Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
35. more expert than you, i'd guess.
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 01:03 PM
Feb 2015

Then in May 1984 he was commissioned as an intelligence officer in the United States Marine Corps. He served in this capacity for about 12 years.[2]

He served as the lead analyst for the Marine Corps Rapid Deployment Force concerning the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the Iran–Iraq War.

[4] During Desert Storm, he served as a ballistic missile advisor to General Norman Schwarzkopf.

Ritter "ran intelligence operations for the United Nations"[6] from 1991 to 1998 as a United Nations weapons inspector in Iraq in the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM), which was charged with finding and destroying all weapons of mass destruction and WMD-related manufacturing capabilities in Iraq. He was chief inspector in fourteen of the more than thirty inspection missions in which he participated.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Ritter

Nice to hear from Scott again! 90-percent Feb 2015 #1
Scott was just released from jail for his fourth sex offense conviction.... msanthrope Feb 2015 #2
More importantly, Scott was a conduit for Ahmed Chalabi's disinformation about Iraq WMDs. leveymg Feb 2015 #53
Well, looks like Ritter had his hands in many dirty pies before he "turned." msanthrope Feb 2015 #62
I wouldn't include all the intelligence analysts on that list. leveymg Feb 2015 #63
Scott Ritter is currently in outpatient sex offender therapy, per his parole. msanthrope Feb 2015 #3
What if the government set him up? Octafish Feb 2015 #4
Four damn times? Twice before he ever spoke up about WMDs? Did they msanthrope Feb 2015 #5
Yeah, but...but...I got nothin'. randome Feb 2015 #7
Your jury results Ruby the Liberal Feb 2015 #23
Wow. That's...that's...I got nothin'. randome Feb 2015 #46
Where were the FEDs when one of their own was using the Internet to troll for minors? Octafish Feb 2015 #10
typical. nt Dreamer Tatum Feb 2015 #11
Typical what, ignorance? Octafish Feb 2015 #15
did you know that hasnt a fucking thing to do with Ritter? Dreamer Tatum Feb 2015 #17
What's McCarthyesque are your smears, Dreamer Tatum. Octafish Feb 2015 #21
Sorry, but when you try to CT away things that are inconvenient to your narrative Dreamer Tatum Feb 2015 #26
So, when you don't have anything to rebut with, your M.O. is to attack the messenger. Octafish Feb 2015 #29
No, you're a little more artful than that. You attack the messenger's source and rebut with nonsense Dreamer Tatum Feb 2015 #32
You sound mad -- angry, not crazy -- Dreamer Tatum. Octafish Feb 2015 #51
Thanks for speaking up and setting the record straight. FarPoint Feb 2015 #84
The review was completed at Sun Feb 8, 2015, 11:05 AM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2015 #24
Dear Juror #1 Octafish Feb 2015 #55
+1...nt SidDithers Feb 2015 #86
And this exonerates Ritter, how? Did someone use a time machine to go msanthrope Feb 2015 #12
It's not meant to exonerate anyone. It shows how corrupt the government is. Octafish Feb 2015 #14
Actually you do know he's a predator. Dreamer Tatum Feb 2015 #18
Link? Or is it one of those things, "Take my word on it." Octafish Feb 2015 #22
It's a condition of parole, Octa. You admit to your crime. It's also a condition of being in an msanthrope Feb 2015 #41
How do you know "they" didn't MAKE him say that? hughee99 Feb 2015 #43
results Go Vols Feb 2015 #57
I have no opinion about Ritter's actions, but i do know something about Jackpine Radical Feb 2015 #50
If I thought Ritter were actually innocent, I'd be concerned. But I tend to think msanthrope Feb 2015 #65
I'm concerned about the process, not about Ritter. Jackpine Radical Feb 2015 #67
