General Discussion

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)

27. Hides require that enough people actually vote to hide. The kids at the cool table

Sun Jun 7, 2015, 08:15 AM

Jun 2015

get a pass from their many friends.

And his sick posts after mass shootings are a matter of record.

I remember as do other DU'ers.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

184 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NYC_SKP appreciation thread [View all] Flying Squirrel Jun 2015 OP

He was one of the best DUers to be PPR'ed for calling Hillary a c---- Orrex Jun 2015 #1

What did the "it" in "c**ing st**nt" refer to? Bonobo Jun 2015 #2

I am a loss to understand it. I read it as shrewd stunt. But I guess there are a lot of LiberalArkie Jun 2015 #8

^^^this^^^ peacebird Jun 2015 #12

its disturbing that we are now inferring and banning people samsingh Jun 2015 #26

There's no "inferring" here. That charge is a red herring. Orrex Jun 2015 #100

You are sorely mistaken if you think the phrase, rather than whose activities it targeted Ms. Toad Jun 2015 #171

Yea, me too. I am just not smart enough to know all the sexual things that should be said or not be LiberalArkie Jun 2015 #137

Thank you Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #141

Google "Cunning Stunt" verbatim DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #69

Shrewd? Oh, come on. Orrex Jun 2015 #71

Never try to convince somebody to believe something when their whole world views hinges... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #76

Never say he used the "C" word when he indeed did not Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #81

RES IPSA LOQUITUR DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #84

once again you prove my point Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #86

You are right, duckhunter, he used a circumlocution to call a female a c--t. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #95

and it should have been hidden Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #97

We're making progress... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #109

I have said from the beginning Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #113

Random points DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #130

that would have been a reasonable and appropriate response samsingh Jun 2015 #134

Thank you Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #142

I was on a jury that hid a post that used those two words zeemike Jun 2015 #10

Do t forget cwydro Jun 2015 #24

Please. Orrex Jun 2015 #55

i think he did it in the heat of the moment, and in response to mopinko Jun 2015 #90

Yeah, I saw the exchange unfold in real time. Orrex Jun 2015 #136

he did. mopinko Jun 2015 #151

if I were a juror in a "real" trial that had a beyond-a-reasonable doubt bar to cross Kali Jun 2015 #179

What you just wrote is more offensive to me than what he wrote. The actual WORD is highly RiverLover Jun 2015 #3

Agree on purging mylye2222 Jun 2015 #4

Same thing happened to me tularetom Jun 2015 #14

Yes, when looking, witch hunters can always find the 'mark of the devil', here on DU it seems peacebird Jun 2015 #16

Who are these witches you speak of? boston bean Jun 2015 #18

A cunning stunt was the phrase he used, clearly a play on words against the person he was answering peacebird Jun 2015 #20

Care to answer the question? boston bean Jun 2015 #22

No - it is pretty clear. Not suprised you were on the jury peacebird Jun 2015 #23

On what jury? boston bean Jun 2015 #25

Too little caffeine, i misread your 'for the jury' peacebird Jun 2015 #28

Is she calling EarlG a "witch hunter"? Because that's who banned him. They hate Hillary so much Cha Jun 2015 #34

see my post 18! boston bean Jun 2015 #42

Actually, I got corrected.. she said "witch hunters".. so that makes EarlG a "witch hunter" since Cha Jun 2015 #61

They were talking about witch hunting, not calling anyone a witch... Violet_Crumble Jun 2015 #45

Thank you.. I changed it. Cha Jun 2015 #54

No probs, Cha... Violet_Crumble Jun 2015 #57

Ah, so they aren't called EarlG a witch, they're calling him an Inquisitor. KittyWampus Jun 2015 #66

No, they weren't calling him anything. I got the impression they were referring to a DU clique n/t Violet_Crumble Jun 2015 #68

Exactly. peacebird Jun 2015 #82

Hi Peacebird, violet has told me to ask you boston bean Jun 2015 #154

Why wouldn't she just ask herself? MannyGoldstein Jun 2015 #161

not sure. nt boston bean Jun 2015 #163

What clique would that be and is EarlG included in that? nt boston bean Jun 2015 #85

I've got no fucking idea and no interest in finding out n/t Violet_Crumble Jun 2015 #98

Well, you're the one who brought it up, thought you would know. boston bean Jun 2015 #110

Huh? I explained what the term witch-hunt meant, that's all... Violet_Crumble Jun 2015 #112

