Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Warren can run for president. She should run for president. & despite her denials, she probably will [View all]
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/01/run-warren-run/384490/?ni4z15
Elizabeth Warren today told Fortune magazine that she wont run for president. If Warren stands by that decision, shell do a tremendous disservice to her principles and her party.
Warren is the only person standing between the Democrats and an uncontested Hillary Clinton nomination. She has already made clear what she thinks of the Clintons.
Warren has suggested that President Bill Clintons administration served the same trickle down economics as its Republicans and predecessors.
Warren has denounced the Clinton administration's senior economic appointees as servitors of the big banks.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
123 replies, 8636 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (39)
ReplyReply to this post
123 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Warren can run for president. She should run for president. & despite her denials, she probably will [View all]
xchrom
Jan 2015
OP
Though I know and would heavily support Bernie, I think she's a better practical choice...
cascadiance
Jan 2015
#85
Not all leaders NEED to be president. We need people in Congress, leading from within and among.
NYC Liberal
Jan 2015
#112
I didn't think so. No one who talks about how much more effective Warren can be in the Senate
merrily
Jan 2015
#68
Give me a minute to think why something that condescending deserves a reply, k?
merrily
Jan 2015
#81
So funny that they just won't see Hillary's ship has sailed. It was sunk in 2008
Autumn
Jan 2015
#88
Good thing we didn't let a silly idea like yours stop us from electing a young Senator from Illinois
Autumn
Jan 2015
#111
Did you say that Obama should stay in the Senate when he said he wasn't running for President?
Autumn
Jan 2015
#116
Seems to me the Warren fans are getting pissed off at her now that she made her statement...
MohRokTah
Jan 2015
#2
Yep, too bad. Looks like we'll only have one candidate that acts like a Democrat.
Dawgs
Jan 2015
#52
Yup. Not that much. It's not only yabout llife expectancy, but about performance; and
merrily
Jan 2015
#119
I think Warren's been "bugged" by the corporate media to commit to a run more than Hillary....
cascadiance
Jan 2015
#89
Yes, he spends his time in Iowa and New Hampshire and is putting together an organization.
FSogol
Jan 2015
#46
That's exciting. I looked into his record very briefly a few months ago when I posted asking
merrily
Jan 2015
#50
Here's a good Mother Jones article on him. They called him the most environmentally friendly of
FSogol
Jan 2015
#56
Thanks. That's very helpful of you. I bookmarked and will read when I can concentrate on it.
merrily
Jan 2015
#60
Well, I guess you think baby llamas should be killed for toothpaste additivies. Nice.
FSogol
Jan 2015
#58
They'll just move on to some other fantasy candidate (who isn't running) and proclaim them as
FSogol
Jan 2015
#103
David Frum says Warren will be doing a disservice to her principals if she doesn't run.
NCTraveler
Jan 2015
#28
Why would Dems give her that label? I cannot recall other Dem primary candidates getting that label.
merrily
Jan 2015
#47
No. In 2008, I was on a political board that allowed posters of all political persuasions--anywhere
merrily
Jan 2015
#55
I think that very much depends on whether what they say is consistent with their past.
merrily
Jan 2015
#67
Thats not how I remember it. As I remember it, Warren wanted the job of administering Dodd Frank,
merrily
Jan 2015
#57
Warren is in an excellent position of advocating for the consumers of the US, she is very good in
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#14
Considering her positions on Israel/Gaza, bombing the Islamic State, and the role of religion in...
FrodosPet
Jan 2015
#62
I'm very aware of her positions. No bus for Liz. She still has my support and I am against Obamas
Autumn
Jan 2015
#95
If you go to the EWG here, you'll learn more. Like she was just awarded a MLK award & gave a really
RiverLover
Jan 2015
#40
Until now, no one knew how much more power a Senator who is in the minority in her own party,
merrily
Jan 2015
#87
Warren is too militaristic for my tastes, but when the alternative is HRC, what the fuck
Vattel
Jan 2015
#73
I don't see her as militaristic at all. I do see her as passionate though.
stillwaiting
Jan 2015
#105
By militarisitc I mean too ready to resort to military force to accomplish political objectives.
Vattel
Jan 2015
#106
Warren doesn't strike me as a person who 'plays' politics and games with the public.
Sheepshank
Jan 2015
#86
And the folks Republicans count on for running with their narrative continue to do it.
great white snark
Jan 2015
#94
Boy...why are some people so OBSESSED about proving that Warren's going to run?
brooklynite
Jan 2015
#96