General Discussion

RAFisher

(466 posts)

12. Who the hell watches their ad and thinks "nope, not an assault rife"

Reply to Bucky (Original post)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 11:27 PM

Jun 2016

https://www.ispot.tv/ad/7iuA/sig-sauer-mcx-new-era

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

347 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Dear pedantic shits saying it's a Sig Sauer MCX, not an AR-15, and not an assault rifle: FUCK YOU [View all] Bucky Jun 2016 OP

K&R baldguy Jun 2016 #1

Thank you Bucky lunatica Jun 2016 #2

As I wrote, but you put it more bluntly. uppityperson Jun 2016 #3

I add my fuck you also gopiscrap Jun 2016 #4

You beat me to it... and a "fuck you" from me too! InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #34

Let me third that and add my Fuck You also Canoe52 Jun 2016 #190

All excellent points. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #271

Could he have used RPGs instead.Just where do we draw the line? bjobotts Jun 2016 #232

I just pictured someone hitting someone else with a copy of Settlers of Catan AtheistCrusader Jun 2016 #234

GO TO YOUTUBE, SEARCH OUT VIDEOS. cynzke Jun 2016 #255

Bravo! librarylu Jun 2016 #5

The idea of people having guns to protect themselves from the government Stonepounder Jun 2016 #29

Excuse me? librarylu Jun 2016 #36

I think he got on a rant and stopped talking to you part way through. nilram Jun 2016 #47

I sure hope so. librarylu Jun 2016 #52

Stonepounder is using a rhetorical 'you', kentauros Jun 2016 #81

I think he switched to the general you Bettie Jun 2016 #178

It would have been good librarylu Jun 2016 #189

Yeah I get that Bettie Jun 2016 #324

Apologies. Stonepounder Jun 2016 #191

Apology accepted. librarylu Jun 2016 #195

"Yeehawdists" I love it! Glaisne Jun 2016 #210

Go right ahead. librarylu Jun 2016 #212

"Yeehawdists"= most brilliant thing I've read today The Green Manalishi Jun 2016 #247

I hate that argument. Buzz cook Jun 2016 #59

After Katrina the government went door to door collecting guns. No one thought rhett o rick Jun 2016 #220

I started to slam your post. bvar22 Jun 2016 #306

I saw it at the time and couldn't believe that more of an issue wasn't made of it. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #313

oh god. yes mercuryblues Jun 2016 #113

The AR platform and variants are one of the most common rifles owned. Ikonoklast Jun 2016 #122

Identify, processing, data output : MyNameGoesHere Jun 2016 #130

I don't watch professional basketball. Ikonoklast Jun 2016 #134

New Android phone, I have trained it to my interests yet MyNameGoesHere Jun 2016 #141

This is why your rights under the 4th and the 14th are being eroded right now. Ikonoklast Jun 2016 #145

Ahh we should do nothing to prevent massacres Glaisne Jun 2016 #211

It's all just collateral damage Bettie Jun 2016 #327

Perspective. AtheistCrusader Jun 2016 #205

False equivalency Saviolo Jun 2016 #168

Well said, Glaisne Jun 2016 #214

I have used a firearm Elmergantry Jun 2016 #227

So, what you mean to say is Saviolo Jun 2016 #229

"If a gun is used as intended and designed, it kills someone" Nonsense. EX500rider Jun 2016 #308

Please. Saviolo Jun 2016 #315

So do you thing 80 million American gun owners are using them wrong then? EX500rider Jun 2016 #331

I admit in my post Saviolo Jun 2016 #332

Huh? Wha? vkkv Jun 2016 #242

Anyone that uses the non word "gub'mnt" as a substitute for "government" Calista241 Jun 2016 #245

You've got too much time on your hands. vkkv Jun 2016 #250

Numbers? Straw Man Jun 2016 #264

That's a pretty funny interpretation! vkkv Jun 2016 #274

Funny? Straw Man Jun 2016 #276

The diffference, Ikonoklast, is that with hands and feet no single person... Nitram Jun 2016 #169

Chuck Norris could R.A. Ganoush Jun 2016 #326

I've got a friend who is very liberal in every respect except... RiverNoord Jun 2016 #231

They can snoop your email, audit your taxes, file a dozen court cases on you... AR15s won't help Bucky Jun 2016 #323

