Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Executive Order on Police Militarization [View all]woo me with science
(32,139 posts)21. The militarization ITSELF needs to be stopped and reversed.
Last edited Mon Dec 1, 2014, 09:49 PM - Edit history (1)
The programs that *this* president resurrected and expanded need to be ended.
It's almost certain that if the police agencies cooperate, the ACLU will find that the militarization trend has accelerated since Kraska's studies more than a decade ago. All of the policies, incentives and funding mechanisms that were driving the trend then are still in effect now. And most of them have grown in size and scope.
The George W. Bush administration actually began scaling down the Byrne and COPS programs in the early 2000s, part of a general strategy of leaving law enforcement to states and localities. But the Obama administration has since resurrected both programs. The Byrne program got a $2 billion surge in funding as part of the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, by far the largest budget in the program's 25-year history. Obama also gave the COPS program $1.55 billion that same year, a 250 percent increase over its 2008 budget, and again the largest budget in the program's history. Vice President Joe Biden had championed both programs during his time in the Senate.
The Pentagon's 1033 program has also exploded under Obama. In the program's monthly newsletter (Motto: "From Warfighter to Crimefighter" , its director announced in October 2011 that his office had given away a record $500 million in military gear in fiscal year 2011, which he noted, "passes the previous mark by several hundred million dollars." He added, "I believe we can exceed that in FY 12.
Then there are the Department of Homeland Security's anti-terrorism grants. The Center for Investigative Reporting found in a 2011 investigation that since 2001, DHS has given out more than $34 billion in grants to police departments across the country, many of which have been used to purchase military-grade guns, tanks, armor, and armored personnel carriers. The grants have gone to such unlikely terrorism targets as Fargo, N.D.; Canyon County, Idaho; and Tuscaloosa, Ala.
The programs need to be ended.
We need a public, national database on police violence toward citizens.
And we need relentless attention from the DOJ to cases of police violence until this garbage stops.
Cameras to watch the militarized police are not enough. The militarization must be reversed. The police state must be ended. I see nothing serious from this administration showing that they have any thought, much less intention, of doing that.
This ongoing militarization is federally driven, bipartisan, and as much a part of the growing police state as the mass surveillance, prison industrial complex, and assaults on journalism, other political protesters, and whistleblowers.
We need much more than cameras. We need clear action to REVERSE this active militarization of our police forces by corporate politicians.You will know the corporate Third Way by their refusal to demand an actual end to militarization.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5872179
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Didn't it used to? I wonder if the National Guard is still getting it or if police departments are
ChisolmTrailDem
Dec 2014
#3
Well as most National Guards are decimated....I think the police....because it suits
VanillaRhapsody
Dec 2014
#4
Yup, better to have that equipment bearing down on the populace than to have it collecting
ChisolmTrailDem
Dec 2014
#7
I am speaking from what I have heard about them....that the economy has adverselly effected
VanillaRhapsody
Dec 2014
#25
THAT's the part that scares US.....why we want the National Guard to do that job...NOT Police
VanillaRhapsody
Dec 2014
#27
I absolutely agree. But this OP says that Pres Obama wants to "track" the equipment.
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#56
Wont this thrill the teaparty who are all certain that the federal govt is collecting weapons to
NoJusticeNoPeace
Dec 2014
#5
ayep. The loons will all screech that ..here it is, see weTOLDYOU this is what he would do...
Volaris
Dec 2014
#16
The TeaBaggers will laugh at this. The Pres isn't going to curtail the weapon sales, he is merely
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#52
Adding congrats on 20K posts, m'dear. Also, that equipment needs to be in the Nat'l Guard Armory...
Hekate
Dec 2014
#6
Yes, I get your point about an SU invasion, it's your avatar which I have always loved.
sheshe2
Dec 2014
#12
I don't think it was edited out. These are two separate pictures. The pic up top is when more guys
okaawhatever
Dec 2014
#38
So did you notice what the action the President is taking with this Exec Order? TRACKING
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#53
For what? For demanding that we start " better track[ing] the weapons"? What will tracking
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#57
Sadly this is the Obama I voted for also. He didn't say he would do anything but "track".
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#58
Fuck some better tracking and reviews STOP THE FLOW OF THE HARDWARE AND REPO what is out there.
TheKentuckian
Dec 2014
#41
Thank you. More corporate messaging to normalize the unconscionable.
woo me with science
Dec 2014
#42
But sheshe this exec order accomplishes nothing. Zero, zilch. As CIC why doesn't he simply
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#54
The entire Democratic leadership opposed Grayson amendment to stop arming cops with DOD weapons
woo me with science
Dec 2014
#45
Can you spell Bull Shit? This is more rhetoric. What action will be taken? More tracking?
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#51