Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 07:42 PM Dec 2014

STATEMENT BY FORMER NEW REPUBLIC EDITORS AND WRITERS [View all]


STATEMENT BY FORMER NEW REPUBLIC EDITORS AND WRITERS

Published on Robert Reich's Facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/RBReich?fref=nf

As former editors and writers for The New Republic, we write to express our dismay and sorrow at its destruction in all but name.

From its founding in 1914, The New Republic has been the flagship and forum of American liberalism. Its reporting and commentary on politics, society, and arts and letters have nurtured a broad liberal spirit in our national life.

The magazine’s present owner and managers claim they are giving it new relevance while remaining true to its century-old mission. Instead, they seem determined to strip it of the intellectual, literary, and political commitments that have been its essence and meaning. Their pronouncements suggest that they hold those commitments in contempt.

The New Republic cannot be merely a “brand.” It has never been and cannot be a “media company” that markets “content.” Its essays, criticism, reportage, and poetry are not “product.” It is not, or not primarily, a business. It is a voice, even a cause. It has lasted through numerous transformations of the “media landscape”—transformations that, far from rendering its work obsolete, have made that work ever more valuable.

The New Republic is a kind of public trust. That is something all its previous owners and publishers understood and respected. The legacy has now been trashed, the trust violated.

It is a sad irony that at this perilous moment, with a reactionary variant of conservatism in the ascendancy, liberalism’s central journal should be scuttled with flagrant and frivolous abandon. The promise of American life has been dealt a lamentable blow.

Peter Beinart (Editor)
Sidney Blumenthal (Senior editor)
Jonathan Chait (Senior editor)
David Grann (Senior editor)
David Greenberg (Acting editor)
Hendrik Hertzberg (Editor)
Ann Hulbert (Senior editor)
Robert Kuttner (Economics editor)
Robert B. Reich (Contributing editor)
Jeffrey Rosen (Legal editor)
Peter Scoblic (Executive editor)
Evan Smith (Deputy editor)
Joan Stapleton Tooley (Publisher)
Paul Starr (Contributing editor)
Ronald Steel (Contributing editor)
Andrew Sullivan (Editor)
Margaret Talbot (Deputy editor)
Dorothy Wickenden (Executive editor)
Sean Wilentz (Contributing editor)
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
... Dont call me Shirley Dec 2014 #1
Boy, the fact that you guys didn't resign under Peretz jeff47 Dec 2014 #2
…and so why don't you elucidate why these individuals PCIntern Dec 2014 #5
whether or not they should have resigned under Peretz --- he may have been slightly less racist than Douglas Carpenter Dec 2014 #6
Wow. Stunned. n/t SylviaD Dec 2014 #10
rather shocking isn't it. I mean all these liberal luminaries working on a magazine with someone Douglas Carpenter Dec 2014 #17
It's disgusting. n/t SylviaD Dec 2014 #19
Thank you. Nt PCIntern Dec 2014 #12
That is pretty rich coming from vox. AngryAmish Dec 2014 #18
Stunning. And utterly devastating. nt RiverLover Dec 2014 #3
As soon as they took it over, I knew this would happen. n/t Triana Dec 2014 #4
Yep SickOfTheOnePct Dec 2014 #11
Good journalism continues to freefall in America Oilwellian Dec 2014 #7
*Reagan Democrat HQ* is gonna move further right? they're gonna be even *more* Eustonite? MisterP Dec 2014 #8
How convenient... nikto Dec 2014 #9
I've always found the New Republic to be fairly right-wing for a supposedly "liberal" magazine. Spider Jerusalem Dec 2014 #13
it went that way under Marty Peretz - pre-Paretz its politics were fairly similar to the Nation Douglas Carpenter Dec 2014 #14
Peretz took over in 1974 Spider Jerusalem Dec 2014 #15
well yes - that's true - I started reading it when I was high school - 70-73 and it was still quite Douglas Carpenter Dec 2014 #16
I think this is important enough for one self-indulgent kick Douglas Carpenter Dec 2014 #20
Boy, do I hate tech company assholes. alarimer Dec 2014 #21
deserves another kick, I think Douglas Carpenter Dec 2014 #22
The DLC of magazines Arugula Latte Dec 2014 #23
i'm not sure I would say that - I think that under Peretz its tone was more New Deal liberal but Douglas Carpenter Dec 2014 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»STATEMENT BY FORMER NEW R...