Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
87. It's also kind of funny when someone who has been here a week has all the "usual suspects" mapped
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 01:10 PM
Feb 2016

Almost makes you think they are a repeat customer.

It's like those transcripts. Proles need not know. tk2kewl Feb 2016 #1
The Hillary Goldman transcripts were the first things to come to my mind, too! valerief Feb 2016 #3
Attack on labeling is part of a global attack on local sourcing and labeling in trade 'agreements' Baobab Feb 2016 #20
Excellent point AxionExcel Feb 2016 #35
They are doing it with people too Baobab Feb 2016 #37
Because consumers are stupid Recursion Feb 2016 #2
Wow. How tremendously arrogant. marmar Feb 2016 #4
That is arrogant of stupid consumers, I agree Recursion Feb 2016 #5
I support the public's right to know. marmar Feb 2016 #6
Fair enough. I have nothing against mandating labelling of GMOs Recursion Feb 2016 #10
Look at other issues. Igel Feb 2016 #13
There already is such a label (albeit voluntary, as far as I know) MH1 Feb 2016 #82
Does the public have the right to know which foods were produced through radiation and chemical... Humanist_Activist Feb 2016 #21
Food Babe says we shouldn't eat things with chemicals. Liberal Veteran Feb 2016 #12
Sunlight? Sunlight is radiation! You definitely don't want to petronius Feb 2016 #38
Food Babe sure looks healthy too womanofthehills Feb 2016 #60
That's not an argument, most organic food shoppers are upper class by default because the foods... Humanist_Activist Feb 2016 #70
So, it's OK to parrot Trump-Republican talking points on DU? AxionExcel Feb 2016 #34
On the face of it labeling makes sense. Turbineguy Feb 2016 #7
Are you really sure you don't eat round up? tk2kewl Feb 2016 #8
Secrecy is a hallmark of the GMO-Chem Industry, of Republicans, and of evil AxionExcel Feb 2016 #9
And if they had labels: "If GM foods are safe, why are they required to be labeled?" Liberal Veteran Feb 2016 #11
As it stands today, most GMO crops have only one advantage: glyphosate resistant AxionExcel Feb 2016 #14
It is still bad logic. Liberal Veteran Feb 2016 #17
To be honest I'd rather eat Roundup than pig shit, which I've heard organic farms use... Humanist_Activist Feb 2016 #22
Well, i've heard stuff, too. Want me to share my rumors? AxionExcel Feb 2016 #26
So you think people who have died from shit fertilized produce are untrue rumors? Major Nikon Feb 2016 #47
Having been poisoned by pesticides womanofthehills Feb 2016 #55
Really, which pesticides? Its not like organic farming is pesticide free... Humanist_Activist Feb 2016 #58
Here is a fact check of your link above womanofthehills Feb 2016 #61
Interesting, in the first claim, he gets a fact wrong... Humanist_Activist Feb 2016 #66
Not true, there are a number of advantages Major Nikon Feb 2016 #44
Obama supported labeling before he didn't nationalize the fed Feb 2016 #15
Why industry opposition? The prospect of falling market share. closeupready Feb 2016 #16
Key words here: Archae Feb 2016 #18
What an amazingly perfect, TrueGMObeliever antifactual inversion of reality. AxionExcel Feb 2016 #27
Actual factual reality? Major Nikon Feb 2016 #45
There is difference in taste. Most of the small farmers will use Jim Beard Feb 2016 #36
Except nowadays the "small farmer" you mention only exists in third world countries. Archae Feb 2016 #39
Just curious womanofthehills Feb 2016 #54
And guess what turkeys do on those plants. Archae Feb 2016 #56
I have been eating those raspberries forever womanofthehills Feb 2016 #62
Lots of 3rd world countries have life expectancies similar to the US Major Nikon Feb 2016 #72
I'm not sure what those advantages are Major Nikon Feb 2016 #46
There are several things that use the Organic umbrella Jim Beard Feb 2016 #49
I'm not seeing the advantage Major Nikon Feb 2016 #51
