Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
139. BTW, the President doesn't declare war. Congress does, then the President acts as CIC.
Sun Jun 21, 2015, 08:57 AM
Jun 2015

The AUMF for which Hillary voted and Bernie did not, gave Bush discretion---way too much obviously. But, once he was giving that discretion the funding HAD to be there or the troops would have suffered. Remember, they did not even have armored vehicles. Cheney said something like, you go to war with the army you have, not the army you'd like. The troops were using tinfoil, ffs.

Please do not imagine, or expect us Bush would not have sent the troops to Iraq under the authority of the AUMF, no matter what, and then held up Congress for funding, knowing they'd have to provide it.

Funny that the only ones TM99 Jun 2015 #1
Meant to put reply #2 here. nt ucrdem Jun 2015 #3
Please. Are you seriously trying to condemn Sanders for a no vote on THIS Head Start bill? marym625 Jun 2015 #57
It was a $35 billion funding bill. What would have happened if it hadn't passed? ucrdem Jun 2015 #72
A better outcome would have been no messing with a program that worked marym625 Jun 2015 #100
Good post. Cant believe how far some others here hafta stretch to supposedly find fault with Bernie, when there is none. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2015 #207
Thank you! marym625 Jun 2015 #212
Yes. The utter desperation is tragic, but kind of amusing at the same time. Zorra Jun 2015 #276
Had me laughing earlier. It also gives me confidence Bernie might just pull this thing off... InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2015 #329
Bravo Bryce Butler Jun 2015 #5
I give it a PG for pretzel google. ucrdem Jun 2015 #6
Almost every House Democrat voted against the Head Start bill your OP cited, as the pie chart at merrily Jun 2015 #7
Of course, it is a smear job. TM99 Jun 2015 #10
Funding Head Start bad, funding Iraq war good? Because that's how his votes sort out. nt ucrdem Jun 2015 #13
Violating Separation of Church and State in Head Start BAD, Iraq war INFINITELY WORSE. merrily Jun 2015 #17
He voted to fund that war, also Homeland Security. nt ucrdem Jun 2015 #26
I already responding to your funding comment. BTW, how did Hillary vote on those things? merrily Jun 2015 #28
There is something vile in using the IDEA in this manner Fairgo Jun 2015 #78
It was a bad thing, but Sanders was not able to thwart it. It passed the House, but never came to a merrily Jun 2015 #89
Thanks for verifying the banal sophistry... Fairgo Jun 2015 #143
Banal sophistry and cheap smears are the lozocolo way. QC Jun 2015 #182
Too bad they didn't get his sock drawer. Rex Jun 2015 #317
I'm not sure what's the point of banning disruptors QC Jun 2015 #323
Thanks for verifying the banal sophistry... Fairgo Jun 2015 #145
Not really Mnpaul Jun 2015 #175
unbelievable! marym625 Jun 2015 #201
The fact is that he voted to fund the DoD, imminent war and all, and Homeland Security. ucrdem Jun 2015 #208
Nice that you skip the things I mentioned but I don't find it surprising considering the OP. marym625 Jun 2015 #217
The fact is that you're avoiding the difficult questions. I don't blame you. nt ucrdem Jun 2015 #227
Bullshit. it is you that are avoiding. I asked a question. YOU didn't answer marym625 Jun 2015 #228
Look I have no idea what particular question you're harping on. Sorry. nt ucrdem Jun 2015 #230
Wow. marym625 Jun 2015 #233
Sanders voted against a $35 billion Head Start bill and for funding the Iraq War. ucrdem Jun 2015 #11
OMG. An even more shameful reply. He voted AGAINST the war. Once those who ADVOCATED for it, merrily Jun 2015 #19
He voted to fund it on the same day he voted against the mainly symbolic AUMF. ucrdem Jun 2015 #24
