Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

YoungDemCA

(5,714 posts)
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 03:03 PM Jun 2016

Why progressives should rescue the TPP trade deal [View all]

Good article on the TPP by Emily J. Blanchard, Associate Professor at Dartmouth College. The last point about how China will write the rules of global trade if the US fails to lead on this issue is especially important to graps for anyone who gives a damn about labor rights - or human rights in general.

Progressives, however, are making a mistake in rejecting the 12-country trade accord. As an economist who specializes in trade and trade agreements – and as a progressive who believes in the importance of environmental protection, workers' rights and shared prosperity – I believe the TPP presents a rare opportunity to rewrite key rules on global trade for the better.

The TPP is less about tariffs and more about creating a coherent global code of conduct for how firms do business in the world. Done right, the agreement would bring important new policy priorities to the negotiating table. It would be a shame to let this chance pass us by.


There is no doubt that by cutting tariffs, the TPP will cost some jobs, even as it creates others. And in relatively wealthy countries like the U.S., the burden of job losses will likely be borne disproportionately by those workers already struggling from earlier waves of import competition and technological change.

But continuing mechanization and inevitable changes in what America is best at making will cause far more job displacement than proposed tariff cuts ever could, especially from the U.S.’ already very low tariff rates. Refusing to sign the TPP won’t stop these ongoing and seismic shifts in the global workforce. Serious pro-worker policy proposals needs to begin by acknowledging this truth.


The agreement is not perfect – intellectual property rules are unarguably a compromise, and disciplines on rule-breaking behavior by firms or governments could be stronger – but we need to be pragmatic.

Renegotiating the agreement – which took seven years to hammer out – is simply too risky. There is a very real prospect that our trading partners would refuse. And if the TPP fails, there is every reason to expect that China would write the rules instead, with a far less progressive agenda.


http://theconversation.com/why-progressives-should-rescue-the-tpp-trade-deal-60304

Disclosure statement:
Emily J. Blanchard does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond the academic appointment above.
58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
But I do not trust them to make sure it is "done right," and if it is done wrong, it will be a tblue37 Jun 2016 #1
Well I don't trust economic nationalists to be open to immigration and globalization more broadly YoungDemCA Jun 2016 #2
And yet republicans in congress love this "progressive" deal for some reason arcane1 Jun 2016 #3
I agree Angry Dragon Jun 2016 #5
And Democrats outside the Beltway love this 'progressive' deal for some reason. pampango Jun 2016 #7
Funny how that works. But none of them get to vote for it n/t arcane1 Jun 2016 #10
True. And the republican base does not get to vote against it. Funny how that works indeed. n/t pampango Jun 2016 #13
Are you an economist that specializes in trade policy? ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #52
Trade deals aren't "progressive" they are liberal. nt fleabiscuit Jun 2016 #58
Text TPP to 235246 and the AFL-CIO (Clinton backers) will connect you to your congressperson. floriduck Jun 2016 #4
Progressives need to distance ourselves as far as possible from the TPP. w4rma Jun 2016 #6
That opening gambit about China is such an overused talkin point fasttense Jun 2016 #8
If the details and negotiations will not stand the light of day then it cannot be good for us, Ford_Prefect Jun 2016 #9
Your post sums up my feelings on this subject. nm emordnilaP Jun 2016 #25
The full details are available on government websites, you don't need any "hactivists" just read Hoyt Jun 2016 #27
The damn thing still SUCKS and is still written by hundreds of corporate lobbyists and executives. think Jun 2016 #29
There must be an awful lot of people who will buy a used car sight-unseen. Perfect analogy. nt cherokeeprogressive Jun 2016 #38
The NEW DU ... Pro-Fracking, Pro-TPP, Pro-Fossil Fuel ... Trajan Jun 2016 #11
But they're winning, which is apparently the only thing that matters n/t arcane1 Jun 2016 #14
+1000000 AntiBank Jun 2016 #22
.... bigwillq Jun 2016 #23
appears to be so. ciaobaby Jun 2016 #26
That's about the size of it. HughBeaumont Jun 2016 #49
Money quote: MaggieD Jun 2016 #12
I love the script you read from. Where can I get a copy? Ford_Prefect Jun 2016 #15
Read Bernie's NYT editorial today MaggieD Jun 2016 #17
190 House Republicans voted to fast track this corporate trash. Only 28 Dems chose to. Over 150 Dems think Jun 2016 #31
150 Dems didn't run for president or write an NYT editorial trashing the president MaggieD Jun 2016 #33
How dare you say the House Dems had no alternate plan. They weren't invited. But the lobbyists were. think Jun 2016 #35
Bernie doesn't want more input - he wants NO trade agreements, period MaggieD Jun 2016 #36
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #37
So give me a link to what he thinks the TPP needs to include.... MaggieD Jun 2016 #39
Please give me a link where Bernie says he is against free trade all together . Period. think Jun 2016 #40
A link - really? MaggieD Jun 2016 #50
Where did this meme of pining for the 1970s come from? Rex Jun 2016 #16
Listen to his speeches or read his NYT editorial today MaggieD Jun 2016 #18
He must have had better times then most in the 1970s. Rex Jun 2016 #19
From people complaining about free trade and "neoliberalism" Recursion Jun 2016 #46
Boring. Rex Jun 2016 #54
and since no one knows what it states, how are we supposed to know what's what? Javaman Jun 2016 #20
this shows how uninformed you are. drray23 Jun 2016 #30
well, thank you for the backhanded comment. Javaman Jun 2016 #43
You're complaining about not being able to read something that's been public for months Recursion Jun 2016 #55
FFS. The full text has been available for months Recursion Jun 2016 #47
A Trade Deal for the 21st Century: An Alternative to the TPP AntiBank Jun 2016 #24
She did not address TPP's “Asymmetrical investment protection” which the UN says is illegal AntiBank Jun 2016 #21
They're going to try every trick in the book to get us to swallow this bullshit. arcane1 Jun 2016 #28
Actually, a country party to a trade agreement can sue any company that violates its laws. Now, if Hoyt Jun 2016 #32
I would hardly call the people I have used extensively in my multiple AntiBank Jun 2016 #48
I'm never eager to legitimize governments that execute LGBT. Feel free to do so yourself but Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #34
Me either. Aerows Jun 2016 #42
Who said anything about legitimizing them? Constructive engagement =/= legitimizing YoungDemCA Jun 2016 #44
Because a pig in a poke Aerows Jun 2016 #41
TPP-ISDSnd the Democrats Arizona Roadrunner Jun 2016 #45
First, the TPP is a gift to the 1% and was negotiated by lobbyists and corporate guillaumeb Jun 2016 #51
I am confident, that Hillary, once elected will re-negotiate the TPP and make nest Jun 2016 #53
lulz Rex Jun 2016 #56
No friggin' sale. bullwinkle428 Jun 2016 #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why progressives should r...