Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
95. Yes, there was. But might as well skip it, since you don't like it.
Thu Oct 23, 2014, 05:15 PM
Oct 2014

Here it is again:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1016&pid=82122

When we talk about plutonium and it being found around the world, what we are really saying is that all the other radioactive isotopes that came out with the plutonium from Fukushima are also present.

Do you know what the decay products of plutonium are? Yes or no.

But then you go off on potassium 40, as if that were a killer particle emitter

Actually, it is. Potassium-40 decays by emitting either an electron or a positron. Antimatter is not exactly a nice thing to have in your body. And about 4,900 K-40 atoms in your body decay every second.

What does plutonium decay into? It emits a weak gamma ray. A positron is gonna do a lot more damage than a weak gamma ray. Now, plutonium does decays into other things that have other effects. Do you know what those are? Yes or no.

We did not evolve with plutonium, or cesium 134, or cesium 137, or a whole range of other radioactive isotopes.

Actually, we did. Plutonium is the only one in your list that is not naturally-occurring.

I am not hoping anyone forgets anything I have written

Then why are you repeating arguments that were dismantled in January? Why are you insisting I provide links doing so, when they were already provided in January?
Too late. zappaman Oct 2014 #1
He will be here soon enough to educate us... snooper2 Oct 2014 #2
That's ok, the radiation went back in time and killed us all already. jeff47 Oct 2014 #5
No, we all died during the Y2K disaster. MineralMan Oct 2014 #7
Sounds like progress. It's good to have some actual information MineralMan Oct 2014 #3
Safety is relative jeff47 Oct 2014 #4
Indeed FBaggins Oct 2014 #8
Very good, jeff RobertEarl Oct 2014 #79
Yes, the time traveling radiation has wiped out all life in the northern hemisphere jeff47 Oct 2014 #81
Huh? RobertEarl Oct 2014 #82
It's your theory. jeff47 Oct 2014 #83
Not my theory RobertEarl Oct 2014 #84
Already posted a link. From your topic in January jeff47 Oct 2014 #85
Close RobertEarl Oct 2014 #86
"The best I've ever done" being a thread I was in in January. jeff47 Oct 2014 #87
Now you are just rambling RobertEarl Oct 2014 #89
Nope. You're projecting, yet again. jeff47 Oct 2014 #90
So that is a yes. RobertEarl Oct 2014 #91
I did post a link in that post. jeff47 Oct 2014 #93
There was no link about RobertEarl Oct 2014 #94
Yes, there was. But might as well skip it, since you don't like it. jeff47 Oct 2014 #95
Your link, jeff, is about mussels RobertEarl Oct 2014 #96
Heh RobertEarl Oct 2014 #98
>99% <> 100% Orrex Oct 2014 #6
Listen to me. We've traced the radiation... it's coming from inside the house! FSogol Oct 2014 #23
Well, if you can't believe Tepco, who can you believe? gratuitous Oct 2014 #9
A few corrections FBaggins Oct 2014 #10
So, your information is outdated or bad, but my reading comprehension is poor? gratuitous Oct 2014 #12
Nope to the first... and yes to the second. FBaggins Oct 2014 #13
DU rec... SidDithers Oct 2014 #11
Ah... the classics. nt FBaggins Oct 2014 #14
So, in other words, a global catastrophe. NuclearDem Oct 2014 #15
Hey now... don't go putting words in their mouths. FBaggins Oct 2014 #16
ENENews RobertEarl Oct 2014 #17
An excellent example of how enenews twists reality in their reporting (sic) FBaggins Oct 2014 #21
How do you explain how the entire pacific coast has been radiated and even dolphins in the Atlantic zappaman Oct 2014 #29
Active imagination? FBaggins Oct 2014 #44