The Iraq War AUMF was symbolic? OMG merrily Jun 2015 #68
Symbolic? TM99 Jun 2015 #75
Without the Defense funding the Iraq war wouldn't have happened. Sanders voted to fund it. nt ucrdem Jun 2015 #97
Yeah, now that Bush has his war on TM99 Jun 2015 #109
Sanders voted to fund it the same day as AUMF, five months before Bush declared war. ucrdem Jun 2015 #112
Are you obtuse? TM99 Jun 2015 #120
Linking 2003 funding to a 2003 war approved the same day and declared five months later? ucrdem Jun 2015 #125
I guess you are! TM99 Jun 2015 #126
IRRELEVANT. Funding a war for which Congress voted is the ONLY decent thing to do. Again, ask Kerry merrily Jun 2015 #135
Holy cow, 5100 posts in the last 90 days...wow you are busy Sheepshank Jun 2015 #270
Did you have a point to make? merrily Jun 2015 #287
I made my point for those cared to read....apparently that wasn't what you'd read Sheepshank Jun 2015 #313
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2015 #324
That is very true, sometimes people get stuck in their snarking rather than forwarding the uppityperson Jun 2015 #326
You just keep saying the same stupid things over and over pangaia Jun 2015 #189
Because Bush and Cheney wouldn't have sent the troops anyway? mythology Jun 2015 #140
The DoD funding bill was not just for war. TM99 Jun 2015 #148
And this bilious thread is on you. AGAIN, how did Hillary vote? merrily Jun 2015 #50
indeed! secondwind Jun 2015 #48
So in other words, TM99 Jun 2015 #9
In other words, his voting record speaks volumes. nt ucrdem Jun 2015 #15
Yep. His voting record does speak volumes. Thank heaven it does, so it stands up to smears. merrily Jun 2015 #22
I wonder where it came from, don't you? merrily Jun 2015 #25
The links are in the OP. ucrdem Jun 2015 #27
No shit. I obviously knew that, given my replies. You might try reading a post before you reply. merrily Jun 2015 #29
From HRC's hard-working, UNPAID interns per chance? Divernan Jun 2015 #88
Well, I am not leaping to the conclusion that the OP actually checked 24 years of Bernie's votes, merrily Jun 2015 #96
It's a Loco thing. Just crazy, they got nothing else. Edited to thank the jury. Autumn Jun 2015 #178
Hmm. A post of mine on this thread got alerted on as well. Same vote, too: 0-7 to leave. Bad alerts. merrily Jun 2015 #282
Yeah strange. The consequences of a 0-7 to leave is that the Autumn Jun 2015 #288
I don't know if that's enough. Some of the alerts I've seen, especially lately, have been merrily Jun 2015 #293
The admins see all the alerts so if that's going on I would think Autumn Jun 2015 #294
One would hope. merrily Jun 2015 #297
Yes, bravo. Sienna86 Jun 2015 #8
Well now, that's how one answers a question! Nice! n/t jtuck004 Jun 2015 #12
Yup yup, knocked that one outta the park...kiss it goodbye...it's a Grand Slam!... InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2015 #331
Actually it's his ideas that need the support. But yeah, he's the only choice out there jtuck004 Jun 2015 #333
Yes, I see your point, but this is a WAY different political climate. Times have changed a lot since the early 80's. It's our time now. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2015 #339
Understand, I heard the same story back then. Really nothing new, though I know many can't see that. jtuck004 Jun 2015 #341
Fair point, I see where you're coming from. Yes, we'll see. And we saw what the media did to Howard Dean more recently, so obviously, anything csn happen. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2015 #357
As soon as I seen the subject line madokie Jun 2015 #30
Bravo! JustAnotherGen Jun 2015 #37
