obfuscate its failure to vindicate the public interest in transparency, a goal touted no less than by the Obama administration.
It beggars the imagination to assert that documents (or portions thereof) can only be released in 2017, but not 2013, said independent scholar Max Holland in an email. I can understand a 100-year argument, in order to protect the identity of confidential sources (say a spy in Castros Politburo who said he didnt do it); a 100-year rule would protect him or her. But 54 years versus 50? Doesnt make sense While it is true that JFK assassination is the most declassified event in U.S. history, in some respects NARA has done a poor job of carrying out the letter, spirit and intent of the JFK Act.
<snip>
More: http://www.salon.com/2012/06/14/national_archives_no_new_jfk_docs/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
60 replies, 14206 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (61)
ReplyReply to this post
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bowing To The CIA, The National Archives Won't Release 1,100 Secret Assassination Documents In 2013 [View all]
WillyT
Jun 2012
OP
Right-wing extremists, similar to the ones now a days, along with corporate backing has
demosincebirth
Jun 2012
#14
Or on a certain political family dynasty whose favorite son is still waiting . . .
markpkessinger
Jun 2012
#33
I had not heard this story. Positively chilling. Much goes on today that we know nothing about.
northoftheborder
Jun 2012
#35
Bush's statement that he doesn't remember where he was on Nov.22, 1963 . .
markpkessinger
Jun 2012
#31
Considered in the context of the longer political history, a remarkable pattern emerges . . .
markpkessinger
Jun 2012
#34
Yes...it's awful... thanks for reminding us. We will all be dead...and hopefully some GrandKid
KoKo
Jun 2012
#9
I think they are waiting for all of us to die off. Then they will feel safe...
CTyankee
Jun 2012
#16
What was it that poppy bush said about us knowing what they have done?
SammyWinstonJack
Jun 2012
#57
The people who killed JFK are the very ones preventing the release of these documents.
Lint Head
Jun 2012
#19
La la la! Nothing to see here! Time to move on. What's on TV? What did the Kardashians do? n/t
RufusTFirefly
Jun 2012
#32
Oswald did it. Alone. I know it is not as interesting as made up stuff, but it is the truth. n-t
Logical
Jun 2012
#42
I 100% agree with you. Unless the papers make the CIA look bad in some other area. Like maybe....
Logical
Jun 2012
#48
People on every side of this issue are so fond of making their assertions as though they are fact.
malthaussen
Jun 2012
#45
Well, that means nothing. As I assume you know. If I can find 50 FBI agents who think he did it...
Logical
Jun 2012
#47
wow, you just solved the kennedy assassination and the ufo controversy in one post....utterly amazing
spanone
Jun 2012
#51
If the secret documents were consistent with the official report, they wouldn't be secret. nt
lumberjack_jeff
Jun 2012
#49