General Discussion

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)

125. Anti-democratic (small "d"), anti-freedom, anti-Civil Rights stance. Let cops run rough-

Reply to Boom Sound 416 (Reply #113)

Sun Sep 14, 2014, 08:51 AM

Sep 2014

shod?

That skinny A-A actress had more guts and knowledge about her rights.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

337 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

LAPD Confuses Black Actress Kissing White Husband for Prostitute [View all] Blue_Tires Sep 2014 OP

saw this on local news, they said some "citizen" called the police to complain about it JI7 Sep 2014 #1

Ironically, in my hometown-- which used to be a "sunset town"-- Art_from_Ark Sep 2014 #168

I seriously doubt anyone called. That's just cop CYA. Probably the cops just saw them, tblue37 Sep 2014 #222

Horrible. Heidi Sep 2014 #2

K&R silverweb Sep 2014 #3

My grandson is biracial mimi85 Sep 2014 #13

Will the stupidity ever f*%#ing end? Uncle Joe Sep 2014 #4

Either it's getting worse malaise Sep 2014 #61

I'm Going With B ProfessorGAC Sep 2014 #104

I agree n/t malaise Sep 2014 #117

I think a little of both. PeoViejo Sep 2014 #133

Comments pages on the internet also allow many folks to say things they'd never malaise Sep 2014 #136

What really riles me PeoViejo Sep 2014 #144

Well we see that a lot more here than you do there malaise Sep 2014 #148

I presume NOLALady Sep 2014 #203

We're hearing it more. There was a time when these two would've been beaten, at best! arcane1 Sep 2014 #202

Maybe Obama can have a beer with the cops. grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #204

Good grief. nt WhiteAndNerdy Sep 2014 #5

I can see why Danièle Watts would be so insulted and Pissed that she wouldn't Cha Sep 2014 #6

It is humiliating. Behind the Aegis Sep 2014 #16

These showings of resistance are necessary so the police are forced to use Baitball Blogger Sep 2014 #162

Absolutely. Cha Sep 2014 #219

I was mistaken by a cop for a hooker Skittles Sep 2014 #7

ok..not going to make a joke steve2470 Sep 2014 #199

I WILL KICK VALUED steve2470 ARSE Skittles Sep 2014 #218

They used to harass us all the time on Broadway Ave. in San Antonio. Rozlee Sep 2014 #216

When I lived in LA I was stopped and hassled Demobrat Sep 2014 #8

LAPD are dickwads AgingAmerican Sep 2014 #9

Wow, what year did this happen? RE EDITED. zonkers Sep 2014 #263

Around 1981 AgingAmerican Sep 2014 #313

That was the "Daryl Gates" era. Chokeholds, Eleanor Bumpers. It all kind of led to the 93 riots, zonkers Sep 2014 #314

Oh yeah AgingAmerican Sep 2014 #322

But, arent we required, by law, to provide ID to the police if we are asked? TheDebbieDee Sep 2014 #10

No. Evidently CA has no "stop and identify law" cali Sep 2014 #11

At least we don't have mimi85 Sep 2014 #12

No--only in states that have a stop and identify law. tblue37 Sep 2014 #15

As a permanent resident, I am obliged to show my ID on demand. mwooldri Sep 2014 #217

K&R. nt tblue37 Sep 2014 #14

Maybe you should just Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #17

Why? Behind the Aegis Sep 2014 #18

Because it's the adult thing to do. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #19

No, it's not. Behind the Aegis Sep 2014 #21

I missed that in the article Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #24

Here, let me help you... Behind the Aegis Sep 2014 #25

Where is the summons? Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #26

Where is the box on the ID that says "Prostitute: yes or no"? Behind the Aegis Sep 2014 #28

Really? Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #29

I'll ask YOU again...Where is the box to check if you are a prosititue or not? Behind the Aegis Sep 2014 #31

Cop wanted to run her name for priors. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #32

OH! All prostitutes have priors! Behind the Aegis Sep 2014 #34

Oy vey Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #35

One can hope. Behind the Aegis Sep 2014 #38

Good lunasun Sep 2014 #177

In more ways than you mean, I think (nt) muriel_volestrangler Sep 2014 #197

finally thanks LOL, now go make sure you have your papers on you snooper2 Sep 2014 #241

All black women have priors? nt justiceischeap Sep 2014 #48

To many people - yes. JustAnotherGen Sep 2014 #52

Really, that's what took away from the post. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #57

I don't need luck, I'm white. justiceischeap Sep 2014 #103

Are you ACTUALLY SAYING that anyone can AND OUGHT to be stopped so a cop can check "for priors"?! WinkyDink Sep 2014 #123