Glad you did this!! I was going to do the research myself... n/1 secondwind Jun 2015 #46
Great work and great rebuttal to the OP's selective thinking Ichingcarpenter Jun 2015 #51
Thanks TM99 zentrum Jun 2015 #92
++++++++++1,000 - The OP is SHREDDED and left destroyed with this post. Bonobo Jun 2015 #206
It is food for thought though treestar Jun 2015 #218
Well said! ChairmanAgnostic Jun 2015 #248
I figured it wouldn't take long for some kind soul SusanCalvin Jun 2015 #252
I am afraid I have to disagree with your conclusion. MADem Jun 2015 #321
So are you back for another tumble TM99 Jun 2015 #356
What does that even mean..."So you are back for another tumble with me?" MADem Jun 2015 #359
You always claim that Clinton suffers the same. TM99 Jun 2015 #360
She does, but you refuse to see it. You only cry out when your ox is gored. MADem Jun 2015 #362
That right there is the biggest pile TM99 Jun 2015 #364
You and your "steaming pile" can go have a nice day. MADem Jun 2015 #365
Purpose of the Head Start bill, from the bill text: ucrdem Jun 2015 #2
Couple of things merrily Jun 2015 #4
So you support John Boehner nt Depaysement Jun 2015 #164
this tactic will backfire Motown_Johnny Jun 2015 #14
I never expect perfection from anyone. MoonRiver Jun 2015 #16
As far as I am concerned, religious doesn't applied to Sanders' campaign and he's becoming strongest TRoN33 Jun 2015 #20
Have you ever heard the word analogy? MoonRiver Jun 2015 #21
Have you been reading the replies to this thread? HE VOTED WITH THE DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS. merrily Jun 2015 #31
But , but I've been hearing here that he's the one who will vote his principles MoonRiver Jun 2015 #47
Again, READ. merrily Jun 2015 #53
I read, and I'm not impressed with his votes on these issues. MoonRiver Jun 2015 #73
LMAO. The Head Start bill never even came to a vote in the Senate. merrily Jun 2015 #77
So you agree with the GOP then? TM99 Jun 2015 #81
Ucrdem nice politically bait. These bill of rights are still fresh in my mind and it's filled with.. TRoN33 Jun 2015 #18
Possibly but the Homeland Security and Defense Dept authorizations didn't? ucrdem Jun 2015 #23
Desperation reeks. Once war is declared, not funding would be heinous. Ask Kerry. And Hillary. merrily Jun 2015 #33
Voting to authorize funding it is tantamount to authorizing the war. ucrdem Jun 2015 #38
Like HELL. Dude, the hole you've been digging is way deep enough. Stop digging. merrily Jun 2015 #69
You can find these bills in the Congressional Record. leftofcool Jun 2015 #61
WARNING: Republican Flamebait OP Depaysement Jun 2015 #32
OP is perfectly accurate and speaking of accuracy ucrdem Jun 2015 #34
Not this tired shit again too. TM99 Jun 2015 #40
Nevertheless it is not accurate to call him a Democrat, and it's within his power to change that. ucrdem Jun 2015 #42
No one calls him a Democrat. TM99 Jun 2015 #49
The post I responded to calls him a Democrat. ucrdem Jun 2015 #54
He has changed it and the DNC agrees he's a Democrat. merrily Jun 2015 #173
No, they agree he's a "challenger." Big difference. ucrdem Jun 2015 #183
You understand that they mean challenging Hillary for the Dem Presidential nom, right? merrily Jun 2015 #193
I understand that you're claiming something that isn't true. ucrdem Jun 2015 #197
No, you're the one whose claims are not true. merrily Jun 2015 #231
Wrong. DNC already included Sanders as their quartet Chickaletta Jun 2015 #363
What's with the "republicon smear job" accusation when you're only posting his voting record? Cha Jun 2015 #43
That is NOT what the OP is doing Depaysement Jun 2015 #158
He's running for the Democratic Presidential nomination Depaysement Jun 2015 #44
No it isn't! Those ARE his votes! leftofcool Jun 2015 #66
