Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Glenn Greenwald meet Ron Paul [View all]
Greenwald:
<...>
There are many reasons why the media is eager to disappear Ron Paul despite his being a viable candidate by every objective metric. Unlike the charismatic Perry and telegenic Bachmann, Paul bores the media with his earnest focus on substantive discussions. Theres also the notion that hes too heterodox for the purist GOP primary base, though that was what was repeatedly said about McCain when his candidacy was declared dead.
But what makes the media most eager to disappear Paul is that he destroys the easy, conventional narrative for slothful media figures and for Democratic loyalists alike. Aside from the truly disappeared former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson (more on him in a moment), Ron Paul is far and away the most anti-war, anti-Surveillance-State, anti-crony-capitalism, and anti-drug-war presidential candidate in either party. How can the conventional narrative of extremist/nationalistic/corporatist/racist/warmongering GOP v. the progressive/peaceful/anti-corporate/poor-and-minority-defending Democratic Party be reconciled with the fact that a candidate with those positions just virtually tied for first place among GOP base voters in Iowa? Not easily, and Paul is thus disappeared from existence. That the similarly anti-war, pro-civil-liberties, anti-drug-war Gary Johnson is not even allowed in media debates despite being a twice-elected popular governor highlights the same dynamic.
http://www.salon.com/2011/08/16/elections_9/
There are many reasons why the media is eager to disappear Ron Paul despite his being a viable candidate by every objective metric. Unlike the charismatic Perry and telegenic Bachmann, Paul bores the media with his earnest focus on substantive discussions. Theres also the notion that hes too heterodox for the purist GOP primary base, though that was what was repeatedly said about McCain when his candidacy was declared dead.
But what makes the media most eager to disappear Paul is that he destroys the easy, conventional narrative for slothful media figures and for Democratic loyalists alike. Aside from the truly disappeared former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson (more on him in a moment), Ron Paul is far and away the most anti-war, anti-Surveillance-State, anti-crony-capitalism, and anti-drug-war presidential candidate in either party. How can the conventional narrative of extremist/nationalistic/corporatist/racist/warmongering GOP v. the progressive/peaceful/anti-corporate/poor-and-minority-defending Democratic Party be reconciled with the fact that a candidate with those positions just virtually tied for first place among GOP base voters in Iowa? Not easily, and Paul is thus disappeared from existence. That the similarly anti-war, pro-civil-liberties, anti-drug-war Gary Johnson is not even allowed in media debates despite being a twice-elected popular governor highlights the same dynamic.
http://www.salon.com/2011/08/16/elections_9/
Flashback: One person voted against the original Afghanistan AUMF
Barbara Lee
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2001/roll342.xml
Ron Paul voted yes.
In 2007, the House voted to 218 to 212 to Set Date for Iraq Pullout
NYT: House, 218 to 212, Votes to Set Date for Iraq Pullout
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/24/washington/24cong.html
Ron Paul voted no
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2007/roll186.xml
In 2007, Ron Paul introduced the Marque and Reprisal Act of 2007
Marque and Reprisal Act of 2007 - Authorizes and requests the President to issue letters of marque and reprisal to commission privately armed and equipped persons and entities to seize outside of the United States the person and property of Osama bin Laden, of any al Qaeda co-conspirator, and any conspirator with Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda who are responsible for the air piratical aggressions against the United States on September 11, 2001, and for any planned similar acts or acts of war against the United States in the future.
States that no letter of marque and reprisal shall be issued without the posting of a security bond in such amount as the President determines sufficient to ensure the letter's execution.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-110hr3216ih/pdf/BILLS-110hr3216ih.pdf
States that no letter of marque and reprisal shall be issued without the posting of a security bond in such amount as the President determines sufficient to ensure the letter's execution.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-110hr3216ih/pdf/BILLS-110hr3216ih.pdf
Of course when he introduced it in 2001, it was "for the capture, alive or dead, of Osama bin Laden or any other al Qaeda conspirator"
September 11 Marque and Reprisal Act of 2001
<...>
(b) The President of the United States is authorized to place a money bounty, drawn in his discretion from the $40,000,000,000 appropriated on September 14, 2001, in the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Recovery from and Response to Terrorists Attacks on the United States or from private sources, for the capture, alive or dead, of Osama bin Laden or any other al Qaeda conspirator responsible for the act of air piracy upon the United States on September 11, 2001, under the authority of any letter of marque or reprisal issued under this Act.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-107hr3076ih/pdf/BILLS-107hr3076ih.pdf
(b) The President of the United States is authorized to place a money bounty, drawn in his discretion from the $40,000,000,000 appropriated on September 14, 2001, in the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Recovery from and Response to Terrorists Attacks on the United States or from private sources, for the capture, alive or dead, of Osama bin Laden or any other al Qaeda conspirator responsible for the act of air piracy upon the United States on September 11, 2001, under the authority of any letter of marque or reprisal issued under this Act.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-107hr3076ih/pdf/BILLS-107hr3076ih.pdf
Ex-Aide: Ron Paul Foreign Policy is 'Sheer Lunacy'
Ron Paul is not having the best holiday season. First the media discovered racist, anti-Semitic newsletters that went out under Pauls name in the 1970s, 80s and 90s. Then the New York Times did a story about the support Paul draws from white supremacists and anti-Semites.