Uhhhh, no. I'm not saying that. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #124

How is that a stretch when that is exactly what you're saying? n/t kcr Sep 2014 #213

No, just anyone "suspicious".... who looks "out of place" Warren DeMontague Sep 2014 #205

But HE HAD NO RIGHT TO DO THAT! Because she was not doing anything tblue37 Sep 2014 #225

so, if she had no priors, she is innocent, if she did- automatically guilty? Is that how the system bettyellen Sep 2014 #292

Just a guess. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #295

Summons is not arrested. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #33

Oh, that's better. Behind the Aegis Sep 2014 #36

My friend JustAnotherGen Sep 2014 #50

I seriously doubt that. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #60

Out of curiosity ismnotwasm Sep 2014 #179

Stay curious Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #252

I bet no one called the cops. They're covering their butts because they got tblue37 Sep 2014 #226

Actually, it is. Feral Child Sep 2014 #69

That's interesting. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #72

It's a charge of a violation of geek tragedy Sep 2014 #77

Fair enough. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #82

Legally, it's the same. Feral Child Sep 2014 #94

She was handcufed in public! That is offensive, even if no charges were filed-- tblue37 Sep 2014 #224

false on its face uponit7771 Sep 2014 #41

No, it's the quisling thing to do. Feral Child Sep 2014 #74

Quisling, huh? Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #79

I don't grok your post. Feral Child Sep 2014 #97

Don't feed the trolls. nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #138

3500 posts since March 15, eh Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #141

I spend a lot of time online. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #146

3500 posts since March 15, eh Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #141

Copy that. Feral Child Sep 2014 #161

That's an interesting definition of ADULT: it's adult to conform, to defer to authority. enough Sep 2014 #112

Something like that I suppose Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #113

Anti-democratic (small "d"), anti-freedom, anti-Civil Rights stance. Let cops run rough- WinkyDink Sep 2014 #125

No---It is the acceding-to-Fascism thing to do. California cops cannot demand ID by LAW. WinkyDink Sep 2014 #121

It's the police who weren't acting like adults! CoffeeCat Sep 2014 #130

I'm with on your first point. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #132

PLUS ONE, a huge bunch! Enthusiast Sep 2014 #171

No. A black person may get stopped and hassled several times a day despite not tblue37 Sep 2014 #223

Considering the article as the sole source Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #248

Wow!!! Some rational thinking here. Amazing. I'm betting you get beat up for this adigal Sep 2014 #293

Thank you for your post. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #297

Cheers back to you - I have been piled on here, too adigal Sep 2014 #305

Why? She do something wrong? B Calm Sep 2014 #20

I guess the difference between you and me is Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #22

LOL... ok... you're late for work.. cop stops you and ask you for ID so he can take 2 seconds uponit7771 Sep 2014 #42

Wow. Aren't you the intuitive one. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #43

Doesn't take to much reasoning to see where people talk from a point of bad perspective uponit7771 Sep 2014 #45

Well ten years in the media Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #49

It's exactly the same JustAnotherGen Sep 2014 #53

Look up Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #56

I did JustAnotherGen Sep 2014 #58

You lost me Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #59

I'm sorry - responded below JustAnotherGen Sep 2014 #63

LOL! Rex Sep 2014 #174

A textbook example of Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #261

Let me guess: White. IdaBriggs Sep 2014 #46

C'mon Ida, you can do better than that. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #114

Since I have been invited... IdaBriggs Sep 2014 #159

That's more like it. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #163

+1 Couldn't agree more! B Calm Sep 2014 #165

Not to mention that for a black person, any interaction with the police has the tblue37 Sep 2014 #227

Ok then. Where were we? Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #242

... Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #336

Sometimes you need to do what's not convenient... Dems2002 Sep 2014 #175

Hearing you. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #259

KWB* Behind the Aegis Sep 2014 #23

I love ya! JustAnotherGen Sep 2014 #55

I once got stopped for no reason when I was 19 Reter Sep 2014 #160

do you still support zimmerman ? JI7 Sep 2014 #27

I support equal protection regardless of race. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #30

so you no longer support Zimmerman ? JI7 Sep 2014 #39

How many times have you asked me this question. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #40

Here is a question for you. If she had been whit and kissing, would she have been "summoned" kelliekat44 Sep 2014 #47

She wasn't summoned at all, first. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #51