+1 Fuck You tallahasseedem Jun 2016 #6

Thank you! And yes, FUCK the gun-nuts who indirectly support mass-slaughter Dem2 Jun 2016 #7

a killing machine by any other name..... spanone Jun 2016 #8

Please add my Fuck You to your Fuck You. Stinky The Clown Jun 2016 #9

+1 Agschmid Jun 2016 #156

Oh yes this ^^^^^^^ Arazi Jun 2016 #10

"High volume murder machine" seems... 3catwoman3 Jun 2016 #11

Who the hell watches their ad and thinks "nope, not an assault rife" RAFisher Jun 2016 #12

Anyone who knows what an assault rifle actually is. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #65

Who in his right mind cares about the semantic distinction when a non-assault rifle pnwmom Jun 2016 #104

Ask RAFisher. He brought it up. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #105

But you seemed to think it important to add that machine guns haven't been sold pnwmom Jun 2016 #108

You are a member of the group ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #109

Yes, I'm of the group that wants to ban these weapons on the basis of functionality. pnwmom Jun 2016 #111

Most modern firearms have this functionality. AtheistCrusader Jun 2016 #207

There is a reason that certain firearms are chosen for these terrorists acts. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #230

There is no distinguishing difference between that AR-15 and XYZ semi-auto rifle with a detachable AtheistCrusader Jun 2016 #233

Let's start with magazines and bullet types. Rifles designed to kill humans like tumbling bullets. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #236

.223 ammo does not use "tumbling" bullets. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #251

You only address the functionality of the hardware. The looks of guns are that way for a purpose, rhett o rick Jun 2016 #279

Shape and materials. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #284

Civilian ammo is not designed to tumble. AtheistCrusader Jun 2016 #253

This conversation is about trying to solve the problem of mass terrorist shootings. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #278

I appreciate the goal, but not the tactics you employ to get there. AtheistCrusader Jun 2016 #329

A tumbling bullet is a defective bullet. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #272

Wrong. The AR-15 was designed so that the bullet becomes unstable in flight and starts to rhett o rick Jun 2016 #277

Incorrect, as usual. Consult Rose's "American Rifle:. A Biography" to confirm the myth Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #280

Rhett, you have been watching too many Hollywood movies. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #285

Myth. If the bullet was unstable in flight, it wouldn't be accurate past 50 feet. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #289

That would be incorrect. They do not tumble in flight. That totally throws off their accuracy. Waldorf Jun 2016 #294

incorrect sir Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #298

It wasn't designed for accuracy at 500 meters. It was designed to kill humans. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #316

And you would be wrong again Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #317

You seem to get off on telling me I am wrong but not proving it. Medium range isn't 500 yds. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #318

It doesn't use special ammo. The ammo that I shoot thru my AR-15's is the exact same thing Waldorf Jun 2016 #290

You are a member of the group Atticus Jun 2016 #158

We need more.. disillusioned73 Jun 2016 #184

Coming from you, I will take that as a complement. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #223

Don't go accusing others of being bullshit merchants, then post that. beevul Jun 2016 #238

So, is it difficult to breathe with your head WAY up there? Atticus Jun 2016 #249

That is still not full auto Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #287

Uh-huh. A rubber band, huh? Cool story, dude. nt Atticus Jun 2016 #291

You must have missed that story, ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #295

Yep, saw that one Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #296

Beware "rubber band and an AR-15 type weapon Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #297

No, the air is fine here. beevul Jun 2016 #309

Could you point me towards any training that is designed to teach how to WOUND? Thor_MN Jun 2016 #322

Training? beevul Jun 2016 #330

Yes, arm chairs warriors are quick to point out how wounding is better, Thor_MN Jun 2016 #336

Where is this training given on the ar-15 design? beevul Jun 2016 #338

I asked you a question. Where is the military or any shooting training that teaches to wound. Thor_MN Jun 2016 #340

A meaningless question. beevul Jun 2016 #342

Well, that's just, like your opinion, man. Thor_MN Jun 2016 #343

Fortunately most of America agrees with my opinion. beevul Jun 2016 #344

You are not correct. Most of America favors increased firearm regulation. Thor_MN Jun 2016 #345

Because people keep talking about banning machine guns in response. AtheistCrusader Jun 2016 #206

