Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 07:34 PM Jun 2012

Bowing To The CIA, The National Archives Won't Release 1,100 Secret Assassination Documents In 2013 [View all]

Last edited Sat Jun 16, 2012, 07:27 PM - Edit history (2)

Bowing to the CIA, the National Archives says it won't release 1,100 secret assassination documents in 2013

Jim Garrison (Played By Kevin Costner): All these documents are yours. The people's property, you pay for it! But because the government considers you children who might be too disturbed or distressed to face this reality, or because you might possibly lynch those involved, you cannot see these documents for another seventy-five years. I'm in my early forties, so I'll have shuffled off this mortal coil by then, but I'm already telling my eight-year-old son to keep himself physically fit, so that one glorious September morning, in the year 2038, he can walk into the National Archives, and find out what the CIA and the FBI knew! They might even push it back then, hell it may become a generational affair, with questions passed down from father to son, mother to daughter, but someday, somewhere, somebody will find out the damn truth.


Link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0102138/quotes

****************************************************************

National Archives: No new JFK docs
Bowing to the CIA, the National Archives says it won't release 1,100 secret assassination documents in 2013

BY JEFFERSON MORLEY - Salon
THURSDAY, JUN 14, 2012 03:00 PM PDT


President and Mrs. Kennedy ride through Dallas moments before
Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963. (Credit: Reuters)


<snip>

Acquiescing to CIA demands for secrecy, the National Archives announced Wednesday that it will not release 1,171 top-secret Agency documents related to the assassination of President Kennedy in time for the 5oth anniversary of JFK’s death in November 2013.

“Is the government holding back crucial JFK documents,” asked Russ Baker in a WhoWhatWhy piece that Salon published last month. The answer, unfortunately, is yes. In a letter released this week, Gary Stern, general counsel for the National Archives and Record Administration, said the Archives would not release the records as part of the Obama administration’s ongoing declassification campaign. Stern cited CIA claims that “substantial logistical requirements” prevented their disclosure next year.

“This is a deeply disappointing decision that deprives everyone of a fuller understanding of the JFK assassination,” said Larry Sabato, a political scientist at the University of Virginia, who is writing a book about the impact of JFK’s assassination on American politics. “The 50th anniversary of that terrible event is the perfect opportunity to shed more light on the violent removal of a president. This adds to the widely held public suspicion that the government may still be hiding some key facts about President Kennedy’s murder.”

The records, requested by the nonprofit Assassination Archives and Research Center (AARC), will remain secret until at least 2017, when the 1992 JFK Records Act mandates public release of all assassination files in the government’s possession. (Full disclosure: AARC president Jim Lesar is my attorney in a Freedom of Information lawsuit seeking JFK records from the CIA.)

Among those seeking expedited disclosure were Notre Dame Law School professor G. Robert Blakey, who served as chief counsel for Congress’ JFK investigation in the late 1970s. In an email he accused the NARA of using “bureaucratic jargon to obfuscate its failure to vindicate the public interest in transparency, a goal touted no less than by the Obama administration. “

“It beggars the imagination to assert that documents (or portions thereof) can only be released in 2017, but not 2013,” said independent scholar Max Holland in an email. “I can understand a 100-year argument, in order to protect the identity of confidential sources (say a spy in Castro’s Politburo who said he didn’t do it); a 100-year rule would protect him or her. But 54 years versus 50? Doesn’t make sense … While it is true that JFK assassination is the most declassified event in U.S. history, in some respects NARA has done a poor job of carrying out the letter, spirit and intent of the JFK Act.”

