Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
No, the shootings are in no way excusable [View all] whatchamacallit May 2015 OP
beheading non believers is also considered the right thing to do in certain religions nt msongs May 2015 #1
Forcing children to do without medical care or medicine is also the "right thing to do", Fred Sanders May 2015 #2
+1 n/t markpkessinger May 2015 #43
+1 n/t markpkessinger May 2015 #43
Our close allies, the Saudis, seem to think it's the right thing to do for practically any transgression whatchamacallit May 2015 #3
Depends on how much... MellowDem May 2015 #6
Maybe you think the Klan should exercise their rights whatchamacallit May 2015 #7
I think they can... MellowDem May 2015 #12
No be "brave", if that's how you want to characterize Geller's provocation, whatchamacallit May 2015 #14
Geller's not responsible... MellowDem May 2015 #20
Question itcfish May 2015 #26
Two... MellowDem May 2015 #28
Maybe I think they have the right to do so, GGJohn May 2015 #65
Trump agrees with you... MellowDem May 2015 #4
Of course you do whatchamacallit May 2015 #5
No, I was raised conservative Christian... MellowDem May 2015 #8
Well that explains a lot whatchamacallit May 2015 #11
can't yelled if good nature snark... MellowDem May 2015 #13
Twas brillig, and the slithy toves? whatchamacallit May 2015 #16
Can't tell MellowDem May 2015 #18
Nor do I. She's a savvy individual, and knows precisely which bottom-feeders will accept the bait LanternWaste May 2015 #9
And an analog clock frozen at 1:49 will be correct twice a day. nt Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #10
Should have stopped with your title... Oktober May 2015 #15
Haha whatchamacallit May 2015 #17
Thanks... Oktober May 2015 #25
Of course. Because everything is black and white, right? Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #19
She's a victim... MellowDem May 2015 #21
Bullshit whatchamacallit May 2015 #23
Even if she did... MellowDem May 2015 #27
Geller's not a victim. Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #32
If violence is never an excuse... MellowDem May 2015 #34
She's no more a victim than you or me. Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #38
Because violence is never an excuse... MellowDem May 2015 #40
That's an insane hypothetical. Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #41
It illustrates my point perfectly... MellowDem May 2015 #45
Do you think that security guard wanted to be shot? Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #49
It's not like the body guard didn't know the risk... MellowDem May 2015 #56
Bear with me for a second here. Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #70
Not for this wrong... MellowDem May 2015 #83
If she knowingly and intentionally contributed to the violence and actually sought that result.... Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #84
Why does it matter what her motivation was again? Oktober May 2015 #24
She wanted violence, and violence she got. Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #33
In short... You think that words and 'incitement' are enough to justify violence... Oktober May 2015 #35
In short, you just strawmanned me. Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #39
I knew a guy who knocked the shit out of his wife... Oktober May 2015 #47
We're talking about Pam Geller here. Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #48
Keep on digging... Oktober May 2015 #52
Can you please explain to me what exactly you think I'm trying to justify here? Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #53
In the sense that her organization was attacked... Oktober May 2015 #54
It should be noted that Geller's group *organized* the event. She herself was not a participant. Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #69
You are clinging to some very odd notions... Oktober May 2015 #71
Will you please give it up with the whole "short skirt" analogy? That's a non-starter. Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #72
Just because you don't like her... Oktober May 2015 #73
Did the ACLU/NAACP/Code Pink/whatever want to see a violent response that placed people in danger? Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #74
You keep saying it... Oktober May 2015 #75
Do you honestly believe Pam Geller is all about First Amendment? Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #76
You are all over the place... Oktober May 2015 #77
If she's claiming victimhood status--and guess what, she is--it does motivate her. Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #78
Look... Oktober May 2015 #80
Gotcha Cartman. nt Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #81
Agreed. PeaceNikki May 2015 #22
I think Geller was playing off the response to the Charlie Hebdo incident, Maedhros May 2015 #29
They do - there's more room to debate because Geller is such a reprehensible person el_bryanto May 2015 #30
Indeed. n/t whatchamacallit May 2015 #31
Agree totally. NanceGreggs May 2015 #36
I am pleased whatchamacallit May 2015 #37
Nuance is for the few, apparently. nt Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #50
This happened in the US cemaphonic May 2015 #42
It is not an American tradition to insult and vilify an entire other religion, is it? Free speech Fred Sanders May 2015 #46
Actually it IS a new American tradition guillaumeb May 2015 #51
Bears are animals with no control over their behavior BlueStater May 2015 #55
Respectfully disagree mariuma May 2015 #57
Right melman May 2015 #58
Grizzlies are wild animals. Codeine May 2015 #59
Comprehension fail whatchamacallit May 2015 #63
Having an abortion clinic inspires bombers. Codeine May 2015 #64
People seriously don't understand metaphors. nt Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #66
OP summary: why defend universal freedoms? who are we to blame intolerance? Yorktown May 2015 #60
truly hoping this is sarcasm... mariuma May 2015 #61
Thanks for the love, yes, it was sarcasm. Yorktown May 2015 #62
What projecting on the world? It was in fucking Texas. CBGLuthier May 2015 #67
I was going to post the same thing. Coventina May 2015 #82
You're right about the cultural differences but... randome May 2015 #68
You are aware that we are not living in Saudi Arabia? Arugula Latte May 2015 #79
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No, the shootings are in ...»Reply #59