Two reasons. AtheistCrusader Jun 2016 #199

Derp. HuckleB Jun 2016 #256

AR variants are not less lethal than a full auto assault rifle They are in fact more accurate, Monk06 Jun 2016 #282

True about comparing semi-auto and full-auto rifles in human hands. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #286

You brought up the distinction between 'Assault rifles' and the semi auto AR so I figured make Monk06 Jun 2016 #293

Nobody, because the ad doesn't claim it's an assault rifle. AtheistCrusader Jun 2016 #198

Marketing schmarketing. HuckleB Jun 2016 #257

Please don't dismiss it so readily. AtheistCrusader Jun 2016 #261

LOL. It's always funny when gun lovers act like "assault rife" is some scientific term RAFisher Jun 2016 #283

Not scientific, but standardized. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #288

It's called Military Nomenclature. AtheistCrusader Jun 2016 #328

mass murder weapons shouldn't be available southmost Jun 2016 #13

People hunt in Australia, Ireland, and other gun control countries IronLionZion Jun 2016 #14

they're "whackers": they sit around the basement hoard and the gun range talking about the minutiae MisterP Jun 2016 #15

Well put jberryhill Jun 2016 #16

+1 Fucking A fleabiscuit Jun 2016 #17

K & R 63splitwindow Jun 2016 #18

I'd like to join you in saying... wysi Jun 2016 #19

lol yeah retrowire Jun 2016 #20

YES !!! KT2000 Jun 2016 #21

100% agree, Bucky bearssoapbox Jun 2016 #22

Absofuckinglutely! ReRe Jun 2016 #23

Please allow me to add my voice to this ringing "FUCK YOU" n/t TygrBright Jun 2016 #24

Much Awesomeness postatomic Jun 2016 #25

It's an example of how soul-sick they all are villager Jun 2016 #26

Hi, Central FL gay man here. ImLiberalNotLeftist Jun 2016 #27

how does limiting the number of bullets in a cartridge/container, make your gun useless? uppityperson Jun 2016 #35

Some are. At the least, have them rendered a bit less effective via mag limits. jmg257 Jun 2016 #37

What makes your two AR-15 rifles different? Demit Jun 2016 #60

Different manufacturers ImLiberalNotLeftist Jun 2016 #89

What do you use them for? JustAnotherGen Jun 2016 #103

I'm just taking a wild guess Travis_0004 Jun 2016 #133

Probably a good guess Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #138

Ahh JustAnotherGen Jun 2016 #165

who said anything about two at the same time? Travis_0004 Jun 2016 #221

The guy above said he had TWO guns - same type Travis JustAnotherGen Jun 2016 #226

Unlikely Travis_0004 Jun 2016 #240

Only if you are being literal JustAnotherGen Jun 2016 #241

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #310

This message was self-deleted by its author ncjustice80 Jun 2016 #117

Yes. paleotn Jun 2016 #125

Oh heavens no I would never suggest the markets control you MyNameGoesHere Jun 2016 #131

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #311

Possessions. Now you're getting into the founders spirit MyNameGoesHere Jun 2016 #321

How about getting rid of ALL guns? MadDAsHell Jun 2016 #28

How? Details, please. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #92

Pass a new ban on "military" style weapons and ammunition. ncjustice80 Jun 2016 #119

So my 1926 bolt action mosin Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #127

And if you don't turn it in, you'll face "severe" criminal penalties! Just reading posts Jun 2016 #181

Of course you'll need lots of guns to disarm everyone TampaAnimusVortex Jun 2016 #192

Like Australia! ncjustice80 Jun 2016 #215

Not quite... TampaAnimusVortex Jun 2016 #254

Likely, yes. ncjustice80 Jun 2016 #216

So a double barreled shotgun or lever action rifle would both be illegal. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #179

But why are you only trying to limit those guns, when handguns kill so many more each year? MadDAsHell Jun 2016 #185

Add one more big Fuck You SwankyXomb Jun 2016 #30

Gun-humpers have been twisting themselves into knots for years trying to downplay the Aristus Jun 2016 #31

And most of them have never had a need for a gun for self protection in the first place passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #40

You have a knack with titles. Excellent post too. Every gun yahoo should read this. Hoyt Jun 2016 #32

Or have it read to them... Aristus Jun 2016 #175

+1. Back in the day, to get our first drivers license we had to watch this horrible film of Hoyt Jun 2016 #194