So, in your world, cops have the right to detain geek tragedy Sep 2014 #75

It's not just my world. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #89

Not according to the Supreme Court. nt geek tragedy Sep 2014 #91

We don't need to live in YOUR world. U4ikLefty Sep 2014 #190

Maybe you should sit Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #243

It is wrongly, and we only live in that world because too many people go along tblue37 Sep 2014 #228

Do people ever look back and regret their rush to judgement? joeglow3 Sep 2014 #323

If they do Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #325

Naw, takes too much time. delete_bush Sep 2014 #335

You said - "I support equal protection regardless of race" Caretha Sep 2014 #155

Lame Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #156

This message was self-deleted by its author Demobrat Sep 2014 #37

She exercised her rights by not showing her ID. Vattel Sep 2014 #44

Both sides exercised their rights. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #54

I have to defend her side JustAnotherGen Sep 2014 #62

I'm not saying what she did was wrong. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #64

See another response JustAnotherGen Sep 2014 #71

If my wife and I were in that sich Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #76

That concedes the cops right to racially profile geek tragedy Sep 2014 #80

What we don't know is the context of location Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #83

They had no reasonable suspicion. geek tragedy Sep 2014 #84

We're kind of in agreement. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #86

No, I'm saying the problem is the cop, not geek tragedy Sep 2014 #90

It's not blame. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #98

"She created plausible suspicion." geek tragedy Sep 2014 #100

It's not my argument. It's the cops. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #101

Why should she have to do that..... BronxBoy Sep 2014 #129

Actually it was mike bloomberg thinking that way Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #131

I was going to let it go, but as an English teacher I just have to say, "defuse." tblue37 Sep 2014 #229

Yeah you got me there. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #247

Typing with arthritic hands on a mobile keyboard. Yes, I accidentally got a "c" in there where tblue37 Sep 2014 #324

Because I know probably some of the same people you know JustAnotherGen Sep 2014 #93

Something similar happened to my husband. NOLALady Sep 2014 #211

Actually, you won't get much argument Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #250

It gives implicit consent to the continued abuse of power for its own sake. LanternWaste Sep 2014 #330

And if those were the facts Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #333

My husband is a Black man NOLALady Sep 2014 #209

My parents were run off the road JustAnotherGen Sep 2014 #234

The cops don't have a right to be racist jackbooted thugs. nt geek tragedy Sep 2014 #65

Agreed. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #67

She was detained because she was kissing a white man. geek tragedy Sep 2014 #73

They have NO right to detain without proibable cause RedCappedBandit Sep 2014 #102

Fine. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #106

It's clear that you're not very close to this issue. NT RedCappedBandit Sep 2014 #107

Is it now. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #108

Not when they had no probable cause, and thus no RIGHT, to demand her ID in tblue37 Sep 2014 #232

According to the cop, there was a call made in about lewd acts being comitted. LisaL Sep 2014 #240

I suppose that without the details Vattel Sep 2014 #66

Probably true. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #68

Why should we have to? a la izquierda Sep 2014 #70

Ask the goverment. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #78

There is no law requiring people to carry ID. geek tragedy Sep 2014 #81

That may be true Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #85

NO THEY CAN'T. geek tragedy Sep 2014 #87

Yes. And yes they can. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #92

It's illegal for them to do so. geek tragedy Sep 2014 #95

They're breaking the law. RedCappedBandit Sep 2014 #105

+infinity. nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #145

What If, Because You're NOT Driving. . . ProfessorGAC Sep 2014 #110

The problem with your argument is Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #111

No it isn't gollygee Sep 2014 #116

Keep reading Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #128

Prove It ProfessorGAC Sep 2014 #120

Here you go Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #126

What about the part where they can't do that? PoutrageFatigue Sep 2014 #140

Let's start with 1 and I'll be happy to go to two Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #147

Refusing to produce a photo ID does not mean she had one muriel_volestrangler Sep 2014 #198

May be Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #249

As police officers, they should have known it was their duty to back off at that point muriel_volestrangler Sep 2014 #251

Lol Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #253

Good for her for refusing. phylny Sep 2014 #215

You said - "I'm showing my ID abd walking the f away. Feel free to make your own choice" Caretha Sep 2014 #157

You were alerted on, just so you know. 99Forever Sep 2014 #169

I've been at work Caretha Sep 2014 #207

They can because they do? That's some circular reasoning you've got going on there. suffragette Sep 2014 #186

Please, your're not saying what I think your saying Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #246

Have you considered they do because... BklnDem75 Sep 2014 #238

Some states are stop and identify, like CO. joshcryer Sep 2014 #99

When I read about the civil case Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #109

You will. joshcryer Sep 2014 #134

Fair enough Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #135

FWIW, I think stop and identify is illegal. joshcryer Sep 2014 #164

I hear you. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #260

I agree, in this country, we are not required to have ID on us treestar Sep 2014 #166

