Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Warren can run for president. She should run for president. & despite her denials, she probably will [View all]Response to xchrom (Original post)
Corruption Inc This message was self-deleted by its author.
Edit history
Cannot view edit history for self-deleted messages.
123 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Warren can run for president. She should run for president. & despite her denials, she probably will [View all]
xchrom
Jan 2015
OP
Though I know and would heavily support Bernie, I think she's a better practical choice...
cascadiance
Jan 2015
#85
Not all leaders NEED to be president. We need people in Congress, leading from within and among.
NYC Liberal
Jan 2015
#112
I didn't think so. No one who talks about how much more effective Warren can be in the Senate
merrily
Jan 2015
#68
Give me a minute to think why something that condescending deserves a reply, k?
merrily
Jan 2015
#81
So funny that they just won't see Hillary's ship has sailed. It was sunk in 2008
Autumn
Jan 2015
#88
Good thing we didn't let a silly idea like yours stop us from electing a young Senator from Illinois
Autumn
Jan 2015
#111
Did you say that Obama should stay in the Senate when he said he wasn't running for President?
Autumn
Jan 2015
#116
Seems to me the Warren fans are getting pissed off at her now that she made her statement...
MohRokTah
Jan 2015
#2
Yep, too bad. Looks like we'll only have one candidate that acts like a Democrat.
Dawgs
Jan 2015
#52
Yup. Not that much. It's not only yabout llife expectancy, but about performance; and
merrily
Jan 2015
#119
I think Warren's been "bugged" by the corporate media to commit to a run more than Hillary....
cascadiance
Jan 2015
#89
Yes, he spends his time in Iowa and New Hampshire and is putting together an organization.
FSogol
Jan 2015
#46
That's exciting. I looked into his record very briefly a few months ago when I posted asking
merrily
Jan 2015
#50
Here's a good Mother Jones article on him. They called him the most environmentally friendly of
FSogol
Jan 2015
#56
Thanks. That's very helpful of you. I bookmarked and will read when I can concentrate on it.
merrily
Jan 2015
#60
Well, I guess you think baby llamas should be killed for toothpaste additivies. Nice.
FSogol
Jan 2015
#58
They'll just move on to some other fantasy candidate (who isn't running) and proclaim them as
FSogol
Jan 2015
#103
David Frum says Warren will be doing a disservice to her principals if she doesn't run.
NCTraveler
Jan 2015
#28
Why would Dems give her that label? I cannot recall other Dem primary candidates getting that label.
merrily
Jan 2015
#47
No. In 2008, I was on a political board that allowed posters of all political persuasions--anywhere
merrily
Jan 2015
#55
I think that very much depends on whether what they say is consistent with their past.
merrily
Jan 2015
#67
Thats not how I remember it. As I remember it, Warren wanted the job of administering Dodd Frank,
merrily
Jan 2015
#57
Warren is in an excellent position of advocating for the consumers of the US, she is very good in
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#14
Considering her positions on Israel/Gaza, bombing the Islamic State, and the role of religion in...
FrodosPet
Jan 2015
#62
I'm very aware of her positions. No bus for Liz. She still has my support and I am against Obamas
Autumn
Jan 2015
#95
If you go to the EWG here, you'll learn more. Like she was just awarded a MLK award & gave a really
RiverLover
Jan 2015
#40
Until now, no one knew how much more power a Senator who is in the minority in her own party,
merrily
Jan 2015
#87
Warren is too militaristic for my tastes, but when the alternative is HRC, what the fuck
Vattel
Jan 2015
#73
I don't see her as militaristic at all. I do see her as passionate though.
stillwaiting
Jan 2015
#105
By militarisitc I mean too ready to resort to military force to accomplish political objectives.
Vattel
Jan 2015
#106
Warren doesn't strike me as a person who 'plays' politics and games with the public.
Sheepshank
Jan 2015
#86
And the folks Republicans count on for running with their narrative continue to do it.
great white snark
Jan 2015
#94
Boy...why are some people so OBSESSED about proving that Warren's going to run?
brooklynite
Jan 2015
#96