Yep, I remember those. *Warning - Disturbing Images* geardaddy Jun 2016 #273

and they're beergood Jun 2016 #346

Damn, that's sobering. We should regulate how safe those things can be & where they're allowed Bucky Jun 2016 #347

... Marie Marie Jun 2016 #33

How is an assault rifle with a folding stock for ease of smuggling into a crowded space even legal? SunSeeker Jun 2016 #38

Because the law sets a minimum length for rifles Recursion Jun 2016 #41

But WHY? Why allow rifles with folding fucking stocks? SunSeeker Jun 2016 #43

Because the law prevents rifles from being short enough to be concealable? Recursion Jun 2016 #44

If the law prevents concealable rifles, why are folding rifle stocks legal? SunSeeker Jun 2016 #49

Because their folded length is long enough it's not concealable Recursion Jun 2016 #56

There you go, bringing facts into the discussion. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #63

What "facts"? The fucking thing WAS CONCEALED. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #66

Yes, some people are big enough to conceal a rifle under their coat. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #69

No, he got confronted and shot at at the front door by an armed guard Recursion Jun 2016 #72

Rachel Maddow did a whole segment about that gun and how the killer managed to get it in the club. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #75

If that's true and the AP is wrong, then we need to increase the minimum gun length Recursion Jun 2016 #77

Being tall has its advantages for both ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #80

Yes, minimum rifle length needs to be increased. AND we need an AWB. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #84

Right now it's 26". What do you propose? Just reading posts Jun 2016 #86

The AWB did not give us a Republican president. SCOTUS did. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #95

Had guns not been an issue in 2000, Gore would have won. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #96

No we do not. It's a stupid law that does no good. It keeps the gun he used legal Recursion Jun 2016 #94

The FBI concluded that the AWB had little to no effect on gun crime. Ikonoklast Jun 2016 #115

That report says right on the first page it does not reflect the views of the Department of Justice. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #213

And that's not surprising if only because the AWB allowed manufacturers to continue selling PoliticAverse Jun 2016 #218

The law can be written to not allow them to be foldable if they are sold pnwmom Jun 2016 #262

I agree, and that's entirely within Congress's authority to do. It's also completely backwards. Recursion Jun 2016 #305

They are legal because ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #67

Gotta love that "easy storage" under your jacket! SunSeeker Jun 2016 #68

Your use of "storage" would be non-standard. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #71

Stop with the inane pedantics the OP is talking about. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #76

Use the correct words and we will stop correcting your mistakes. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #78

We're not the ones making mistakes. nt SunSeeker Jun 2016 #87

OK then. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #91

+A lot. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #88

This message was self-deleted by its author hack89 Jun 2016 #121

Here's the law regarding the minimum length of a rifle: Just reading posts Jun 2016 #50

A man can (and did) conceal it in his jacket. It should be illegal. nt SunSeeker Jun 2016 #53

Well, it's not. Nor is it likely to be for the foreseeable future. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #54

I don't have to accept that. Neither do you. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #55

Well...unless you have the power to change it, in point of fact you do. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #57

Of course we have the power to change it. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #58

Not this year. And in any case, I've never seen a single serious proposal to change the defintiion Just reading posts Jun 2016 #62

You posted it to support your implication that folding stocks don't make it concealable. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #64

The size of the rifle is obvious. It's not a handgun, for pete's sake. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #82

No, I didn't "ask for it." Neither do gun humpers' victims. nt SunSeeker Jun 2016 #85

"Gun humpers"? Way to elevate the conversation. What is this, 6th grade? Just reading posts Jun 2016 #93

Typical. Gun humper gets called a gun humper by posting NRA drivel and gun porn Feeling the Bern Jun 2016 #300

So....the answer to my question is "yes". Good to know. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #307

Even yet more gun porn. longship Jun 2016 #100

It's hardly "porn". The other poster expressed concern that the first picture didn't have the Just reading posts Jun 2016 #101

In other words... Gun porn. Twice in this thread. longship Jun 2016 #107

Don't you get sick of the predictable, thin skinned path gun huggers take each time someone dares Feeling the Bern Jun 2016 #320

I see we can use that to hunt squirrels and small game. Feeling the Bern Jun 2016 #299

While it's overpowered for squirrels, the .223 cartridge is considered a small game round. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #304

Thanks, gun hugger. I really don't care about murder enablers. Feeling the Bern Jun 2016 #319