Great, thanks! the expletives had me worried. boston bean Jun 2015 #122

I swear a lot. It's what we do here... Violet_Crumble Jun 2015 #132

I don't mind swear words, I use them all the time. boston bean Jun 2015 #144

It's a cultural difference... Violet_Crumble Jun 2015 #166

What are we, in 2nd Grade... ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2015 #174

Good post, Cha. nt brer cat Jun 2015 #102

mahalo brer cat~ Cha Jun 2015 #115

Ah, yes. The old "outrage" accusation. Orrex Jun 2015 #60

Mahalo for your post, Orrex. Cha Jun 2015 #80

E.g., the folks that claim that noting Obama is angry about something MannyGoldstein Jun 2015 #143

Yes, the purge has begun Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #38

Post removed Post removed Jun 2015 #59

Like I said it is a purge Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #65

Sure. Orrex Jun 2015 #63

should have been a jury issue Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #67

Maybe, but I defer to the admins. Orrex Jun 2015 #72

I agree, it is the admins overall right Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #79

one member does not a purge make. mopinko Jun 2015 #91

we shall see who is next Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #101

as the urban dictionary puts it..."Most people can figure it out. " CTyankee Jun 2015 #121

Said poster didn't use the word either. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #123

By the definitions used, this post stands a good chance of getting an alert IdaBriggs Jun 2015 #15

Jury results: sufrommich Jun 2015 #21

and that would be factuall untrue Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #40

Why are you calling someone a liar. boston bean Jun 2015 #87

I am just saying what are facts Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #96

weak sauce for the gullible or possibly a deflection tactic. boston bean Jun 2015 #106

Sorry, no Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #111

Here are the facts. boston bean Jun 2015 #114

and the fact still is he never USED the "C" word Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #125

In your mind. boston bean Jun 2015 #131

Nope Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #139

This is getting tasking. boston bean Jun 2015 #140

Then they should stop saying he USED that word Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #146

People are not saying he used that word. boston bean Jun 2015 #148

The admin never used the word either. n/t whopis01 Jun 2015 #178

get over it. he knew what he was saying. mopinko Jun 2015 #164

...even though he didn't. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #93

If you post it enough Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #105

Post that please, where he used that word, I could not find it anywhere. sabrina 1 Jun 2015 #104

Either could I Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #108

He wasone of the good ones. Paka Jun 2015 #5

Yes. It is painfull mylye2222 Jun 2015 #6

. stonecutter357 Jun 2015 #7

Yeah, well.. no one is surprised. Cha Jun 2015 #172

NYC_SKP on 6/3/15: "You know what? You're a GOOD DU-er!" RiverLover Jun 2015 #9

I was a mod and a host and on MIRT with NYC_SKP, and he was one of my favorite DUers Rhiannon12866 Jun 2015 #11

He was a good egg, I liked him a lot. Didn't always agree with him, doesn't matter. Democracy peacebird Jun 2015 #17

Me too n/t hootinholler Jun 2015 #29

He was a gun-humping troll who posted vile stuff after Sandy Hook. KittyWampus Jun 2015 #13

He adored his gun porn skepticscott Jun 2015 #33

Ooooo, a post from Skinner. KittyWampus Jun 2015 #36

And here is NY_SKPs reply to Skinner Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #46

and he reposted his OP at the end of the thread boston bean Jun 2015 #49

No, bad hide IMO Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #58

Like has been said.. "trollish behavior".. pushing the limits of what he could get away with Cha Jun 2015 #167

There was a lot more vile crap he posted. It wasn't just that one post... KittyWampus Jun 2015 #62

you do not even know what my username means, do you? Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #77

When posters use infantile pejoratives like "gun humper" or "ammosexual"... Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #126

yes, when the name calling and Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #128

I got a hide in that thread! LOL boston bean Jun 2015 #39

You've got spirit, bean, if I'd have been on that jury you'd had had one vote on your side. marble falls Jun 2015 #94

Why thank you, marble falls! You're not to shabby yourself! boston bean Jun 2015 #147

a 6-0 hide Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #155

right. A troll I told that to. One who is now banned. boston bean Jun 2015 #156

still no excuse Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #158

was I complaining? nt boston bean Jun 2015 #162

you're weren't the only one who was pissed at SKP's big Gun OP when Sandy Hook happened.. Cha Jun 2015 #175

His post was in really really bad taste. boston bean Jun 2015 #177

I know. and now he's done it again. I edited and added to my previous post.. I said they were Cha Jun 2015 #181

Nobody "appreciated" SKP on this OP.. speaking of "who the hell trolls mass shootings where children Cha Jun 2015 #153

Heck, there's some pretty good name calling going on right in thread I see. madfloridian Jun 2015 #169

