Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
Tue May 26, 2015, 08:34 PM May 2015

Bernie Sanders Is A Totally Legitimate Presidential Candidate. And It's Time The Press Started Treat [View all]

Bernie Sanders is a totally legitimate presidential candidate. And it's time the press started treating him like one.
Ryan Cooper - TheWeek
May 26, 2015


AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

<snip>

In democracy, the voters decide who wins a presidential election. But the media has great influence over which candidates get serious consideration. So when it comes to Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and the 2016 race, it's clear that he's getting a raw deal. It's long since time the press gave him the respect he deserves.

Jay Rosen, the New York University journalism professor, has a useful concept for describing the ideology of journalists: nested spheres of legitimacy. These have to do with the way ideas are presented in a piece of journalism. The idea of women's suffrage is presented as non-controversial, thus placed in the "sphere of consensus." The idea that aliens control the government, say, is presented as nuts, thus placed in the "sphere of deviance." The latter ideas are openly presented in the news as illegitimate or insane, if they are not ignored altogether.

What ideas go in which sphere is an inescapable part of journalism, though most reporters don't acknowledge they're doing it. And at the moment, the idea of Bernie Sanders as a candidate is getting placed in the deviant sphere. As Steve Hendricks noted, the media has mostly presented Sanders as a non-serious kook:

The Times, for example, buried his announcement on page A21, even though every other candidate who had declared before then had been put on the front page above the fold. Sanders's straight-news story didn't even crack 700 words, compared to the 1,100 to 1,500 that Marco Rubio, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, and Hillary Clinton got. As for the content, the Times' reporters declared high in Sanders' piece that he was a long shot for the Democratic nomination and that Clinton was all but a lock. None of the Republican entrants got the long-shot treatment, even though Paul, Rubio, and Cruz were generally polling fifth, seventh, and eighth among Republicans before they announced. <Columbia Journalism Review>


Indeed, if anything Sanders is more credible than the likes of Paul and Cruz. He has risen markedly in the polls of late, where his support has about tripled since the end of last year. He's doing particularly well in New Hampshire, where a recent poll put him in second place at 18 percent support. As an opponent of the Iraq War and a longtime advocate for more progressive policy, he has a natural constituency in the liberal left, where he is genuinely admired.

Will he win? The odds are surely against him. Clinton's level of name recognition, money, and elite support — Sanders didn't even pick up an endorsement from the governor of his home state — makes it a very tough challenge. But it's conceivable that he could win. As Hendricks notes, dark horse challengers like Jimmy Carter have reached victory facing even longer odds.

But more to the point, it is simply inappropriate for powerful media figures to consistently bookend any mention of Sanders with comments about his inevitable electoral demise. Matt Yglesias, for example, presents Sanders' loss as so certain that if Clinton were to drop out, he would inevitably lose to Martin O'Malley.

It would be one thing to say that after February next year, when the primaries will have started. Statements like "he doesn't seem to have a realistic path to winning the nomination" could be grounded in realistic, near-term projections. But a lot can happen in eight months! And it's frankly ridiculous to present Sanders as a less credible candidate than O'Malley, who is currently polling behind Lincoln Chafee at 1.2 percent.

The constant presumptions about the electoral viability of some candidate amounts to an attempt to influence the outcome of the election, whether it's intentional or not...


<snip>

More: http://theweek.com/articles/556667/bernie-sanders-totally-legitimate-presidential-candidate-time-press-started-treating-like