Read the bill Depaysement Jun 2015 #150
So? Sponsors don't matter when we need things. leftofcool Jun 2015 #296
You don't get it Depaysement Jun 2015 #311
Correct! He is not a Democrat. leftofcool Jun 2015 #63
LOL, who are you and ucrdem to contradict the DNC on that point? merrily Jun 2015 #163
You got alerted on: cwydro Jun 2015 #199
Thanks. 0 to 7 to leave it. Thanks, Juror 7: "The most unwarranted alert I've seen." merrily Jun 2015 #226
Um, yes he is. The DNC immediately used his unofficial announcement to fund raise for itsself. merrily Jun 2015 #76
Yeah, the DNC may turn out to be sorry they did that! SusanCalvin Jun 2015 #254
I believe that as well. merrily Jun 2015 #265
"They've simply been treating Hillary as though she were an incumbent." SusanCalvin Jun 2015 #280
Which was about 42.5 seconds after he announced unofficially that he was running as a Democrat. merrily Jun 2015 #295
What about these voting bills is a smear? Are they true or not? leftofcool Jun 2015 #55
Read the fucking facts in the thread TM99 Jun 2015 #65
Bernie is NOT a Democrat! leftofcool Jun 2015 #67
He isn't third way either! Omaha Steve Jun 2015 #159
Take that up with Debbie Wasserman Schultz. The DNC thinks Bernie is a Democrat. merrily Jun 2015 #174
The DNC calls Sanders lots of nice things, ucrdem Jun 2015 #184
Yeah, right. The DNC is praising someone from another party to the skies and raising money off him merrily Jun 2015 #210
And never do they call Sanders a Democrat. Thanks for posting the evidence. nt ucrdem Jun 2015 #216
BECAUSE ANYONE WOULD REALIZE THAT FROM WHAT THEY DID SAY THAT THEY WERE WELCOMING A DEMOCRAT merrily Jun 2015 #221
They never call Sanders a Democrat because he isn't. nt ucrdem Jun 2015 #224
Please stop repeating yourself endlessly. I've already admitted I don't know how to help you merrily Jun 2015 #229
Here's how: Show where the DNC identifies Sanders as a Democrat. nt ucrdem Jun 2015 #234
I did. You apparently can't get that. And that inability of yours is what I cannot help you with. merrily Jun 2015 #238
They very clearly do NOT identify Sanders as a Dem in that email. nt ucrdem Jun 2015 #240
So you think having a D next to a name and voting for corporate interests makes a candidate a Dem? HooptieWagon Jun 2015 #186
Having a D does, yes. It's really not that complicated. nt ucrdem Jun 2015 #249
So having a D and supporting corporate interests HooptieWagon Jun 2015 #260
We care about more than that as Democrats. leftofcool Jun 2015 #298
Then why are the Hillary shills so desparate? HooptieWagon Jun 2015 #305
We are not worried. I think her poll number can attest to that. leftofcool Jun 2015 #308
When they start using the insult "shills".. they are the ones who are "desperate". Cha Jun 2015 #337
Yes this all seems so familiar. In fact the Guardian hearts guess who? ucrdem Jun 2015 #344
Aloha, ucr~ Cha Jun 2015 #368
That's really funny davidpdx Jun 2015 #345
+1 Marr Jun 2015 #255
Bravo Kalidurga Jun 2015 #35
Did Bernie vote against these things or not? leftofcool Jun 2015 #56
I see you. Kalidurga Jun 2015 #83
It's a good thing they're outing themselves early. HooptieWagon Jun 2015 #190
I have no problem with that. Kalidurga Jun 2015 #200
No answer I see. leftofcool Jun 2015 #299
Yep-- I thought I noticed a similarity myself. /nt Marr Jun 2015 #256
Death of credibility by OP, or political suttee is how it struck me Divernan Jun 2015 #59
Hillary supporters are losing credibility everyday. Kalidurga Jun 2015 #84
Mahalo for doing the research, ucr. We should know the record of history on all candidates.. Cha Jun 2015 #36
Thanks Cha! ucrdem Jun 2015 #39
Read reply #1 Cha. This isn't an honest OP. It is true, but not honest. Bernie voted the way most Ds peacebird Jun 2015 #52