Oh--I am not disagreeing with your second paragraph.....just questioning the efficacy of using msanthrope Feb 2015 #69
In tactical terms, you're right, I'm sure. Jackpine Radical Feb 2015 #71
Except there is no message from Ritter. randome Feb 2015 #73
Yes they are Jim Beard Feb 2015 #77
Are you saying there is a good image of them that we're simply overlooking? randome Feb 2015 #78
Even if its just as evil people? Jim Beard Feb 2015 #83
Totally agree with you. Back when, when we were desperate for voices against UTUSN Feb 2015 #8
Well..I maintain that a man more interested in the cause than himself might msanthrope Feb 2015 #9
Yip, it opens up a rational trail of speculation: UTUSN Feb 2015 #13
Hubris--there's an endless supply of it. nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #45
In that regard, it parallels stupidity. Jackpine Radical Feb 2015 #68
He's probably a fit source for commentary on the Middle East. Spider Jerusalem Feb 2015 #20
Maybe. And David Duke may have a really great blueberry pie recipe. Thing is, there's msanthrope Feb 2015 #47
That does not wipe his brain of info about the Middle East n/t eridani Feb 2015 #88
You find an ME expert who isn't a sex offender? Can't you see the problem here? nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #89
And Ritter is now an expert on ISIS because...:shrug:? randome Feb 2015 #6
He had time to study up on it while in the slammer! greatauntoftriplets Feb 2015 #19
more expert than you, i'd guess. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #35
Well, ISIS didn't exist back then but sure, he may be privy to information I would not. randome Feb 2015 #48
k/r marmar Feb 2015 #16
Character assassination of a convicted sex offender? tabasco Feb 2015 #27
Fine. What does it have to do with ISIS? marmar Feb 2015 #28
You're the one that brought up the issue of Ritter's character tabasco Feb 2015 #31
So in other words, you don't have an answer. marmar Feb 2015 #34
Actually, it seems you do not, so allow me to assist: tabasco Feb 2015 #72
Just horrible what he was tricked into...oops..I mean what he did. elias49 Feb 2015 #30
... Dreamer Tatum Feb 2015 #33
Who tried what with Assange? nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #40
... SidDithers Feb 2015 #87
He is so right on this. Autumn Feb 2015 #25
There are many experts on the subject that I can turn to. trumad Feb 2015 #36
Another expert. JEB Feb 2015 #38
Because the government never sets anybody up. Octafish Feb 2015 #52
stop it. trumad Feb 2015 #54
For pointing out the government lies? Octafish Feb 2015 #56
Just trying to help. trumad Feb 2015 #58
So, guilt by association, rather than what I wrote. Octafish Feb 2015 #59
Meh. Pointless to argue with one who is elias49 Feb 2015 #61
No you didn't do a funny.. trumad Feb 2015 #70
Ritter was right on WMD's and right on this. JEB Feb 2015 #37
so fucking what... trumad Feb 2015 #39
Jeebus--it's like we're so starving for experts on the Middle East we have to go with the msanthrope Feb 2015 #42
More interested in his take on ISIS than his "other activities". JEB Feb 2015 #44
Fuck that sick fuck and his opinion. trumad Feb 2015 #49
As a matter of fact Ritter didn't elias49 Feb 2015 #74
Your right... trumad Feb 2015 #75
I just wanted you to correct your misinformation. elias49 Feb 2015 #76
The only mistake I made was... trumad Feb 2015 #79
Key mistake old chap. nt elias49 Feb 2015 #80
ok... trumad Feb 2015 #81
It is not complicated. Fuck ISIS. Destroy every atom of Lint Head Feb 2015 #60
Scott Ritter right again. elias49 Feb 2015 #64
Why would you compare Snowden to a convicted sex offender? I'm a bit puzzled by your choice of msanthrope Feb 2015 #66
Scott Ritter? bluestateguy Feb 2015 #82
How come nobody mentioned the concept of rehabilitation? 90-percent Feb 2015 #85
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Scott Ritter: A Tipping P...»Reply #35