Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: No, Seriously, How Contagious Is Ebola? [View all]BlindTiresias
(1,563 posts)30. I mean
The adjusted number versus the unadjusted. Do you think the adjustments made were inaccurate at all?
Honestly I'm not glossing over anything, I only said there was under reporting of the number of infected by quite a bit according to the adjusted estimates. Maybe they are wrong and the numbers have been more or less accurate? Would like to read some competing information if you have any.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Here is an interesting article "can you catch ebola from an infected blanket?"
uppityperson
Oct 2014
#5
THIS is the ANSWER. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ No more media hysteria, shall we?
Fred Sanders
Oct 2014
#41
I fully expect to see the same idiocy from the denialists/antivaxer/antiscience/
kestrel91316
Oct 2014
#32
I don't mean to imply it was intentional or otherwise some shocking secret
BlindTiresias
Oct 2014
#27
The curve for Uganda, Nigeria and Senegal has flatlined to 0.Ebola controlled. Why do you want to be
Fred Sanders
Oct 2014
#42
That is a very interesting link, thank you. I do not see R0 numbers there though
uppityperson
Oct 2014
#28
We do not commonly walk barefoot across sharp stones in a common latrine area
alphafemale
Oct 2014
#18
MY question: EXACTLY HOW did those cured US victims contract it? We've never been told.
WinkyDink
Oct 2014
#37