It was a $35 billion Head Start funding bill. In the event, it passed. ucrdem Jun 2015 #62
Shit stirring is fine and well, but as reply #1 clearly showed Bernie voted along with most Dems peacebird Jun 2015 #80
Did you even look at how other Democrats voted? marym625 Jun 2015 #162
Only the House and only by 1 vote. In didn't come to a vote in the Senate. merrily Jun 2015 #176
He didn't do the research. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2015 #105
Nope. The bs smear job was provided to OP to distribute. HooptieWagon Jun 2015 #196
Oh? Please share your evidence. Surely you can back up such a baldly false claim? ucrdem Jun 2015 #202
You looked up 15 years of Bernies voting record? HooptieWagon Jun 2015 #211
Links are posted and your claim is laughably false. But in an endearing way. ucrdem Jun 2015 #215
So, you are in favor of Republican legislation? HooptieWagon Jun 2015 #220
So, walking back your false claim that the OP was provided to me? Can't blame you. ucrdem Jun 2015 #223
Were you just called a Hillary employee, ucrdem? sheshe2 Jun 2015 #338
Yes it's news to me but I can always use another job! ucrdem Jun 2015 #343
READER BEWARE OF THE INFO IN THE OP. merrily Jun 2015 #41
War hadn't been declared. The AUMF and funding votes were on the same day. nt ucrdem Jun 2015 #45
OMG. He voted against the war. It was declared. He voted for funding because voting NAY would have merrily Jun 2015 #64
The AUMF and funding votes were on October 10, 2002. Bush declared war on March 19, 2003. ucrdem Jun 2015 #85
We all know when the war started, which is what your link tells us. Also, your very own Reply 45 merrily Jun 2015 #108
AUMF and DoD funding votes were both on Oct 10, 2002. Bush declared war five months later. ucrdem Jun 2015 #119
What part of "irrelevant" did you not get? merrily Jun 2015 #122
PS, I'm guessing your subject line should read 2002 not 2012. merrily Jun 2015 #129
fixed it, thanks. nt ucrdem Jun 2015 #133
BTW, the President doesn't declare war. Congress does, then the President acts as CIC. merrily Jun 2015 #139
The fact is that Sanders voted up the money five months in advance of the bombs. ucrdem Jun 2015 #146
So you are anti-war and anti-military? TM99 Jun 2015 #152
He knew where the money was going because it was the same day as AUMF. nt ucrdem Jun 2015 #155
You did not answer the question. TM99 Jun 2015 #157
I'm guessing he knew where the money was going Mnpaul Jun 2015 #180
Your claims about the relation between war votes and funding votes are a total non starter. merrily Jun 2015 #154
Sorry, that's the way it went down. nt ucrdem Jun 2015 #156
Yep. 100% righteously on Bernie's part, but not on Hillary's. Please see my edit. merrily Jun 2015 #160
Thank you. This poster has clearly been exposed. Broward Jun 2015 #86
Not a problem. merrily Jun 2015 #104
You've really had your ass handed to you on this thread. That must hurt. Scuba Jun 2015 #58
I'm bookmarking this thread. Autumn Jun 2015 #214
Her supporters are showing the famous Hillary Clinton Family Values Katashi_itto Jun 2015 #334
Yeah but it's the Bernie supporters who are the problem Autumn Jun 2015 #335
Yes, those Bernie Supporters are Awful. Katashi_itto Jun 2015 #336
Makes me wonder what the Republican poison pills were Warpy Jun 2015 #60
Isn't it amazing! yallerdawg Jun 2015 #70
Thanks, I am now 100% behind Hillary because she has never voted in a way that could be taken out of corkhead Jun 2015 #71
Let's continue shall we? H.R.1036 -- Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act ucrdem Jun 2015 #74
Purpose: To protect manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or ammunition ucrdem Jun 2015 #79