CA is not a stop and identify state. joshcryer Sep 2014 #96

MAYBE THE COPS SHOULD OBEY THEIR OWN STATE'S LAWS. WinkyDink Sep 2014 #119

Again. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #122

It is her LEGAL RIGHT to refuse to show it. Did YOU read the whole thing? It wasn't a traffic stop. WinkyDink Sep 2014 #127

Again. She is not required to produce ID by law. PoutrageFatigue Sep 2014 #150

Who are you talking to Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #151

Well, let's see, I'm not aware that the cops, or the actress are posting... PoutrageFatigue Sep 2014 #152

Point Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #153

HOLY FUCK SHE REFUSED TO SHOW HER ID Warren DeMontague Sep 2014 #206

She was not driving, so she does not have to carry ID treestar Sep 2014 #167

Maybe cops should not instantly profile people based on racist notions? Rex Sep 2014 #172

If as the husband wrote the police whistler162 Sep 2014 #236

The caller did not cuff and detain Danielle... BklnDem75 Sep 2014 #239

The conversation was held and she refused a request for ID whistler162 Sep 2014 #303

She has a right to refuse... BklnDem75 Sep 2014 #306

No arguement from me. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #256

I never carry ID. hunter Sep 2014 #180

And you told the cop which? Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #254

Once, as a brash young man, I said the flowery equivalent of "fuck you" but that didn't end well. hunter Sep 2014 #274

Likewise to a large extent. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #275

What singular point? That we should passively accept police abuse? hunter Sep 2014 #280

Maybe it's don't sweat the small stuff. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #282

It's not small stuff. hunter Sep 2014 #286

If you're referring to the OP Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #288

Dear badge bunnies, badge backers, bootlickers, cop-cultists and so-called "cops" 951-Riverside Sep 2014 #191

Why the fuck are you telling me this. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #255

Just to clarify, by "so-called cops" I'm talking about the violent psychopaths who joined the force 951-Riverside Sep 2014 #264

Maybe you should read the constitution. cui bono Sep 2014 #195

Would you point me to the spot in the Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #257

Unreal. The arresting officers should face consequences for this. Chemisse Sep 2014 #88

1st their bosses heard about the incident was when posted online. cops Didnt even file a report Liberal_in_LA Sep 2014 #212

I don't even get this! get the red out Sep 2014 #115

PLUS ONE! Enthusiast Sep 2014 #173

CA can't require ID! Disturbing acknowledgment from a CA cop (see first reply): WinkyDink Sep 2014 #118

That answer was rather chilling to read...and the "Great Answer!" response... ScreamingMeemie Sep 2014 #188

Do johns normally kiss their tricks? HipChick Sep 2014 #137

That struck me as well. Eleanors38 Sep 2014 #154

NO. Rex Sep 2014 #182

BTW, I am not going to ask how you know that, but just HipChick Sep 2014 #183

Very good observation on your part. Rex Sep 2014 #185

Exactly..scraping the barrel for excuses for racial profiling HipChick Sep 2014 #192

or leave the door to the car open ? KurtNYC Sep 2014 #301

No words. merrily Sep 2014 #139

A more correct title... Nosey parker mistakes husband and wife whistler162 Sep 2014 #141

Dumbass cops...nt SidDithers Sep 2014 #149

Good for her! The people who cave and comply just embolden the cops to do more of this crap. Gidney N Cloyd Sep 2014 #158

Did They Ask Her White Husband For ID otohara Sep 2014 #170

Yes, they did ask him, and he showed it muriel_volestrangler Sep 2014 #200

in SoCal no less…. dhill926 Sep 2014 #176

Clearly a case of kissing while black and white. L0oniX Sep 2014 #178

This thread taught me something important about my ignore list alcibiades_mystery Sep 2014 #181

Don't do that JustAnotherGen Sep 2014 #187

Well, Los Angeles being the Deep South and all, are we really that surprised? nt Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2014 #184

Well, I learned a lot from this thread. ScreamingMeemie Sep 2014 #189

Right? PoutrageFatigue Sep 2014 #193

This: Brigid Sep 2014 #194

Zee did not show zee papers!! Strelnikov_ Sep 2014 #196

just horrible nt steve2470 Sep 2014 #201

it has happened before. i recall that the interacial couple had to show their matching wedding Liberal_in_LA Sep 2014 #208

before they realized she was a celebrity, they threatened her with ambulance and drugging Liberal_in_LA Sep 2014 #210