Thank you! passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #39

Thank you Bucky!!! tosh Jun 2016 #42

Well spoken, sir. Get all of these things out of circulation, or limit the magazine Francis Booth Jun 2016 #45

How do you propose to get them out of circulation? Voluntary buyback, or confiscation? Just reading posts Jun 2016 #51

The government would have to compensate for the value of the magazine, but they Francis Booth Jun 2016 #123

The magazines in and of themselves, perhaps there are a billion or so in circulation. But if you add Just reading posts Jun 2016 #187

The only thing that might work to ge them banned... potone Jun 2016 #46

No. . .maybe if someone important to these gun humpers like LaPierre and the jerks in Congress died Feeling the Bern Jun 2016 #301

I love on-the-spot rants like this ! King_Klonopin Jun 2016 #48

Exactly. HuckleB Jun 2016 #61

It's actually SIG not Sig - acronym for Schweizerische Industriegesellschaft aikoaiko Jun 2016 #70

Paradigm shift in gun control? are.you.sure Jun 2016 #73

No. Nothing will come of this in regards to legislation. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #97

And what about people who handload their own ammunition? TheMightyFavog Jun 2016 #102

Terrible idea. Just get rid of firearms that will fire over one round in a few seconds and no vkkv Jun 2016 #244

Most of the mass shooters didn't care if they got caught TexasBushwhacker Jun 2016 #281

Yeah been trying not to say anything about that. Rex Jun 2016 #74

While most rifles of this particular model are .22 caliber (.223 to be exact), they're also Just reading posts Jun 2016 #98

I want someone to look the dead victims families in the eye and tell them that. If they Rex Jun 2016 #99

O oh...you listed the RED ROUND (Russian Round)!!! yourpaljoey Jun 2016 #201

I prefer 5.45x39, myself. That what my AKs are chambered for. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #202

Whew... close call yourpaljoey Jun 2016 #204

No danger of that. I don't have any .223 ARs, only NATO Spec 5.56. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #209

Thank you RandySF Jun 2016 #79

From "Pedantic shits", to "Take the toys away from the boys", BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2016 #83

look most of us here I think MFM008 Jun 2016 #90

FBI Stats on Homicide from 2009 to 2013 bighart Jun 2016 #162

of course MFM008 Jun 2016 #248

Rifle homicides bighart Jun 2016 #252

I am a gun owner MFM008 Jun 2016 #325

The important question is: ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #335

yes MFM008 Jun 2016 #337

Someone else already said it, so I'll just be the echo. pnwmom Jun 2016 #106

+1000 nt ProudProgressiveNow Jun 2016 #110

Most excellent rant, Bucky. nt brer cat Jun 2016 #112

Anyone who protests "but they are fun to shoot" should have Ilsa Jun 2016 #114

Than you K&R myrna minx Jun 2016 #116

Right there with you, buddy. yardwork Jun 2016 #118

When a bomb goes off, it's important to discern what kinds of chemicals the bomb used. DetlefK Jun 2016 #120

And the argument they follow with is "which one of those types of guns do you want to Squinch Jun 2016 #302

Strong measures are overdue maindawg Jun 2016 #124

A-fucking-men. These guns are not used to hunt or defend. They are used with alcohol around .... marble falls Jun 2016 #126

Must be millions killed by these rifles then, tight? Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #129

So why do you own one? marble falls Jun 2016 #135

Not to kill people Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #136

So why do you own one? marble falls Jun 2016 #137

Shoot at paper plates Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #139

Ever hear of a bb gun? Absolute hell on a paperplate. Quit buying armored paper plates. marble falls Jun 2016 #140

Not accurate Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #142

How accurate do need to be with a paper plate? I'ne never needed a second round to put one one .... marble falls Jun 2016 #144

To shoot paper plates Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #147

So you really don't know or you feel embarressed about your reason? .... marble falls Jun 2016 #148

I know, yes Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #149

Do you use Stingers to hunt duck? marble falls Jun 2016 #151

I don't hunt Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #152

Why do you own one? marble falls Jun 2016 #153

To shoot paper plates Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #155

If that's the best you can do .... marble falls Jun 2016 #163

You asked, I answered Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #166

You are one nutty gun owner, but we knew that before. Nt Logical Jun 2016 #224

Why thank you for the insult Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #225

hear hear! uncle ray Jun 2016 #128

Very well said! +1000 paleotn Jun 2016 #132

This is a time-honored gun-fondler strategy Act_of_Reparation Jun 2016 #143

Straight out of the NRA handbook titled, "How to Lose Your Humanity So You Can Squinch Jun 2016 #303

