Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sweetapogee

(1,168 posts)
49. Basically
Fri Jun 1, 2012, 11:38 PM
Jun 2012

are you saying that the economy is out of the shrub shit-can and Obama can run on a prosperity ticket?

As is explained every single month, Pale Blue Dot Jun 2012 #1
ADDED as opposed to LOST. Atman Jun 2012 #3
Did you read what I wrote? Pale Blue Dot Jun 2012 #4
Net positive CREATION is negative? We're not beating churn but POSITIVE is the correct direction uponit7771 Jun 2012 #7
If it takes 150,000 new jobs *each* month to maintain equilibrium, how is 68,000 good? Roland99 Jun 2012 #12
No, Roland...you're starting from a different place. Atman Jun 2012 #13
I'll agree 68,000 new jobs is better than an actual negative number but you're missing the point. Roland99 Jun 2012 #14
and, look at the trend downward now (March and April were revised down, too) Roland99 Jun 2012 #15
How can this be explained any simpler? girl gone mad Jun 2012 #36
Of course I read what you wrote, and you are wrong. Atman Jun 2012 #8
Meaning 582,000 people are being teased this month. caseymoz Jun 2012 #25
I think you're totally correct...there is a tease factor. Atman Jun 2012 #27
Additionally that 150K needed is an average, so let's consider which months there are graduates Lionessa Jun 2012 #21
Actually, on a technical note, I believe the .1% uptick in the UE rate was due to people re-entering coalition_unwilling Jun 2012 #51
Actually 240,000 enter the workforce per month caseymoz Jun 2012 #24
PBD, Phone Home! Demeter Jun 2012 #32
true, but we can't just whistle in the dark,either. WI_DEM Jun 2012 #2
we still have june qazplm Jun 2012 #6
Unfortunately unless the admin stops doing the same things and expecting different results, Lionessa Jun 2012 #22
DU rec...nt SidDithers Jun 2012 #5
i stopped listening to or believing the numbers since bushco. they would put out a number for the seabeyond Jun 2012 #9
That trend actually started long before *. hughee99 Jun 2012 #40
the liberal media m$nbc is pounding on the negative...doncha love 'em spanone Jun 2012 #10
...which ignores that there just might be some constraints to real growth bhikkhu Jun 2012 #16
There are constraints, but we are not close to hitting those constraints. girl gone mad Jun 2012 #37
depends on where you live madrchsod Jun 2012 #11
And O is ahead by 1 for June. Woody Woodpecker Jun 2012 #17
I love the fact that Obama is going to get blamed...NOT YellowRubberDuckie Jun 2012 #18
Oh, please, grow up. Last month's 115K was revised to 77K, so how low do you think that 69K Lionessa Jun 2012 #19
It includes public and private, but cthulu2016 Jun 2012 #20
"Grow up" yourself. You missed the point entirely... Atman Jun 2012 #26
+1 Dawson Leery Jun 2012 #28
Labor shows 13,000 government jobs were cut in May - for the 10th straight month. sad sally Jun 2012 #47
It isn't just jobs....... Cronkite Jun 2012 #23
but gas prices are down. okieinpain Jun 2012 #41
These are the prices manufacturers are getting for their products, nothing to do with gas. Cronkite Jun 2012 #43
all true, but gas perices are okieinpain Jun 2012 #45
Not everywhere. Here in western Washington state we paid $4.27 (regular) yesterday. sad sally Jun 2012 #48
Here's a very simple analogy as to why this is a "negative" number >>>> Roland99 Jun 2012 #29
Sorry, Roland. You're an outlier. Atman Jun 2012 #30
I know of no other way to explain this to you (others have tried, as well) although I made it simple Roland99 Jun 2012 #31
"You're an outlier." You atman, could not be more wrong just1voice Jun 2012 #35
Stop and take some deep breaths. girl gone mad Jun 2012 #38
Change item #3 to -750,000 and recalculate the "hole". JoePhilly Jun 2012 #33
I already did in my note at the bottom of my post. Roland99 Jun 2012 #34
Just keep swinging, your bound to hit something eventually. Egalitarian Thug Jun 2012 #39
You really need to get into the "weeds" of those numbers. KoKo Jun 2012 #42
Did we LOSE 750,000 jobs last month? Atman Jun 2012 #44
Let's try this one more time. Pale Blue Dot Jun 2012 #46
Basically sweetapogee Jun 2012 #49
It's a dead cat bounce is what it is. Yeah positive 68,000 is better than coalition_unwilling Jun 2012 #50
I have a question moose65 Jun 2012 #52
Thats a damn good question SGMRTDARMY Jun 2012 #53
There was a very dramatic spike in job seekers aint_no_life_nowhere Jun 2012 #54
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»68,000 jobs ADDED, not 75...»Reply #49