Also less pesticide runnoff womanofthehills Feb 2016 #65
"Organic is nothing BUT marketing". Deadshot Feb 2016 #53
I noticed all you people who hate organic womanofthehills Feb 2016 #63
We don't "hate organic." Archae Feb 2016 #64
... Major Nikon Feb 2016 #89
Why the attack on labeling? Trade rules-Links to info and my thoughts on the main issues Baobab Feb 2016 #19
Here's the problem with using political rather than objective criteria Major Nikon Feb 2016 #48
It's funny that we have our own anti-science people on the left. Deadshot Feb 2016 #23
Monsanto is a boogeyman for the left, hell some of the conspiracy theories revolving around the Zika Humanist_Activist Feb 2016 #25
Pioneer Seeds, a long established good corn seed company was bought by DuPont Jim Beard Feb 2016 #32
just google "monsanto poisons town" nt killbotfactory Feb 2016 #33
Workers File Lawsuit Against Monsanto Alleging Chemicals Caused Cancer womanofthehills Feb 2016 #57
From America's best lawyer Mike Papantonio network womanofthehills Feb 2016 #59
First off, Links? Second off, where is the evidence for all these assertions? Humanist_Activist Feb 2016 #67
Are you kidding? GMO's and Roundup are blamed in anti-GMO propaganda for everything. Archae Feb 2016 #68
While also failing to demonstrate that organic pesticides and herbicides are safer, as claimed... Humanist_Activist Feb 2016 #69
Like I said before, propaganda. Archae Feb 2016 #71
GMOs are responsible for my power steering leak. Orrex Feb 2016 #76
People also used to laugh at the hypothesis that Rock-n-Roll caused devil worship Major Nikon Feb 2016 #79
US postage rates have been linked to global warming and the evidence is pretty convincing Major Nikon Feb 2016 #77
The opposition is simple, GMO is too general a term, what type of GMO should be labeled? Humanist_Activist Feb 2016 #24
Not only that, but it would be largely useless Warpy Feb 2016 #29
64 other countries in the world have no problem with informing their citizens nationalize the fed Feb 2016 #40
Blue Corn is Non GMO Jim Beard Feb 2016 #42
Almost none of the unprocessed corn you buy in the market is GMO Major Nikon Feb 2016 #52
In other words, 135 countries think that the complaint is silly. Got it. Orrex Feb 2016 #74
Maybe we could start our own grocery store chain Jim Beard Feb 2016 #28
Or you could buy a farm and grow your own. Warpy Feb 2016 #30
they'd be friggin' running ads 24/7, flying banners over beaches and fireworks at night MisterP Feb 2016 #31
Just how many food processors are there Jim Beard Feb 2016 #41
I don't think the number of them is the problem Major Nikon Feb 2016 #50
So this is a fight between organic companies and chemical companies? Rex Feb 2016 #43
No. That's one way the industrial chemical-GMO-pharmaceutical-ag Corps frame it AxionExcel Feb 2016 #75
It would be pretty fucking stupid if that were the case Major Nikon Feb 2016 #81
Agreed. It is pretty freaking stupid. And evil, if you ask me. AxionExcel Feb 2016 #83
So who do you think is buying off the AMA and the NSA? Major Nikon Feb 2016 #86
So-called "organic" food producers use chemicals much worse than glyphosate Orrex Feb 2016 #73
Rest easy, Orrex. There are plenty of digital minions emitting those phony whines about organics AxionExcel Feb 2016 #80
"Clean food." That's funny, what you wrote. Orrex Feb 2016 #85
It's also kind of funny when someone who has been here a week has all the "usual suspects" mapped Major Nikon Feb 2016 #87
Library Girl? Archae Feb 2016 #90
... Major Nikon Feb 2016 #91
SpiralHawk Major Nikon Apr 2016 #92
Label them. I do not want GMO's in my food supply from a chemical company bkkyosemite Feb 2016 #78
They are not required to list the poisons in household cleaners, either. Zorra Feb 2016 #84
I'd be interested to know if you could name just one that doesn't Major Nikon Feb 2016 #88
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"If GM foods are saf...»Reply #87