Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Better Believe It

(18,630 posts)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 11:16 PM Apr 2012

Shame on Obama Administration for Sacrificing Children to Keep Agribusiness Happy [View all]



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 27, 2012

Shame on Obama Administration for Sacrificing Children to Keep Agribusiness Happy

Statement of Dr. Sammy Almashat, Researcher, Public Citizen’s Health Research Group


WASHINGTON - April 27 - The Obama administration on Thursday once again sided with industry instead of workers on regulations and withdrew the Department of Labor’s (DOL) proposed rules that would have restricted child workers from the most dangerous tasks in agriculture.

Agriculture is the last remaining industry in which children as young as 12 are allowed to work, thanks to a 75 year-old loophole in the Fair Labor Standards Act. It also is the most dangerous industry for workers, with child fatality rates four times that of youth in other industries. The new rules would have finally addressed this urgent issue.

This isn’t the first time the rules have been undercut by the White House. The proposed rules already were delayed by the White House for nine months before it finally permitted their release last August. And in an extraordinary move, the administration stated yesterday that its decision to withdraw the rules “was made in response to thousands of comments expressing concerns about the effect of the proposed rules on small family-owned farms,” despite the fact that family farms were explicitly exempted from the rules.

Industry critics of the rules, and their allies in Congress, constantly invoked the image of an idyllic family farm to conceal the reality that the rules were meant to address large, corporate farms where the majority of child laborers work and die. The White House not only caved to industry pressure, but also parroted its false argument as the reason for the rules’ withdrawal.

In siding with the agricultural industry at the expense of the children it employs, the Obama administration has let industry preferences take precedence over the lives and health of child workers. More children will collapse from heat exposure, more will suffer from acute nicotine poisoning while picking tobacco leaves and more will be crushed to death in grain augers or tractor accidents – thanks to the Obama administration’s reversal.

The administration constantly invokes cost-benefit analysis to justify its inaction on regulations. Apparently, the administration considers these children’s lives and health a small cost to pay to win a few extra points from big agribusiness.
.
###

Public Citizen is a national, nonprofit consumer advocacy organization founded in 1971 to represent consumer interests in Congress, the executive branch and the courts.

http://www.citizen.org/pressroom/pressroomredirect.cfm?ID=3595
45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gut feeling: ProSense Apr 2012 #1
Major agri-business' do NOT care. russspeakeasy Apr 2012 #2
I Grew Up On A Farm LeFleur1 Apr 2012 #3
This is not about prohibiting children from helping out with chores on small family farms. Better Believe It Apr 2012 #6
Self-delete bhikkhu Apr 2012 #8
This is not about family farms. Read the article. I agree with you that children sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #9
A little bit more info on why the decision was made to drop the legislation: blue neen Apr 2012 #13
That would make sense were it not for the fact that family farms would have been specifically Dragonfli Apr 2012 #19
It was the perception about the family farms, not the reality. blue neen Apr 2012 #22
You're exactly right. proud2BlibKansan Apr 2012 #25
Yes the rules did apply to family farms... farmbo Apr 2012 #40
Newt Gingrich must be thrilled. This is just wrong and there's no excuse. limpyhobbler Apr 2012 #4
And rumor has it he eats babies for breakfast MagickMuffin Apr 2012 #5
Child labor is double plus good! neverforget Apr 2012 #7
Are you in favor of child labor? sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #11
Do you have an opinion on the news release and issue? Better Believe It Apr 2012 #12
you cool with a "loop-hole" for child labor? fascisthunter Apr 2012 #16
welcome back quinnox Apr 2012 #10
haha.... fascisthunter Apr 2012 #15
Presidency has a Pricetag fascisthunter Apr 2012 #14
keep trying. dionysus Apr 2012 #17
very trying Whisp Apr 2012 #18
Somebody has to, I remember a time when we all (or most all) tried to oppose unsafe child labor laws Dragonfli Apr 2012 #20
+10000 This apologism is a disgrace. nt woo me with science Apr 2012 #24
Right. For 75 years, this has been the norm. randome Apr 2012 #21
Do you have an opinion on the news release and child labor? Better Believe It Apr 2012 #23
Your inflammatory subject line is what I object to. randome Apr 2012 #27
I believe the subject line was from the headline of the article. NCTraveler Apr 2012 #42
I didn't write it. Send your complaint to the progressives who wrote it. Better Believe It Apr 2012 #44
Child labor laws are a good thing obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #26
The loophole has existed for 75 years. randome Apr 2012 #28
Inaction is an action obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #36
No offense meant. randome Apr 2012 #38
Given the strong objections by farm families, maybe these MineralMan Apr 2012 #29
This is a great apologist caricature. rudycantfail Apr 2012 #32
+1 obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #37
Go to this link,then you can delete your post. Swede Apr 2012 #30
A rational proposal. randome Apr 2012 #31
Totally conclusions treestar Apr 2012 #33
Post removed Post removed Apr 2012 #34
I don't know, it's a pretty good example of overreach. randome Apr 2012 #35
It seems to me that BBI supports the administrations original policy. NCTraveler Apr 2012 #43
Welcome back! great white snark Apr 2012 #39
The administrations reason for pulling back is very strange. NCTraveler Apr 2012 #41
It makes sense once you understand that politics is more important than policy Dragonfli Apr 2012 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Shame on Obama Administra...