64 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Start framing it as a Sanders vs the GOP situation, because THAT's what it is! NYC_SKP May 2015 #1
Corpmedia will do whatever it takes to push GOP into WH. blm May 2015 #2
The media is gonna need a lot of persuading after truth-telling like this. canoeist52 May 2015 #3
So, how many more talk shows does he need to become a totally legitimate candidate by the press? Thinkingabout May 2015 #4
Missed it by a mile nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #7
He has had tons of press coverage... Agschmid May 2015 #13
The coment was about how PAPERS, you know old fashioned paper and ink nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #16
I read a newspaper once or twice, a few years ago... Agschmid May 2015 #17
But not so old that it is completely gone nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #18
I give it five years, max. Agschmid May 2015 #19
We have been hearing that for the last 20 nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #20
How about printer papers eloydude May 2015 #43
Don't tell anyone nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #44
your secret is safe with me! eloydude May 2015 #46
And How Come... Hillary Is Considered Legitimate... With Nary A Press Conference ??? WillyT May 2015 #8
Because people support her in large numbers...with nary a Press Conference? brooklynite May 2015 #11
Perfect... For Every Opportunity Where Hillary Retreats, Bernie Should Come Forward And Speak... WillyT May 2015 #25
She hasn't been retreating... Agschmid May 2015 #27
"Secretary Clinton... Where Do You Stand On The TPP ???" WillyT May 2015 #30
Meh. Agschmid May 2015 #31
That's Also Very Dangerous... WillyT May 2015 #33
They need her, more than she needs them it seems. Agschmid May 2015 #34
Well... You Read Different History Books Than I Do... WillyT May 2015 #36
If he did say that (and there's no evidence he did) then it's over 100 years old muriel_volestrangler May 2015 #52
Good quote. Agschmid May 2015 #37
When did you become such a fighter for the corporate-controlled MSM? Cali_Democrat May 2015 #50
Um... I Believe That The Article Was A Shot AGAINST The Corporate Controlled MSM... WillyT May 2015 #59
BTW... I Cannot Wait For The Debates... Hillary Will Have Nowhere To Hide... Unless... WillyT May 2015 #29
She would have a hell of a time with Bernie. Elmer S. E. Dump May 2015 #41
Upwards of 68% of the polled electorate supports her, that's why. Agschmid May 2015 #12
Is it required? Bernie can choose to run his campaign as he sees fit, Hillary is running her Thinkingabout May 2015 #23
Well we treat ALL as serious contenders nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #5
I Know YOU Do... WillyT May 2015 #9
Yes! sueh May 2015 #6
I will concur that Sanders is as credible a candidate as O'Malley and Chafee... brooklynite May 2015 #10
Having attended a Ron Paul Rally, like for real nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #22
I see you don't mention Clinton too. eloydude May 2015 #45
Sanders is authentic & charismatic, the more people see him, the more they love him. peacebird May 2015 #51
The average voter doesn't "love" any politician... brooklynite May 2015 #53
Trying to be positive, say nothing negative about HRC yet you keep on sending downer-debbie vibes peacebird May 2015 #54
I'm a big kid...I can take some criticism brooklynite May 2015 #55
I don't see how HRC can get elected in general. She lacks the charisma and easy speaking manner peacebird May 2015 #56
There must be a way we can put pressure on the corp-media. nm rhett o rick May 2015 #14
You Use Social Media To Start The Fire... Once Going... They'll Cover It... WillyT May 2015 #24
The corporate media will give press/air time to the corporates candidates. onecaliberal May 2015 #15
Sanders has had some of the most on-air time in recent weeks. Agschmid May 2015 #28
Ding, ding, ding. We have a winner. Scuba May 2015 #32
Yeah that's why not even MSGOP showed the entire speech. onecaliberal May 2015 #42
Media are in the ignoring phase still. BadgerKid May 2015 #21
Bernie has a lot of material to work with ... quadrature May 2015 #26
He is a brilliant public speaker... what a clear message, classic down to earth, Hillary cannot whereisjustice May 2015 #35
Speaking Of Which... Did You See THIS: WillyT May 2015 #40
K & R !!!! Thespian2 May 2015 #38
Beyond legitimate. He puts the rest to shame. Elmer S. E. Dump May 2015 #39
^ Wilms May 2015 #47
The Revolution Will Not Be Televised dreamnightwind May 2015 #48
Once he climbs enough in the polls to be competitive with Hilary the media will pay more attention NobodyHere May 2015 #49
The press has no interest in truth DonCoquixote May 2015 #57
What if the truth has no interest in press? nolabels May 2015 #63
and that is why some of us DonCoquixote May 2015 #64
He has to get their attention treestar May 2015 #58
K&R, spot on. Martin Eden May 2015 #60
K&R yuiyoshida May 2015 #61
How dare he (Bernie) have clear positions JEB May 2015 #62
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bernie Sanders Is A Total...