Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Official Vote Tally on Ohio's Pot Issue Deemed "Statistically Impossible" [View all]Botany
(70,585 posts)8. many of our elections are way dirty .... end of story
http://www.kansas.com/opinion/opn-columns-blogs/article32685087.html
and Ohio has "a history" of this crap
screen captures from Ohio's Sec. of State web site in 2004 Cincinnati and Toledo
and Ohio has "a history" of this crap
screen captures from Ohio's Sec. of State web site in 2004 Cincinnati and Toledo
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Official Vote Tally on Ohio's Pot Issue Deemed "Statistically Impossible" [View all]
HomerRamone
Nov 2015
OP
That is a typical sample size and it had a margin of error of less than 5%. So it makes no sense
pnwmom
Nov 2015
#60
While I'm fine with the way it turned out, I welcome any investigation into Ohio voting.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Nov 2015
#5
Sounds great! Better, come up with a system not relying on the cheaters' cooperation, like a site
GoneFishin
Nov 2015
#25
People, including those here, are SO eager to discredit poll after poll year after year
HomerRamone
Nov 2015
#9
that second to last paragraph explains it all. They should really save those tricks for bigger
yurbud
Nov 2015
#26
So it's true in Ohio, but not in Kentucky? Polls do, errrr, do not, em, ...lie, except????
Ford_Prefect
Nov 2015
#31