Ding ding ding alcibiades_mystery Jun 2015 #176

If NYC_SKP was so bad as to be banned over one post, and no hides, not even the one in question was -none Jun 2015 #19

Hides require that enough people actually vote to hide. The kids at the cool table KittyWampus Jun 2015 #27

I wasn't at DU during that horrific time(Sandy Hook), KittyWampus. RiverLover Jun 2015 #88

Good point. I have to watch out that I don't don't give passes when I'm called to jury. I admit.... marble falls Jun 2015 #107

actually my star membership is about to expire - does anyone know how to purge one's account? samsingh Jun 2015 #30

You can't "purge" your account. MH1 Jun 2015 #103

i can just stop donating as i've been doing for 15 years samsingh Jun 2015 #150

LOL that's ironic. I stopped donating because of a troll they didn't ban MH1 Jun 2015 #160

i am NOT a NYC_SKP fan - in fact we disagree extensively on gun control, middle east, and samsingh Jun 2015 #168

well my Star memebership Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #170

It's very easy to not be part of DU anymore alcibiades_mystery Jun 2015 #180

well, at least he'll have plenty of time now to shine up the chrome shotgun he claimed, KG Jun 2015 #31

Thank You. I don't collect dossiers on DU'ers like some here do… but I remember him trolling after KittyWampus Jun 2015 #32

And let's not forget how he skepticscott Jun 2015 #35

I've gotten thank you emails from people who knew what a troll he really was- KittyWampus Jun 2015 #41

mmm.. mmm... boston bean Jun 2015 #44

some people have a lot invested in the fiction NYC_SKP was an innocent martyr KittyWampus Jun 2015 #48

years worth... boston bean Jun 2015 #56

The Admins didn't mention that past MannyGoldstein Jun 2015 #117

and?? boston bean Jun 2015 #182

Those of us who frequent the Religion Group have a better picture skepticscott Jun 2015 #73

I have seen someone post he was anti-athiest. As in rudely, insultingly anti-atheist >>>> KittyWampus Jun 2015 #75

no doubt he his pizza was cumulative, not the result of one post. KG Jun 2015 #92

But the Admins didn't mention a cumulative past MannyGoldstein Jun 2015 #138

another true statement Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #149

I couldn't believe that.. it hurt my heart. It was sickening.. Why would he do something like that Cha Jun 2015 #37

Because he was a troll. That's what trolls do. KittyWampus Jun 2015 #43

IMO, it was stealth. boston bean Jun 2015 #47

Oh, he might be a Democrat. Trolls aren't just rightwing infiltrators. KittyWampus Jun 2015 #50

true... it's just that many of the times I noticed it boston bean Jun 2015 #53

I was thinking the same kinda of thing.. all the hoorahs, and Recs Cha Jun 2015 #52

Rec'd ibewlu606 Jun 2015 #51

How about calling someone who votes for a war based on lies that kills 1,000,000+ Iraqi civilians a KingCharlemagne Jun 2015 #145

I oppose the ban... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #64

It wasn't just one teeny-weeny post. Why so many DU'ers insist on that fiction KittyWampus Jun 2015 #70

Being a progressive and a casual or habitual misogynist is mutually exclusive. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #74

Being a progressive and being a gun-humping troll would also be mutually exclusive >>> KittyWampus Jun 2015 #78

i read that he was simply banned with no chance to edit post or apologize. barbtries Jun 2015 #83

As far as I know that is a true statement Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #89

In reading this thread it is clear to me why Dems have so much trouble winning elections. zeemike Jun 2015 #116

The question then becomes skepticscott Jun 2015 #120

i hope the guys let him come back. mopinko Jun 2015 #99

He did a lot of offensive, stupid stuff. Not just one thing. And he was the troll KittyWampus Jun 2015 #118

Stunning is the fredamae Jun 2015 #119

I saw the bias or prejudice in his comment that got him banned? boston bean Jun 2015 #124

Response Correction: That would be my fredamae Jun 2015 #129

As someone who has been called - OhZone Jun 2015 #127

In general, it just lets everyone know the deep lack of respect boston bean Jun 2015 #133

Exactly! n/t OhZone Jun 2015 #152

I know you feel the same way on Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #157

Why are you asking me this? nt boston bean Jun 2015 #159

I recall fondly his splaining us how to do sandy hook Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #135

A classic in gunner prose alcibiades_mystery Jun 2015 #183

This? Cha Jun 2015 #184

Selective enforcement of "the rules" isn't easily glossed over. 99Forever Jun 2015 #165

that is the thing that gets me Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #173