Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Every election we lose is not because of fraud! [View all]WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)87. We lost in WI because 70% of the voters oppose recalls either everytime
or if there isn't something to do with ethics/criminal activity. They should be happy when he is indicted!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
149 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Chain of custody broken in Ohio in 2004, in San Diego in 2006, in New Hampshire in 2008,
EFerrari
Jun 2012
#98
No, he is not: you simply do not have the proof to offer that has been requested of you repeatedly.
apocalypsehow
Jun 2012
#53
Wait, you and others on this thread are accepting a result reflexively because it was presented
EFerrari
Jun 2012
#82
This is not a criminal case, there is no innocent until proven guilty in transparency matters
Bjorn Against
Jun 2012
#54
That is utter tripe. The default position of any scientist or computer programmer
eridani
Jun 2012
#126
There are right-wingers who think the results of the 2008 election were not valid.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Jun 2012
#102
I know you think this is a clever tactic, but, in fact, the burden of proof is on YOU and others
apocalypsehow
Jun 2012
#52
I am not asserting anything, those who say it is legitimate are making assertions
Bjorn Against
Jun 2012
#71
Provide evidence of fraud, or go away and cease embarrasing DU. It is that simple. n/t.
apocalypsehow
Jun 2012
#77
Provide evidence of fraud, or go away and cease embarrasing DU. It is that simple. n/t.
apocalypsehow
Jun 2012
#88
Provide evidence of fraud, or go away and cease embarrasing DU. It is that simple. n/t.
apocalypsehow
Jun 2012
#147
Bad intent isn't even necessary for bad results. The software could simply be crap
gkhouston
Jun 2012
#131
The problem with the idea that poll watchers or the DoJ watched this election closely
EFerrari
Jun 2012
#97
Horseshit. If I give you a lab report asserting that there are x parts per million
eridani
Jun 2012
#129
The conspiracy theory is that you can know the results of an election counted in secret.
EFerrari
Jun 2012
#22
One election we lose due to fraud DOES = every election is suspcious I'm not going to forget Bush 01
uponit7771
Jun 2012
#4
There is a problem with the "Had the recount continued to completion" thing.
GarroHorus
Jun 2012
#26
We know Repukes will cheat. I think they cheat whether they need to or not. As far as I am concerned
rhett o rick
Jun 2012
#32
Pardon me, but don't we need to be concerned about BOTH? What about Florida?
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jun 2012
#35
Voter caging in Florida altered the national political landscape and impacted the world
L. Coyote
Jun 2012
#70
In the absence of transparent elections, we have no way to assess the truth of your assertion. n/t
gkhouston
Jun 2012
#43
I haven't read one case on DU of someone saying every election we lose is because of fraud.
Prometheus Bound
Jun 2012
#50
There was all kind of discussion of NY when they were trying to get rid of the lever machines.
EFerrari
Jun 2012
#116
I can state that there has been fraud in every election since 2000. That I know.
robinlynne
Jun 2012
#76
Of course not but since elections are not transparent and worse the opposition owns
TheKentuckian
Jun 2012
#66
I am sure that many of the people claiming this is fraud because . . . well it just is
4th law of robotics
Jun 2012
#106