Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
18. Yup. Nothing ever changes, except for the worse.
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 08:28 PM
Nov 2014

We get cynical, pretty speeches and cheering propaganda voices, and nothing more.

Nothing gets better anymore. No one is ever serious about actual change for the better.

In fact, the corporate politicians making pretty speeches are relentlessly making things worse:




_______________________________________________________________________________

The entire Democratic leadership opposed Grayson amendment to stop arming cops with DOD weapons
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025390424


Police Militarization (including the Obama administration's role)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/06/aclu-police-militarization-swat_n_2813334.html

It's almost certain that if the police agencies cooperate, the ACLU will find that the militarization trend has accelerated since Kraska's studies more than a decade ago. All of the policies, incentives and funding mechanisms that were driving the trend then are still in effect now. And most of them have grown in size and scope.

The George W. Bush administration actually began scaling down the Byrne and COPS programs in the early 2000s, part of a general strategy of leaving law enforcement to states and localities. But the Obama administration has since resurrected both programs. The Byrne program got a $2 billion surge in funding as part of the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, by far the largest budget in the program's 25-year history. Obama also gave the COPS program $1.55 billion that same year, a 250 percent increase over its 2008 budget, and again the largest budget in the program's history. Vice President Joe Biden had championed both programs during his time in the Senate.

The Pentagon's 1033 program has also exploded under Obama. In the program's monthly newsletter (Motto: "From Warfighter to Crimefighter&quot , its director announced in October 2011 that his office had given away a record $500 million in military gear in fiscal year 2011, which he noted, "passes the previous mark by several hundred million dollars." He added, "I believe we can exceed that in FY 12.”

Then there are the Department of Homeland Security's anti-terrorism grants. The Center for Investigative Reporting found in a 2011 investigation that since 2001, DHS has given out more than $34 billion in grants to police departments across the country, many of which have been used to purchase military-grade guns, tanks, armor, and armored personnel carriers. The grants have gone to such unlikely terrorism targets as Fargo, N.D.; Canyon County, Idaho; and Tuscaloosa, Ala.




And I'm confused at to what the heck you mean. LawDeeDah Nov 2014 #1
Me too! procon Nov 2014 #2
Actually, they don't. At least to me. calimary Nov 2014 #3
Why is your skin color relevant to the President's comments? Spazito Nov 2014 #4
I'm wondering how they sound to an African-American person . . . Brigid Nov 2014 #13
I'm still puzzled as to why you would want to separate out how one viewed the... Spazito Nov 2014 #17
I don't know how else to explain it. Brigid Nov 2014 #19
I think it would have been more helpful had you put what you heard that was ... Spazito Nov 2014 #22
They sounded like the words of a man who means well, but has been broken. Ken Burch Nov 2014 #14
Your take differs from mine quite drastically... Spazito Nov 2014 #15
Maybe that is what I'm trying to get at. Brigid Nov 2014 #16
I'm sure the President ordered that split screen himself. LawDeeDah Nov 2014 #23
Of course he didn't. Brigid Nov 2014 #26
I guess we all hear what we want to hear...nt SidDithers Nov 2014 #24
Had nothing to do with what I wanted to hear, Sid. Ken Burch Nov 2014 #25
nt Nemesis_Anon Nov 2014 #5
Because you know he doesn't mean it? Man from Pickens Nov 2014 #6
Yup. Nothing ever changes, except for the worse. woo me with science Nov 2014 #18
Cool, brah...Go put your faith in Rand '16, then... Blue_Tires Nov 2014 #27
... SidDithers Nov 2014 #37
I didn't think it sounded hollow. Quantess Nov 2014 #7
I thought so too! nt arthritisR_US Nov 2014 #10
I guess I'm thinking of how many times I've heard this before. Brigid Nov 2014 #8
So you just had to post a thread about how the President sounded "hollow"? smh. Cha Nov 2014 #11
I'm a white Canadian and they did not arthritisR_US Nov 2014 #9
Without seeing the words you speak of seveneyes Nov 2014 #12
You mean that bullshit about us being a nation of laws? Yep, hollow. Scuba Nov 2014 #20
Well, there is that, definitely. Brigid Nov 2014 #30
I said last night that I thought he sounded tired. Really emotional. Quiet, holding his feelings in. jwirr Nov 2014 #21
He's Said More About Race otohara Nov 2014 #28
Because it *was* hollow. woo me with science Nov 2014 #29
He sounded helpless. bravenak Nov 2014 #31
You're right about that. Brigid Nov 2014 #34
Because they WERE hollow. Odin2005 Nov 2014 #32
Just a few minutes ago, Brigid Nov 2014 #33
I'm very proud of our President's words MyUncle Nov 2014 #35
Because they were. LeftyMom Nov 2014 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why do President Obama's ...»Reply #18