This is the one that really gets to me. leftofcool Jun 2015 #95
Yes, I noticed that it's languishing on the vine. Can't say I'm surprised. ucrdem Jun 2015 #187
Ya know DonCoquixote Jun 2015 #82
Pile of caca de toro post. hobbit709 Jun 2015 #87
Too bad your Hillary logo doesn't have the blood of 1,000,000+ Iraqi KingCharlemagne Jun 2015 #90
excellent job by the responders to refute these ridiculous claims rurallib Jun 2015 #91
Nobody's refuting HR 1036 - Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms. Which is a problem. nt ucrdem Jun 2015 #93
you throw enough shit on the wall some sticks? rurallib Jun 2015 #94
You pretty much nailed it. hobbit709 Jun 2015 #101
All of it sticks because it is true. leftofcool Jun 2015 #102
I'm saying there are some votes Sanders' supporters don't seem to want to talk about. ucrdem Jun 2015 #103
Having listened to Sanders for years on the Hartmann show rurallib Jun 2015 #118
And Hillary supporters want to talk about all her votes? Really? merrily Jun 2015 #170
Unsubstantiated? The go in the Congressional Record. leftofcool Jun 2015 #99
Smear attempt debunked per usual. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2015 #98
Where is HR 1036 "debunked per usual"? ucrdem Jun 2015 #106
What, a bill that's not even in your OP? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2015 #111
It's in there, with a link to Sanders' vote. Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act: ucrdem Jun 2015 #113
I sit corrected. Only 90% of your OP has been debunked in comments so far. nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2015 #116
Unless it's been debunked 125% it doesn't count to the poster hobbit709 Jun 2015 #138
Actually, not even then. truebluegreen Jun 2015 #271
Anyone who was on DU in those days knows... ms liberty Jun 2015 #107
Okay thank you. Now how about HR 1036? ucrdem Jun 2015 #110
You got owned on this thread. TM99 Jun 2015 #114
Fine, refuse to discuss the rest of the OP. I don't blame you. nt ucrdem Jun 2015 #115
The rest of the OP was refuted in detail. hobbit709 Jun 2015 #117
Link? ucrdem Jun 2015 #120
Try reading the replies in your flamebait thread. hobbit709 Jun 2015 #123
Didn't think so. ucrdem Jun 2015 #131
I stand corrected. TM99 Jun 2015 #124
That's the one that gives immunity to arms manufacturers. ucrdem Jun 2015 #128
I don't have a problem with it. TM99 Jun 2015 #132
It sort of blows Sanders' liberal left cred to smithereens doesn't it? ucrdem Jun 2015 #136
So all liberals want to get rid of the 2nd Amendment? TM99 Jun 2015 #144
Not at all. He's ranked THE #1 most liberal Senator in the US Senate, even with those votes. merrily Jun 2015 #179
You keep forgetting to support your claims. nt ucrdem Jun 2015 #192
THIS OP & RESULTING DISCUSSION Blus4u Jun 2015 #149
Are you seriously lecturing TM99 Jun 2015 #153
Total desperation and now the convenient lie is, "gee everyone here likes to fight, because I say so." Rex Jun 2015 #320
This. Bobbie Jo Jun 2015 #169
How many times do you think you deserve a response-- really? Marr Jun 2015 #264
Lol. sheshe2 Jun 2015 #348
Gee, four identical OPs, same author, in GD. djean111 Jun 2015 #127
links? ucrdem Jun 2015 #130
Oh, I meant that this would show up in a search and easily linked to. Why four of these? djean111 Jun 2015 #134
Sorry but what four are you talking about? ucrdem Jun 2015 #137
If I click on latest threads, this thread shows up multiple times, with varying numbers of djean111 Jun 2015 #142
Hmm. That's not something I planned or intended. ucrdem Jun 2015 #147
I can't believe I wasted my life reading this thread titaniumsalute Jun 2015 #141
Oh, I thought it was quite educational Oilwellian Jun 2015 #167