Bucky, this is a righteous rant for the ages. I had to deal with these sorts of Nay Jun 2016 #146

Bravo!!!! tavernier Jun 2016 #150

That is the tactic, get you trapped into arguments about petty details liberal N proud Jun 2016 #154

I got some advice for you....... Darb Jun 2016 #157

I completely agree! Javaman Jun 2016 #159

Yep rock Jun 2016 #160

Thank you Bucky. (nt) enough Jun 2016 #161

Agreed! MynameisBlarney Jun 2016 #164

The problem is that it is very hard to ban assault rifles because Nitram Jun 2016 #167

Sigh, I know. I would okay with less tecky language in the law that bans "too many" guns Bucky Jun 2016 #196

Right on, Bucky. Beautifully put. Paladin Jun 2016 #170

So true; one does NOT need an auto for hunting moose. raven mad Jun 2016 #171

He didn't use an "auto"....it was an ordinary semiautomatic rifle. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #182

You're quite correct. raven mad Jun 2016 #186

Always use enough gun. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #188

Wish I could rec this 1,000 times malaise Jun 2016 #172

You don't know pedantic until you try to argue with a gun-nut Dem2 Jun 2016 #173

50 people murdered in 20 minutes. There's zero justification for this, gun nuts. Zero. Initech Jun 2016 #174

I haven't seen a single post justifying these murders. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #183

Bigtime, FUCK YOU's.. disillusioned73 Jun 2016 #176

This message was self-deleted by its author Pacifist Patriot Jun 2016 #177

Truth! billh58 Jun 2016 #180

It happened to me too. TRoN33 Jun 2016 #193

Assault weapon is correct. Assault rifle is not. You mix the terms in your first paragraph. AtheistCrusader Jun 2016 #197

Thank you for the clarification. I'm a total definition geek, you're right. Bucky Jun 2016 #200

I do try. I try. AtheistCrusader Jun 2016 #203

A big @#$% you to the gun huggers and their moist chit chat about @#$% no one else cares about. Scurrilous Jun 2016 #208

America's gun problem explained pauldp Jun 2016 #217

Well done! Gidney N Cloyd Jun 2016 #219

Damn straight. RiverNoord Jun 2016 #222

You sure post 'FUCK YOU' a lot. Feel better ? Need a nap ? Bonx Jun 2016 #228

Nope, he is sick of gun nut bullshit. Proper language! Nt Logical Jun 2016 #237

I guess it's an option to tell people 'FUCK YOU!" when you don't have your own facts straight Bonx Jun 2016 #243

It does seem extraordinarily childish. Just sayin'. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #259

Whine some more. I'll listen. nt Logical Jun 2016 #292

. emmadoggy Jun 2016 #235

Perfect response bbmykel Jun 2016 #239

There will always exist the half-wit who pretends that nothing can be done LanternWaste Jun 2016 #246

Aren't most of your posts about how nothing can be done about most things? HuckleB Jun 2016 #258

Kick. Good post! Squinch Jun 2016 #260

There is one EXCELLENT reason to get the weapon right IN THIS CASE... 63splitwindow Jun 2016 #263

The Ron White School of Rhetoric Straw Man Jun 2016 #265

now look, I'm a Texas boy. If you hear Ron White in my prose, I'm honored. But... Bucky Jun 2016 #268

I LOVE that this has 315 RECs etherealtruth Jun 2016 #266

(me too) Bucky Jun 2016 #269

Kick and rec! zappaman Jun 2016 #267

Every single one of them! Iggo Jun 2016 #270

I'll echo this. FUCK YOU, YOU FUCKING FUCKWADS! Arugula Latte Jun 2016 #275

M-16 The Wizard Jun 2016 #312

You almost got it right. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #314

The newer 16s only shoot in three shot bursts. The Wizard Jun 2016 #333

Correct on the mechanical updates to the M-16 and M-4. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #334

Preach It Brother Bucky! Dyedinthewoolliberal Jun 2016 #339

I'm also sick of the "hero with the gun argument" sakabatou Jun 2016 #341