Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 68,000 jobs ADDED, not 750,000 jobs LOST. [View all]sweetapogee
(1,168 posts)49. Basically
are you saying that the economy is out of the shrub shit-can and Obama can run on a prosperity ticket?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Net positive CREATION is negative? We're not beating churn but POSITIVE is the correct direction
uponit7771
Jun 2012
#7
If it takes 150,000 new jobs *each* month to maintain equilibrium, how is 68,000 good?
Roland99
Jun 2012
#12
I'll agree 68,000 new jobs is better than an actual negative number but you're missing the point.
Roland99
Jun 2012
#14
Additionally that 150K needed is an average, so let's consider which months there are graduates
Lionessa
Jun 2012
#21
Actually, on a technical note, I believe the .1% uptick in the UE rate was due to people re-entering
coalition_unwilling
Jun 2012
#51
Unfortunately unless the admin stops doing the same things and expecting different results,
Lionessa
Jun 2012
#22
i stopped listening to or believing the numbers since bushco. they would put out a number for the
seabeyond
Jun 2012
#9
There are constraints, but we are not close to hitting those constraints.
girl gone mad
Jun 2012
#37
Oh, please, grow up. Last month's 115K was revised to 77K, so how low do you think that 69K
Lionessa
Jun 2012
#19
Labor shows 13,000 government jobs were cut in May - for the 10th straight month.
sad sally
Jun 2012
#47
These are the prices manufacturers are getting for their products, nothing to do with gas.
Cronkite
Jun 2012
#43
Not everywhere. Here in western Washington state we paid $4.27 (regular) yesterday.
sad sally
Jun 2012
#48
I know of no other way to explain this to you (others have tried, as well) although I made it simple
Roland99
Jun 2012
#31
It's a dead cat bounce is what it is. Yeah positive 68,000 is better than
coalition_unwilling
Jun 2012
#50