It's a common theme. HooptieWagon Jun 2015 #204
2003 HR 2210...How did Sen Clinton Vote? fredamae Jun 2015 #151
It's a things if beauty watching the Hillary Camp try and try and try. morningfog Jun 2015 #161
You are correct. Bernie Sanders record is even better than most already know. marym625 Jun 2015 #165
and Thank you for posting that! SaranchaIsWaiting Jun 2015 #250
You are welcome marym625 Jun 2015 #251
Thank you Senator Sanders, then Congressman Sanders MuseRider Jun 2015 #166
+1000 marym625 Jun 2015 #177
I genuinely like the OP and understand his motivation... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #168
You beat me to it... Bobbie Jo Jun 2015 #171
People love to fight on this board. It is what it is./NT DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #172
True that. nt Bobbie Jo Jun 2015 #185
Just noting it. No sense trying to interrupt them.nt DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #188
This thread has been very illuminating. demmiblue Jun 2015 #181
Yep, to put out the truth about some guy with magic fairy dust. leftofcool Jun 2015 #300
More like lies covered with manure and flies davidpdx Jun 2015 #347
Ahhh...What lengths certain Katashi_itto Jun 2015 #191
K & R, good post, truths are sometimes hard to handle. Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #194
Thank you! ucrdem Jun 2015 #245
"I did not know voting records is a smear but to some maybe." SusanCalvin Jun 2015 #258
There is a limit on how much can be given, ergo the links was given. Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #279
Yeah, and as far as I can make out SusanCalvin Jun 2015 #286
Then be happy with Bernie's votes, what is with the smear post? Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #290
Are you saying *I* posted a smear? SusanCalvin Jun 2015 #306
No, you did bring in smear but it is in this thread. Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #309
Whatever. nt SusanCalvin Jun 2015 #312
He voted against Republican legislation. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #195
OP obviously supports Republican legislation. HooptieWagon Jun 2015 #267
Bernie obviously supports Republican legislation also. Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #284
OP posted he voted against it, along with Dem caucus. HooptieWagon Jun 2015 #301
That's it, I'm changing my vote to Hillary! Gregorian Jun 2015 #198
Nice try. FAIL! nt ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2015 #203
You know, that doesn't mean he's opposed to head start BainsBane Jun 2015 #205
Yes, I think we've covered Head Start. How about giving immunity to arms dealers ucrdem Jun 2015 #209
That is a clearly unacceptable vote BainsBane Jun 2015 #237
They won't answer that one. leftofcool Jun 2015 #302
With social media operatives this dishonest.... HooptieWagon Jun 2015 #213
Indeed. Are Hillary supporters hurting their candidate? nt Bonobo Jun 2015 #219
Enjoy your golden opportunity to bore us all day. ucrdem Jun 2015 #222
+1 Marr Jun 2015 #247
This OP and OP's resposes are totally pizza worthy imo. n/t PowerToThePeople Jun 2015 #225
My reposes are fine but thanks for the suggestion. nt ucrdem Jun 2015 #232
You're pizza worthy for saying that. MoonRiver Jun 2015 #235
You can't be serious? BainsBane Jun 2015 #239
Tos "do not be republican" PowerToThePeople Jun 2015 #241
You go ahead and take that up with Skinner BainsBane Jun 2015 #243
I will second that! nt sheshe2 Jun 2015 #349
Could not agree more. Marr Jun 2015 #246
Hillary supporters deserve pizza here? sheshe2 Jun 2015 #350
No, people stumping for Repuke bills deserve pizza. nt PowerToThePeople Jun 2015 #352
Not what happened... sheshe2 Jun 2015 #353