<snip>

More: http://www.salon.com/2012/06/14/national_archives_no_new_jfk_docs/


60 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So if my suspicious tingle is correct... Scootaloo Jun 2012 #1
I'm going to be very vulgar, here malthaussen Jun 2012 #2
"The records...will remain secret until at least 2017". CJCRANE Jun 2012 #7
Sure, but the Act stipulates 2017 malthaussen Jun 2012 #8
Right-wing extremists, similar to the ones now a days, along with corporate backing has demosincebirth Jun 2012 #14
Or on a certain political family dynasty whose favorite son is still waiting . . . markpkessinger Jun 2012 #33
But... Kim Jong-un IS at the helm... Scootaloo Jun 2012 #36
A certain political dynasty... HooptieWagon Jun 2012 #50
Max Holland, what a laugh. JackRiddler Jun 2012 #3
worth a listen: Secret Service Vet With Very Strange JFK Story nashville_brook Jun 2012 #4
I had not heard this story. Positively chilling. Much goes on today that we know nothing about. northoftheborder Jun 2012 #35
Because Poppy Bush is still alive Politicalboi Jun 2012 #5
Ding ding ding Trailrider1951 Jun 2012 #11
You got it. Bush was in it up to his neck. Ikonoklast Jun 2012 #23
bingo grasswire Jun 2012 #26
Bush's statement that he doesn't remember where he was on Nov.22, 1963 . . markpkessinger Jun 2012 #31
Considered in the context of the longer political history, a remarkable pattern emerges . . . markpkessinger Jun 2012 #34
I'm thinking too many of the "actors" involved are not yet dead....n/t monmouth Jun 2012 #6
Yes...it's awful... thanks for reminding us. We will all be dead...and hopefully some GrandKid KoKo Jun 2012 #9
I think they are waiting for all of us to die off. Then they will feel safe... CTyankee Jun 2012 #16
There will be no USA then. WingDinger Jun 2012 #10
BTW...what went on in Dallas must be even WORSE than what we have suspected... KoKo Jun 2012 #12
+ 1,000,000,000... What You Said !!! WillyT Jun 2012 #13
What conceivable evidence "would finally put the conspiracy theories to bed"? Jim Lane Jun 2012 #46
Oswald did claim he was a "patsy" treestar Jun 2012 #55
It's always easier to find evidence for a conspiracy theory than against it. Jim Lane Jun 2012 #58
Well, two pretty nasty guys had a dream... malthaussen Jun 2012 #21
Like the War of the Roses The Wizard Jun 2012 #30
What was it that poppy bush said about us knowing what they have done? SammyWinstonJack Jun 2012 #57
transparency in government is a universal joke, democracy or dictatorship spanone Jun 2012 #15
The Italian Mafia killed JFK. matmar Jun 2012 #17
Ok... Who Hired Them ??? WillyT Jun 2012 #18
Let me clarify... matmar Jun 2012 #24
Ah... Gotcha...Thanks... One The Other Hand... WillyT Jun 2012 #27
All I can tell you is read Ultimate Sacrifice and you'll have your answers. matmar Jun 2012 #29
The people who killed JFK are the very ones preventing the release of these documents. Lint Head Jun 2012 #19
Castro isn't quite dead yet.... Mustellus Jun 2012 #20
it's almost 50 years -- stuff like this makes people think "cover-up". HiPointDem Jun 2012 #22
Translation WilliamPitt Jun 2012 #25
The CIA objects? Well, wonder if that indicates their culpability? calimary Jun 2012 #28
La la la! Nothing to see here! Time to move on. What's on TV? What did the Kardashians do? n/t RufusTFirefly Jun 2012 #32
I am betting that it would hurt Romney. nt siligut Jun 2012 #37
I can't believe this is still in GD johnnie Jun 2012 #38
Read Blood, Money & Power - How L.B.J. Killed J.F.K. by Barr McClellan Samantha Jun 2012 #39
"Do not forget your dying king." AtomicKitten Jun 2012 #40
Before 'JFK'... (From 1973)... WillyT Jun 2012 #41
Oswald did it. Alone. I know it is not as interesting as made up stuff, but it is the truth. n-t Logical Jun 2012 #42
Well If You Are Correct... What's The Fucking Problem ??? WillyT Jun 2012 #43
I 100% agree with you. Unless the papers make the CIA look bad in some other area. Like maybe.... Logical Jun 2012 #48
And BTW... WillyT Jun 2012 #44
People on every side of this issue are so fond of making their assertions as though they are fact. malthaussen Jun 2012 #45
Well, that means nothing. As I assume you know. If I can find 50 FBI agents who think he did it... Logical Jun 2012 #47
wow, you just solved the kennedy assassination and the ufo controversy in one post....utterly amazing spanone Jun 2012 #51
Then why are we not allowed to see the CIA data? jwirr Jun 2012 #52
If the secret documents were consistent with the official report, they wouldn't be secret. nt lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #49
Waiting for Daddy Bush to die? n/t mzteris Jun 2012 #53
"substantial logistical requirements" treestar Jun 2012 #54
Nothing new there twitter1 Jun 2012 #56
This message was self-deleted by its author ailsagirl Jun 2012 #59
The motorcade sulphurdunn Jun 2012 #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bowing To The CIA, The Na...