Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Why progressives should rescue the TPP trade deal [View all]
Good article on the TPP by Emily J. Blanchard, Associate Professor at Dartmouth College. The last point about how China will write the rules of global trade if the US fails to lead on this issue is especially important to graps for anyone who gives a damn about labor rights - or human rights in general.
Progressives, however, are making a mistake in rejecting the 12-country trade accord. As an economist who specializes in trade and trade agreements and as a progressive who believes in the importance of environmental protection, workers' rights and shared prosperity I believe the TPP presents a rare opportunity to rewrite key rules on global trade for the better.
The TPP is less about tariffs and more about creating a coherent global code of conduct for how firms do business in the world. Done right, the agreement would bring important new policy priorities to the negotiating table. It would be a shame to let this chance pass us by.
The TPP is less about tariffs and more about creating a coherent global code of conduct for how firms do business in the world. Done right, the agreement would bring important new policy priorities to the negotiating table. It would be a shame to let this chance pass us by.
There is no doubt that by cutting tariffs, the TPP will cost some jobs, even as it creates others. And in relatively wealthy countries like the U.S., the burden of job losses will likely be borne disproportionately by those workers already struggling from earlier waves of import competition and technological change.
But continuing mechanization and inevitable changes in what America is best at making will cause far more job displacement than proposed tariff cuts ever could, especially from the U.S. already very low tariff rates. Refusing to sign the TPP wont stop these ongoing and seismic shifts in the global workforce. Serious pro-worker policy proposals needs to begin by acknowledging this truth.
But continuing mechanization and inevitable changes in what America is best at making will cause far more job displacement than proposed tariff cuts ever could, especially from the U.S. already very low tariff rates. Refusing to sign the TPP wont stop these ongoing and seismic shifts in the global workforce. Serious pro-worker policy proposals needs to begin by acknowledging this truth.
The agreement is not perfect intellectual property rules are unarguably a compromise, and disciplines on rule-breaking behavior by firms or governments could be stronger but we need to be pragmatic.
Renegotiating the agreement which took seven years to hammer out is simply too risky. There is a very real prospect that our trading partners would refuse. And if the TPP fails, there is every reason to expect that China would write the rules instead, with a far less progressive agenda.
Renegotiating the agreement which took seven years to hammer out is simply too risky. There is a very real prospect that our trading partners would refuse. And if the TPP fails, there is every reason to expect that China would write the rules instead, with a far less progressive agenda.
http://theconversation.com/why-progressives-should-rescue-the-tpp-trade-deal-60304
Disclosure statement:
Emily J. Blanchard does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond the academic appointment above.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
58 replies, 2829 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
But I do not trust them to make sure it is "done right," and if it is done wrong, it will be a
tblue37
Jun 2016
#1
Well I don't trust economic nationalists to be open to immigration and globalization more broadly
YoungDemCA
Jun 2016
#2
And Democrats outside the Beltway love this 'progressive' deal for some reason.
pampango
Jun 2016
#7
True. And the republican base does not get to vote against it. Funny how that works indeed. n/t
pampango
Jun 2016
#13
Text TPP to 235246 and the AFL-CIO (Clinton backers) will connect you to your congressperson.
floriduck
Jun 2016
#4
If the details and negotiations will not stand the light of day then it cannot be good for us,
Ford_Prefect
Jun 2016
#9
The full details are available on government websites, you don't need any "hactivists" just read
Hoyt
Jun 2016
#27
The damn thing still SUCKS and is still written by hundreds of corporate lobbyists and executives.
think
Jun 2016
#29
There must be an awful lot of people who will buy a used car sight-unseen. Perfect analogy. nt
cherokeeprogressive
Jun 2016
#38
190 House Republicans voted to fast track this corporate trash. Only 28 Dems chose to. Over 150 Dems
think
Jun 2016
#31
150 Dems didn't run for president or write an NYT editorial trashing the president
MaggieD
Jun 2016
#33
How dare you say the House Dems had no alternate plan. They weren't invited. But the lobbyists were.
think
Jun 2016
#35
Please give me a link where Bernie says he is against free trade all together . Period.
think
Jun 2016
#40
and since no one knows what it states, how are we supposed to know what's what?
Javaman
Jun 2016
#20
You're complaining about not being able to read something that's been public for months
Recursion
Jun 2016
#55
She did not address TPP's “Asymmetrical investment protection” which the UN says is illegal
AntiBank
Jun 2016
#21
They're going to try every trick in the book to get us to swallow this bullshit.
arcane1
Jun 2016
#28
Actually, a country party to a trade agreement can sue any company that violates its laws. Now, if
Hoyt
Jun 2016
#32
I'm never eager to legitimize governments that execute LGBT. Feel free to do so yourself but
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2016
#34
Who said anything about legitimizing them? Constructive engagement =/= legitimizing
YoungDemCA
Jun 2016
#44
First, the TPP is a gift to the 1% and was negotiated by lobbyists and corporate
guillaumeb
Jun 2016
#51