That is exactly what happened. n/t PowerToThePeople Jun 2015 #354
Oh, yeah it is-- your buddy changed his title and entire post after Marr Jun 2015 #358
I want to know how the OP TM99 Jun 2015 #361
Yeah, really-- what the hell? Marr Jun 2015 #366
I asked in ATA about missing edits yesterday. PowerToThePeople Jun 2015 #370
At least OP has outed themself as a dishonest corporatist shill. HooptieWagon Jun 2015 #266
^^^this^^^ L0oniX Jun 2015 #272
2-5 to LEAVE IT. L0oniX Jun 2015 #268
Thanks. PowerToThePeople Jun 2015 #275
I would have voted Leave It. HooptieWagon Jun 2015 #277
Desperate about sums it up. /nt Marr Jun 2015 #278
alert results grasswire Jun 2015 #283
#7 PowerToThePeople Jun 2015 #289
2003, wasn't that the year Bush got his war on, thanks to Hillary Clinton, in part? SaranchaIsWaiting Jun 2015 #236
LOL, Hillary supporters are getting really nervous. nt Logical Jun 2015 #242
Im a Hillary Supporter, but WTF? Adrahil Jun 2015 #244
Actually it is the small arms bill that is the problem. leftofcool Jun 2015 #307
You had to dig up stuff over a decade old? Betty Karlson Jun 2015 #253
and the stuff dug up actually proves Sanders to be a fighter for the people and against the GOP. marym625 Jun 2015 #257
There is that too. Betty Karlson Jun 2015 #259
Yes. OP is an epic fail. HooptieWagon Jun 2015 #262
OP Fail. Agschmid Jun 2015 #261
... whatchamacallit Jun 2015 #263
Jury results from an earlier alert, for those interested. nc4bo Jun 2015 #269
Thanks for posting that. ucrdem Jun 2015 #273
That was cowardly. Marr Jun 2015 #285
I love watching these dishonest OPs push away people they pretend to be trying to get on their side. Rex Jun 2015 #319
#4 got it right. HooptieWagon Jun 2015 #281
Are you saying Sanders voting record is dishonest? leftofcool Jun 2015 #303
Examples cited in OP, where Sanders voted with majority of Dems... HooptieWagon Jun 2015 #310
Epic and tragic fail. L0oniX Jun 2015 #274
How I long for an UNREC button - nt KingCharlemagne Jun 2015 #291
He represents his state well madville Jun 2015 #292
Really? That bill affected the entire country. leftofcool Jun 2015 #304
Groups were trying to sue gun manufacturers out of business madville Jun 2015 #325
Here's partial list of House Dems who voted to fund DOD like Sanders in the same Oct 10, 2002 vote Depaysement Jun 2015 #314
In 2003, Rep. Sanders voted AGAINST Head Start, AGAINST a jobs bill-- THE ORIGINAL POST hobbit709 Jun 2015 #315
Read the bill and look at the sponsors nt Depaysement Jun 2015 #316
Ah, I love watching a few 'dedicated' people push more and more folks into the Bernie camp! Rex Jun 2015 #318
Best example of Crash and Bern I've seen yet. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2015 #322
You left out the first AUMF authorization in 2001. Only Barbara Lee voted against in 2001: freshwest Jun 2015 #327
Holy wow, this onion has many layers! ucrdem Jun 2015 #342
I keep remembering a line: 'The world is not a nice place. And these are not nice people.' Speaking freshwest Jun 2015 #346
Jeez matt819 Jun 2015 #328
Sums up my feelings as well. Neither are perfect, but will gladly support the primary winner Elwood P Dowd Jun 2015 #330
Spot on ucrdem! William769 Jun 2015 #332
Thanks William! ucrdem Jun 2015 #340
I think it took me an hour to get thru the thread. sheshe2 Jun 2015 #351
Bottom line: Sanders has an F rating from the NRA and this is nowhere near advocating for a merrily Jun 2015 #355
Why doesn't this post show it's edit history? Marr Jun 2015 #367
The Hillary borg breached the space-time continuum and folded GD into a mojogon. ucrdem Jun 2015 #369
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In 2003, Rep. Sanders vot...»Reply #139