2nd most read story on dailymail today. comments are overwhelmingly anti police state Liberal_in_LA Sep 2014 #214

SUE!!!!! Norm Guy Sep 2014 #220

If she can find the person who called the whistler162 Sep 2014 #235

I had to kick the duplicate of this thread in order to make a comment..... Norm Guy Sep 2014 #221

This message was self-deleted by its author Guy Whitey Corngood Sep 2014 #230

Motherfuckers IronLionZion Sep 2014 #231

Seems another good argument to legalize prostitution. Trillo Sep 2014 #233

If it wasn't this, it would be something else gollygee Sep 2014 #237

Update from TMZ with audio of the interaction between her and LAPD 951-Riverside Sep 2014 #244

It's an audio of what happened. LisaL Sep 2014 #245

WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO RESPOND TO ME HERE? Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #266

Sure, had her story (which may be bullshit) been true you'd be wrong. If the Guy Whitey Corngood Sep 2014 #268

Go read my first response then listen to the audio Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #269

Meh.... It's been explained to you throughout the thread why you would've been wrong. nt Guy Whitey Corngood Sep 2014 #270

LOL Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #271

Whatever you say champ. nt Guy Whitey Corngood Sep 2014 #272

Best damn crickets I ever heard. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #304

Even self-perceived self-validation is better than no self-validation at all... LanternWaste Sep 2014 #331

But when it's actual Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #332

Daddy Daddy! LOL snooper2 Sep 2014 #294

I hope she and her husband sue the fuck out of those racist pigs SaltyBro Sep 2014 #258

Are you going to come back and admit the cop was right and you were wrong? joeglow3 Sep 2014 #326

In this day and age and in Studio city, no less! (really an adjunct of Hollywood). No decent cop zonkers Sep 2014 #262

Eyewitnesses claim they had sexual intercourse in public. closeupready Sep 2014 #265

There is zero proof that this was the case SaltyBro Sep 2014 #273

Here on DU, there typically IS "zero proof" of anything that closeupready Sep 2014 #279

If you actually believe that, I have a bridge to sell you. NutmegYankee Sep 2014 #289

why? How do you think the police got there? What's more likely cali Sep 2014 #290

Most likely? Someone didn't like a biracial couple kissing. NutmegYankee Sep 2014 #291

Eyewitness accounts, particularly where parts are independently corroborated, closeupready Sep 2014 #296

Then why were they not summonsed or arrested? NutmegYankee Sep 2014 #309

Arrest a witness - why? ??? closeupready Sep 2014 #317

Wow... NutmegYankee Sep 2014 #318

Oh ok, I get it - you hate cops. Anything else closeupready Sep 2014 #320

I'd rather stand with the people of Ferguson, MO. NutmegYankee Sep 2014 #321

Wow. What a disgusting move to avoid admitting your rush to judgement made you look like a fool. joeglow3 Sep 2014 #327

Most likely police are not that interested in pursuing this type of alleged crime. LisaL Sep 2014 #329

In studio city! If you believe that Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #298

Racism exists everywhere. Even in the bluest of places. NutmegYankee Sep 2014 #308

You ain't gotta tell me boss. Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #310

Then why would you deny it in studio city. NutmegYankee Sep 2014 #311

Racism may exist in studio city Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #316

A police department is about to be sued Gothmog Sep 2014 #267

So, kissing is now --- oldandhappy Sep 2014 #276

Newest reports indicate they were doing a lot more than kissing Bonx Sep 2014 #277

OK Thanks oldandhappy Sep 2014 #278

Newest reports? gollygee Sep 2014 #281

Well, they do have the original audio Bonx Sep 2014 #283

Where she does exactly what? gollygee Sep 2014 #284

I'll leave you to argue the semantics Bonx Sep 2014 #285

It isn't a semantic argument. It's a political argument. gollygee Sep 2014 #287

You are right, the cop was wrong, instead of saying "bringing up the race card" snooper2 Sep 2014 #299

hehe TexasMommaWithAHat Sep 2014 #300

Audio has been released: KurtNYC Sep 2014 #302

Is YOUR state on the "Stop and Identify" list? Thank God mine is not (nor is CA): WinkyDink Sep 2014 #307

The distinction Boom Sound 416 Sep 2014 #312

California's stop and identify status is a murky mess. Xithras Sep 2014 #315

Those laws only require you to identify yourself verbally. NutmegYankee Sep 2014 #319

She didn't ID herself verbally. LisaL Sep 2014 #328

I know. NutmegYankee Sep 2014 #334

She kept talking on the phone and walked away... joeybee12 Sep 2014 #337