UN and Greenpeace say RobertEarl Oct 2014 #56
ENENews!!!! zappaman Oct 2014 #24
As expected. longship Oct 2014 #31
Took long enough zappaman Oct 2014 #32
Well, my friend. Sometimes the only appropriate response to ideology is ridicule. longship Oct 2014 #33
Good News. Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #18
Fukushima butterflies RobertEarl Oct 2014 #19
Not sure why you thought that was relevant to the thread... FBaggins Oct 2014 #20
It was debunked two years ago? RobertEarl Oct 2014 #22
Because it was written before and ENENews just decided to rerun it again for the gullible. zappaman Oct 2014 #26
Actually there has been a new study Generic Other Oct 2014 #38
Topic is removal of fuel rods RobertEarl Oct 2014 #41
Correction FBaggins Oct 2014 #42
It was just posted this year? FBaggins Oct 2014 #36
It's worse than you realize. Orrex Oct 2014 #25
LOL! zappaman Oct 2014 #27
Why do you hate science? RobertEarl Oct 2014 #28
Ironic post of the year! zappaman Oct 2014 #30
this one is indeed fabulous ProdigalJunkMail Oct 2014 #53
Here's a fabulous link RobertEarl Oct 2014 #63
My notions and emotions? Orrex Oct 2014 #35
They will fall for just about anything, won't they? FBaggins Oct 2014 #37
OMFG! First the sea stars, and now the butterflies! longship Oct 2014 #46
I was waiting for a post from you. LOL. nt Logical Oct 2014 #65
As we all were. zappaman Oct 2014 #68
First good Fukushima news we've heard Generic Other Oct 2014 #34
That's really the first you've heard? FBaggins Oct 2014 #39
You really think there has been "good news" coming out of Fukushima? Generic Other Oct 2014 #40
Certainly FBaggins Oct 2014 #43
You can't determine the magnitude of the problem Generic Other Oct 2014 #52
They have already come to a conclusion RobertEarl Oct 2014 #60
I have to agree with you here, Robert Generic Other Oct 2014 #74
Never heard of so much sickness & death in such a short period RobertEarl Oct 2014 #45
Please keep that FDS nonsense in creative speculation where it belongs. FBaggins Oct 2014 #47
The plural of anecdote is not data. longship Oct 2014 #48
"I would be building a bunker to hide in" zappaman Oct 2014 #49
Heh heh heh! longship Oct 2014 #50
The same. Always spewing the same crap. longship Oct 2014 #51
You are in violation of the TOS -- za RobertEarl Oct 2014 #55
Uh huh. zappaman Oct 2014 #57
And another: Libel RobertEarl Oct 2014 #69
Time to lawyer up I guess. zappaman Oct 2014 #70
So you've stopped denying that's you? LeftyMom Oct 2014 #59
It is? zappaman Oct 2014 #62
Xema and I were playing the Doomsday Preppers drinking game and saw him. LeftyMom Oct 2014 #64
Heh RobertEarl Oct 2014 #54
" Anyway, these report items are words for the wise. The rest of you, well, you're on your own." zappaman Oct 2014 #58
UN and Grenpeace say RobertEarl Oct 2014 #61
Please don't copypasta stupid crap all over the thread. LeftyMom Oct 2014 #66
Please share your credentials with us Generic Other Oct 2014 #77
I prefer an anti-nuke "hack" site Generic Other Oct 2014 #75
Who said everything's hunky dory? longship Oct 2014 #92
LOL, your usual source. nt Logical Oct 2014 #67
Source is RobertEarl Oct 2014 #71
Enenews nt Logical Oct 2014 #72
Post your sources RobertEarl Oct 2014 #78
Here's the thing RobertEarl Oct 2014 #73
Robert you don't have to defend yourself for caring Generic Other Oct 2014 #76
Thank you, Generic Other RobertEarl Oct 2014 #97
our eternal problem n/t librechik Oct 2014 #80
In short, nuclear power plants are too dangerous brentspeak Oct 2014 #88
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fukushima - Unit 4 spent ...»Reply #95