Now theres former Paul staffer Eric Dondero purporting to describe the ins and outs of Pauls positions on everything from Israel (it shouldnt exist) to Hitler (we shouldnt have fought him) to 9/11 (U.S. authorities may have known about the attacks) to Afghanistan (we shouldnt have invaded). He calls Pauls foreign policy sheer lunacy.
Or, as the conservative Weekly Standard summarized in hits headline: Ex-Aide Says Ron Paul Is a 9/11 Truther & Isolationist Who Thinks U.S. Shouldn't Have Fought Hitler.
In his 2,100-word piece, posted at RightwingNews.com, Dondero says he held several campaign and Capitol Hill posts with Paul from 1987 to 2003. At his own website, LibertarianRepublican.net, he said he was revealing much of the information for the first time. Much of what I have to say will not please the liberal media hacks. Though, the Ron Paul diehards will find much objectionable, as well, Dondero wrote.
http://news.yahoo.com/ex-aide-ron-paul-foreign-policy-sheer-lunacy-144730256.html
Ron Paul is not having the best holiday season. First the media discovered racist, anti-Semitic newsletters that went out under Pauls name in the 1970s, 80s and 90s. Then the New York Times did a story about the support Paul draws from white supremacists and anti-Semites.
Now theres former Paul staffer Eric Dondero purporting to describe the ins and outs of Pauls positions on everything from Israel (it shouldnt exist) to Hitler (we shouldnt have fought him) to 9/11 (U.S. authorities may have known about the attacks) to Afghanistan (we shouldnt have invaded). He calls Pauls foreign policy sheer lunacy.
Or, as the conservative Weekly Standard summarized in hits headline: Ex-Aide Says Ron Paul Is a 9/11 Truther & Isolationist Who Thinks U.S. Shouldn't Have Fought Hitler.
In his 2,100-word piece, posted at RightwingNews.com, Dondero says he held several campaign and Capitol Hill posts with Paul from 1987 to 2003. At his own website, LibertarianRepublican.net, he said he was revealing much of the information for the first time. Much of what I have to say will not please the liberal media hacks. Though, the Ron Paul diehards will find much objectionable, as well, Dondero wrote.
http://news.yahoo.com/ex-aide-ron-paul-foreign-policy-sheer-lunacy-144730256.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
106 replies, 14414 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (51)
ReplyReply to this post
106 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nah, I know he thinks ideologically that Laissez-faire doesn't mean crony-capitalism...
joshcryer
Dec 2011
#73
While your first paragraph may be true, but Ron Paul does not see it that way
Bjorn Against
Dec 2011
#75
Would you have supported Pat Buchanan for president because of his foreign policy?
frazzled
Dec 2011
#90
Not to mention he thinks gay people deliberately spread AIDS to straight people. nt
TheWraith
Dec 2011
#7
Ron Paul is the poster boy for crony-capitalism. Anyone who says otherwise...
joshcryer
Dec 2011
#15
Many liberals overlook his stance on voting/civil rights, which again proves that Melissa
Liberal_Stalwart71
Dec 2011
#21
And nowhere in the modern world has Austrian economics actually worked. No way, no how. n/t
Liberal_Stalwart71
Dec 2011
#20
And not once has Greenwald said that any of his anti-democratic record is irrelevant.
Luminous Animal
Dec 2011
#29
I'm looking for the stat on young voters in your link and I don't see them.
Luminous Animal
Dec 2011
#42
What is the point of cherry picking a random paragraph from a four month old article on how the
Puregonzo1188
Dec 2011
#11
He's not "holding up" anyone. He is making a clear factual observation of
Luminous Animal
Dec 2011
#32
If you believe ANY REPUBLICAN would have pulled out of Iraq, you're fucking nuts.
TheWraith
Dec 2011
#61
Wow, out of the entire article Ron Paul is mentioned in a single sentence.
Puregonzo1188
Dec 2011
#35
You've read my posts. And your OP never mentions Ron Paul is a lunatic racist.
Puregonzo1188
Dec 2011
#69
He's never claimed that Paul is anti-war and he has not bought into Paul's bullshit.
Luminous Animal
Dec 2011
#36
I think some who support Paul seem to want to forget those inconvenient little truths.
Jennicut
Dec 2011
#96
I agree, that is a good article by Greenwald and I would highly recommend for anyone to click
Uncle Joe
Dec 2011
#92