Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
54. that looks like a ATF form 4473 question
Mon Jun 22, 2015, 02:38 PM
Jun 2015
11 b. Are you under indictment or information in any court for a felony, or any other crime, for which the judge could imprison you for
more than one year? (See Instructions for Question 11.b.)


I certify that my answers to Section A are true, correct, and complete. I have read and understand the Notices, Instructions,
and Definitions on ATF Form 4473. I understand that answering “yes” to question 11.a. if I am not the actual buyer is a crime punishable as a felony under Federal law, and may also violate State and/or local law. I understand that a person who answers “yes” to any of the questions 11.b. through 11.k. is prohibited from purchasing or receiving a firearm. I understand that a person who answers “yes” to question 11.l. is prohibited from purchasing or receiving a firearm, unless the person also answers “Yes” to question 12. I also understand that making any false oral or written statement, or exhibiting any false or misrepresented identification with respect to this transaction, is a crime punish able as a felony under Federal law, and may also violate State and/or local law. I further understand that the repetitive purchase of firearms for the purpose of resale for livelihood and profit without a Federal firearms license is a violation of law
(See Instructions for Question 16)


Sounds like he may have lied on his ATF from 4473. As the OP has an FFL, they should know that the sale should not have been completed under existing law and the buyer should be up and prosecuted for a federal offense.
How would you do that? MineralMan Jun 2015 #1
If they can find their on-line stuff so quickly after the fact, why not before the fact? -none Jun 2015 #17
Employers do it daily.nt flamin lib Jun 2015 #18
With the permission of the applicant. MineralMan Jun 2015 #20
With permission? Really? nt. flamin lib Jun 2015 #22
Actually, yes. Applicants are asked for information MineralMan Jun 2015 #23
OK. I can live with that. Refuse and you don't get a gun. n flamin lib Jun 2015 #24
This is not happening. MineralMan Jun 2015 #25
Hey, you don't fill out the the NICS form you don't get a gun. Don't give up flamin lib Jun 2015 #26
I'm in favor of May Issue... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2015 #62
May would be busy month Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #64
May be discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2015 #65
Got me there! Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #68
what about those of us who refuse to fall for Facebook garbage? Skittles Jun 2015 #33
I once had a Facebook page Art_from_Ark Jun 2015 #71
heh Skittles Jun 2015 #73
If I need to keep up with friends and family, Art_from_Ark Jun 2015 #74
which is no problem if the person is worth it Skittles Jun 2015 #77
It's kind of funny Art_from_Ark Jun 2015 #78
my opinion of people who resist the Facebook borg is GREATLY enhanced Skittles Jun 2015 #79
Should be easy HassleCat Jun 2015 #53
"How would you do that?" Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #69
Yeah, no. Brickbat Jun 2015 #2
Question 32) "do you have a facebook account and what is your password?" lumberjack_jeff Jun 2015 #3
More like: MineralMan Jun 2015 #4
"The internet? What's that?" n/t lumberjack_jeff Jun 2015 #5
"By signing this form, you agree that all information supplied is accurate and truthful. MineralMan Jun 2015 #6
Good point. That would effectively give guns to only those with ill intent. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2015 #11
How would Democratic Underground posters rate? n/t Evergreen Emerald Jun 2015 #7
Is talk of "torches and pitchforks" seditious? NT 1939 Jun 2015 #12
Lol Evergreen Emerald Jun 2015 #13
Some wouldn't do so well sarisataka Jun 2015 #16
Some of the usual suspects would fare pretty poorly. nt flamin lib Jun 2015 #21
So the FBI would keep files on every US resident's internet posts? aikoaiko Jun 2015 #8
Fortunately, they're way ahead of you in this regard. Orrex Jun 2015 #10
Well, it's a better idea than an AWB Recursion Jun 2015 #9
I am sure you have a plan Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #14
Ask any employer. nt flamin lib Jun 2015 #19
Excellent idea, how would it work??? ileus Jun 2015 #15
Who decides? You? What legal standard would you apply? X_Digger Jun 2015 #27
Damn, I thought I had you on ignore. flamin lib Jun 2015 #28
Lol, sure you did. I'll be sure to remind you of the power you'd grant police the next time you.. X_Digger Jun 2015 #34
I organized for Occupy L.A. & it's on Facebook. Do I get a gun...your highness? U4ikLefty Jun 2015 #29
Do you advocate the death of anyone? If so, no gun. nt flamin lib Jun 2015 #30
Not letting you off the hook. The gov't thinks I'm a "threat" (Occupy L.A.), shoud they disallow my U4ikLefty Jun 2015 #31
Are you a threat or can anything you posted to facebook be interpreted as flamin lib Jun 2015 #35
You moved the goalposts & now you're just rambling nonsense. U4ikLefty Jun 2015 #38
What????? flamin lib Jun 2015 #39
you (probably inadvertently) pointed out the issue melm00se Jun 2015 #52
that looks like a ATF form 4473 question Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #54
Welcome to the world of Minority Report. Panich52 Jun 2015 #32
Yeah you're right. Guns for everyone. No qualifications, no checks. Post on social media your flamin lib Jun 2015 #36
Obvious fanatacism cuts both ways. Firearms will not be eliminated. Background checks are law. Panich52 Jun 2015 #37
Funny, have to go run to the safe haven Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #40
Off comes the mask. beevul Jun 2015 #41
Kind of eye opening Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #42
You never know. Double down tendencies run deep. beevul Jun 2015 #43
Very true, I love seeing pretzels Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #48
Not running anywhere. flamin lib Jun 2015 #44
Personally, I DON'T think Roof had that right. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #46
Seems to be the case Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #50
seems to me Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #47
I did say it. nt flamin lib Jun 2015 #49
link? nt Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #51
Don't read well? flamin lib Jun 2015 #57
Just as I thought Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #60
This message was self-deleted by its author Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #45
I suppose as long as I can still get out in 10 minutes it's not that bad. ileus Jun 2015 #55
So, if you wanted to scuttle somebody's life, how hard would making a fake page in their name be? Freelancer Jun 2015 #56
No on all 4 points. flamin lib Jun 2015 #58
Respectfully disagree completely nt Freelancer Jun 2015 #59
"may issue" Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #61
proof please or link as you are so prone to say. flamin lib Jun 2015 #70
OK, I will play Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #75
Really? That's all ya got? flamin lib Jun 2015 #80
Tip of the iceberg Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #82
So are you going to apologize now? Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #76
No,and it is still entertaining to see the depth to which gunners will go flamin lib Jun 2015 #81
Typical, and again with the dishonesty Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #83
Telling an untruth (i.e., lying) online on social media is not perjury. Thus, closeupready Jun 2015 #63
you bad "GUNNER" you Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #66
Well said! nt Freelancer Jun 2015 #67
I remember this scene -- Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #72
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It is time to add social ...»Reply #54